{"title":"Gender-based radiation exposure and clinical outcomes in peripheral endovascular intervention for limb ischemia: A prospective study.","authors":"Subrata Kar, Clifton Espinoza","doi":"10.4330/wjc.v17.i9.110220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral endovascular intervention (PEVI) is performed using radiation. Radiation has deleterious health consequences for patients and operators.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the gender radiation disparities and procedural outcomes in PEVI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was performed in 186 consecutive patients (65 ± 12 years) at an academic medical center from January 2019 to April 2020 (mean follow-up of 3.9 ± 3.6 months) comparing the gender radiation disparity and outcomes of PEVI (<i>n</i> = 147 underwent intervention, 79.0%). Groups were divided into women (<i>n</i> = 99, 53.2%) and men (<i>n</i> = 87, 48.4%). Primary endpoints included air kerma, dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time, and contrast use. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury, stroke, repeat revascularization, major adverse limb event, and the composite of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Men showed increased DAP compared with women (15221.2 ± 25858.5 µGy × m<sup>2</sup> <i>vs</i> 9251.7 ± 9555.3 µGy × m<sup>2</sup>, <i>P</i> = 0.047), but no significant difference in air kerma or any other primary endpoints. In the secondary endpoints, no significant difference was found between gender.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Men had increased DAP indicating more radiation absorption in the exposed area. Gender outcomes showed no difference in complications. Thus, PEVI can be safely performed in men or women.</p>","PeriodicalId":23800,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Cardiology","volume":"17 9","pages":"110220"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v17.i9.110220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Peripheral endovascular intervention (PEVI) is performed using radiation. Radiation has deleterious health consequences for patients and operators.
Aim: To investigate the gender radiation disparities and procedural outcomes in PEVI.
Methods: A prospective observational study was performed in 186 consecutive patients (65 ± 12 years) at an academic medical center from January 2019 to April 2020 (mean follow-up of 3.9 ± 3.6 months) comparing the gender radiation disparity and outcomes of PEVI (n = 147 underwent intervention, 79.0%). Groups were divided into women (n = 99, 53.2%) and men (n = 87, 48.4%). Primary endpoints included air kerma, dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time, and contrast use. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury, stroke, repeat revascularization, major adverse limb event, and the composite of complications.
Results: Men showed increased DAP compared with women (15221.2 ± 25858.5 µGy × m2vs 9251.7 ± 9555.3 µGy × m2, P = 0.047), but no significant difference in air kerma or any other primary endpoints. In the secondary endpoints, no significant difference was found between gender.
Conclusion: Men had increased DAP indicating more radiation absorption in the exposed area. Gender outcomes showed no difference in complications. Thus, PEVI can be safely performed in men or women.