Thermal field management improves patient-reported outcomes during ablation for papillary thyroid carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Wen-Jia Cai, Yan Li, Ying Wei, Zhen-Long Zhao, Jie Wu, Shi-Liang Cao, Li-Li Peng, Shu-Qi Li, Ming-An Yu
{"title":"Thermal field management improves patient-reported outcomes during ablation for papillary thyroid carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Wen-Jia Cai, Yan Li, Ying Wei, Zhen-Long Zhao, Jie Wu, Shi-Liang Cao, Li-Li Peng, Shu-Qi Li, Ming-An Yu","doi":"10.4329/wjr.v17.i9.111924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thermal ablation (TA) has been proved to be effective and safe as minimally invasive treatment method for thyroid nodules. However, patients' experience during the procedures and quality of life varies among operators.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore strategy to improve quality of life and subjective experiences during TA for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) based on thermal field management (TFM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective propensity-matched cohort study was conducted in a single center. A total of 490 patients with PTC treated with TA from September 2023 to August 2024 were studied and divided into two groups (TFM group and non-TFM group) according to treatment strategies. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to control for confounding factors. Complications, side effect and complaints of patients were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 113 patients (41.7 ± 10.6; 31 men, 82 women) were assigned to the TFM group, and 377 patients (mean age, 41.1 ± 10.7 year; 116 men, 261 women) were assigned to the non-TFM group. After PSM, a total of 108 patients were included in the TFM group, and 216 patients were included in the non-TFM group. The median follow-up was 10 months (range from 4-15 months). The incidence of voice change in the TFM group was significantly lower than that in the non-TFM group (0.9% <i>vs</i> 6.5%; <i>P</i> = 0.049). Although there was no statistically significant difference in rate of pain between the two groups, the proportion of complaining of pain in the TFM group was numerically lower than that in the non-TFM group (3.7% <i>vs</i> 9.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.090).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TFM, as a novel procedural optimization technique, can effectively improve quality of life and subjective experiences of patients during TA for PTC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23819,"journal":{"name":"World journal of radiology","volume":"17 9","pages":"111924"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476824/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i9.111924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thermal ablation (TA) has been proved to be effective and safe as minimally invasive treatment method for thyroid nodules. However, patients' experience during the procedures and quality of life varies among operators.

Aim: To explore strategy to improve quality of life and subjective experiences during TA for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) based on thermal field management (TFM).

Methods: This retrospective propensity-matched cohort study was conducted in a single center. A total of 490 patients with PTC treated with TA from September 2023 to August 2024 were studied and divided into two groups (TFM group and non-TFM group) according to treatment strategies. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to control for confounding factors. Complications, side effect and complaints of patients were compared between the two groups.

Results: A total of 113 patients (41.7 ± 10.6; 31 men, 82 women) were assigned to the TFM group, and 377 patients (mean age, 41.1 ± 10.7 year; 116 men, 261 women) were assigned to the non-TFM group. After PSM, a total of 108 patients were included in the TFM group, and 216 patients were included in the non-TFM group. The median follow-up was 10 months (range from 4-15 months). The incidence of voice change in the TFM group was significantly lower than that in the non-TFM group (0.9% vs 6.5%; P = 0.049). Although there was no statistically significant difference in rate of pain between the two groups, the proportion of complaining of pain in the TFM group was numerically lower than that in the non-TFM group (3.7% vs 9.7%, P = 0.090).

Conclusion: TFM, as a novel procedural optimization technique, can effectively improve quality of life and subjective experiences of patients during TA for PTC.

热场管理改善了甲状腺乳头状癌消融期间患者报告的结果:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:热消融(TA)作为一种微创治疗甲状腺结节的方法已被证明是安全有效的。然而,患者在手术过程中的体验和生活质量因手术者而异。目的:探讨基于热场管理(TFM)改善甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC) TA患者生活质量和主观体验的策略。方法:在单中心进行回顾性倾向匹配队列研究。对2023年9月至2024年8月接受TA治疗的490例PTC患者进行研究,根据治疗策略分为TFM组和非TFM组。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)控制混杂因素。比较两组患者的并发症、副作用及主诉情况。结果:TFM组共113例(41.7±10.6例,男性31例,女性82例),非TFM组377例(平均年龄41.1±10.7岁,男性116例,女性261例)。经PSM治疗后,TFM组共108例,非TFM组216例。中位随访时间为10个月(4-15个月)。TFM组的变声发生率明显低于非TFM组(0.9% vs 6.5%, P = 0.049)。两组患者的疼痛发生率差异无统计学意义,但TFM组的疼痛主诉比例低于非TFM组(3.7% vs 9.7%, P = 0.090)。结论:TFM作为一种新颖的程序优化技术,可有效改善PTC患者在TA期间的生活质量和主观体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World journal of radiology
World journal of radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
8.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信