Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with higher recurrence rates of atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation.

Q3 Medicine
Ree Lu, Devin Skoll, Ahmed Y Gasmelseed, Geoffrey A Rubin, Elaine Y Wan, Amardeep S Saluja, Jose M Dizon, Angelo B Biviano, Hasan Garan, Hirad Yarmohammadi
{"title":"Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with higher recurrence rates of atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation.","authors":"Ree Lu, Devin Skoll, Ahmed Y Gasmelseed, Geoffrey A Rubin, Elaine Y Wan, Amardeep S Saluja, Jose M Dizon, Angelo B Biviano, Hasan Garan, Hirad Yarmohammadi","doi":"10.1016/j.ipej.2025.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at increased risk of cardiovascular mortality compared to patients with AF alone. Consequently, employing rhythm control strategies such as AF catheter ablation could offer substantial benefits to patients with COPD. However, the impact of COPD on AF ablation outcomes is not well established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center case control study, we retrospectively analyzed 200 patients with AF and COPD, 52 of whom underwent AF catheter ablation. Those who underwent ablation were matched with a control group of patients with AF but without COPD who underwent ablation. Ablation outcomes were compared between the groups. Univariate and multivariable analysis were conducted for prediction of AF recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the controls, cases with COPD were more likely to have AF recurrence following catheter ablation (OR 13.42, P-value = 0.0001). Multivariable analysis revealed predictors of AF recurrence following catheter ablation included decreased use of loop diuretics and amiodarone. Patients with severe or very severe COPD were more likely to have left atrial enlargement than patients with mild or moderate COPD (OR 2.28, P-value = 0.026).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with AF and COPD were more likely than patients with AF but without COPD to experience AF recurrence following catheter ablation. Predictors of AF recurrence included decreased use of loop diuretics and amiodarone. Our study demonstrates that while ablation in patients with COPD is safe, ablation in patients with COPD is associated with higher AF recurrence rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":35900,"journal":{"name":"Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2025.09.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at increased risk of cardiovascular mortality compared to patients with AF alone. Consequently, employing rhythm control strategies such as AF catheter ablation could offer substantial benefits to patients with COPD. However, the impact of COPD on AF ablation outcomes is not well established.

Methods: In this single-center case control study, we retrospectively analyzed 200 patients with AF and COPD, 52 of whom underwent AF catheter ablation. Those who underwent ablation were matched with a control group of patients with AF but without COPD who underwent ablation. Ablation outcomes were compared between the groups. Univariate and multivariable analysis were conducted for prediction of AF recurrence.

Results: Compared to the controls, cases with COPD were more likely to have AF recurrence following catheter ablation (OR 13.42, P-value = 0.0001). Multivariable analysis revealed predictors of AF recurrence following catheter ablation included decreased use of loop diuretics and amiodarone. Patients with severe or very severe COPD were more likely to have left atrial enlargement than patients with mild or moderate COPD (OR 2.28, P-value = 0.026).

Conclusion: Patients with AF and COPD were more likely than patients with AF but without COPD to experience AF recurrence following catheter ablation. Predictors of AF recurrence included decreased use of loop diuretics and amiodarone. Our study demonstrates that while ablation in patients with COPD is safe, ablation in patients with COPD is associated with higher AF recurrence rates.

慢性阻塞性肺疾病与导管消融后房颤复发率升高相关
背景:合并心房颤动(AF)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的患者与单独合并心房颤动(AF)的患者相比,心血管死亡风险增加。因此,采用心律控制策略,如房颤导管消融可以为COPD患者提供实质性的益处。然而,COPD对房颤消融结果的影响尚未得到很好的证实。方法:在这项单中心病例对照研究中,我们回顾性分析了200例房颤合并COPD患者,其中52例接受房颤导管消融治疗。接受消融术的患者与接受消融术的AF但无COPD的对照组患者相匹配。比较两组消融结果。单因素和多因素分析预测房颤复发。结果:与对照组相比,COPD患者导管消融后房颤复发的可能性更大(OR 13.42, p值=0.0001)。多变量分析显示,导管消融后房颤复发的预测因素包括环形利尿剂和胺碘酮的使用减少。重度或极重度COPD患者左房扩大发生率高于轻、中度COPD患者(or 2.28, p值=0.026)。结论:房颤合并慢性阻塞性肺病患者比房颤合并慢性阻塞性肺病患者在导管消融后房颤复发的可能性更大。房颤复发的预测因素包括减少环形利尿剂和胺碘酮的使用。我们的研究表明,虽然慢性阻塞性肺病患者的消融是安全的,但慢性阻塞性肺病患者的消融与更高的房颤复发率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal is a peer reviewed online journal devoted to cardiac pacing and electrophysiology. Editorial Advisory Board includes eminent personalities in the field of cardiac pacing and electrophysiology from Asia, Australia, Europe and North America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信