Gender-based radiation exposure and clinical outcomes in peripheral endovascular intervention for limb ischemia: A prospective study.

IF 2.8 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Subrata Kar, Clifton Espinoza
{"title":"Gender-based radiation exposure and clinical outcomes in peripheral endovascular intervention for limb ischemia: A prospective study.","authors":"Subrata Kar, Clifton Espinoza","doi":"10.4330/wjc.v17.i9.110220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral endovascular intervention (PEVI) is performed using radiation. Radiation has deleterious health consequences for patients and operators.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the gender radiation disparities and procedural outcomes in PEVI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was performed in 186 consecutive patients (65 ± 12 years) at an academic medical center from January 2019 to April 2020 (mean follow-up of 3.9 ± 3.6 months) comparing the gender radiation disparity and outcomes of PEVI (<i>n</i> = 147 underwent intervention, 79.0%). Groups were divided into women (<i>n</i> = 99, 53.2%) and men (<i>n</i> = 87, 48.4%). Primary endpoints included air kerma, dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time, and contrast use. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury, stroke, repeat revascularization, major adverse limb event, and the composite of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Men showed increased DAP compared with women (15221.2 ± 25858.5 µGy × m<sup>2</sup> <i>vs</i> 9251.7 ± 9555.3 µGy × m<sup>2</sup>, <i>P</i> = 0.047), but no significant difference in air kerma or any other primary endpoints. In the secondary endpoints, no significant difference was found between gender.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Men had increased DAP indicating more radiation absorption in the exposed area. Gender outcomes showed no difference in complications. Thus, PEVI can be safely performed in men or women.</p>","PeriodicalId":23800,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Cardiology","volume":"17 9","pages":"110220"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v17.i9.110220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peripheral endovascular intervention (PEVI) is performed using radiation. Radiation has deleterious health consequences for patients and operators.

Aim: To investigate the gender radiation disparities and procedural outcomes in PEVI.

Methods: A prospective observational study was performed in 186 consecutive patients (65 ± 12 years) at an academic medical center from January 2019 to April 2020 (mean follow-up of 3.9 ± 3.6 months) comparing the gender radiation disparity and outcomes of PEVI (n = 147 underwent intervention, 79.0%). Groups were divided into women (n = 99, 53.2%) and men (n = 87, 48.4%). Primary endpoints included air kerma, dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time, and contrast use. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury, stroke, repeat revascularization, major adverse limb event, and the composite of complications.

Results: Men showed increased DAP compared with women (15221.2 ± 25858.5 µGy × m2 vs 9251.7 ± 9555.3 µGy × m2, P = 0.047), but no significant difference in air kerma or any other primary endpoints. In the secondary endpoints, no significant difference was found between gender.

Conclusion: Men had increased DAP indicating more radiation absorption in the exposed area. Gender outcomes showed no difference in complications. Thus, PEVI can be safely performed in men or women.

Abstract Image

基于性别的辐射暴露和外周血管内介入治疗肢体缺血的临床结果:一项前瞻性研究。
背景:外周血管内介入治疗(PEVI)是一种放射治疗方法。辐射对病人和操作人员的健康造成有害后果。目的:探讨PEVI的性别放射差异及手术结果。方法:2019年1月至2020年4月,在某学术医疗中心(平均随访3.9±3.6个月)对186例连续患者(65±12岁)进行前瞻性观察研究,比较PEVI的性别辐射差异和结局(n = 147,占79.0%)。分组分为女性(n = 99, 53.2%)和男性(n = 87, 48.4%)。主要终点包括空气温度、剂量面积积(DAP)、透视时间和造影剂使用。次要终点包括全因死亡率、急性心肌梗死、急性肾损伤、卒中、重复血运重建术、主要肢体不良事件和并发症的综合。结果:男性与女性相比DAP增加(15221.2±25858.5µGy × m2 vs 9251.7±9555.3µGy × m2, P = 0.047),但空气质量及其他主要终点无显著差异。在次要终点,没有发现性别之间的显著差异。结论:男性DAP升高表明暴露区域的辐射吸收更多。性别结果显示并发症无差异。因此,PEVI可以安全地在男性或女性中进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Cardiology
World Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信