Application of preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction in single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic complex segmentectomy: a propensity matching analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Hao Chen, Wenjie Yuan, Zhonghua Wu, Wenxin Liang, Yuanpu Wei, Yu Huang, Chun Chen, Guobing Xu
{"title":"Application of preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction in single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic complex segmentectomy: a propensity matching analysis.","authors":"Hao Chen, Wenjie Yuan, Zhonghua Wu, Wenxin Liang, Yuanpu Wei, Yu Huang, Chun Chen, Guobing Xu","doi":"10.1186/s12957-025-03969-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the popularity of LDCT screening, more and more small lung cancers have been found, and segmentectomy has been widely used because of its advantages in the treatment of early lung cancer, but the feasibility of segmentectomy is still controversial because of the increased complexity of the operation. Especially in complex lung segment surgery, it is more controversial. Preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction (3DR) is one of the effective methods to ensure the smooth operation, but its role in complex segmentectomy has not yet been verified. This article aims to evaluate the value of preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction in complex pulmonary segmentectomy by retrospective analysis of preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction assisted single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic complex pulmonary segmentectomy and comparison of surgical related indicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of patients with lung cancers who underwent single-port thoracoscopic complex segmentectomy (n = 299) from August 2015 to February 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, including 156 patients in the preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction group and 143 patients in the non-three-dimensional reconstruction group. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups after comparative propensity score matching analysis (PSM) according to patient age, gender, BMI, lung function, smoking history, major tumor components, and tumor size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 125 patients in each group after PSM, and the baseline characteristics of patients were comparable. There were no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, smoking history, tumor histology and tumor size between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Lymph node dissection (9.4 ± 5.1 vs. 10.6 ± 7.0), postoperative drainage volume (510.5 ± 279.4 ml vs. 528.7 ± 379.4 ml), indwelling time of chest tube (2.3 ± 1.1d vs. 2.5 ± 1.6 d), and the incidence of chronic air leaks (0.8% vs. 0.8%), total complications (2.4% vs. 5.6%), 30-day postoperative mortality (0% vs. 0%) were not statistically different between the two groups. The operative time of preoperative 3DR group (178.6 ± 50.5 min vs. 202.1 ± 51.4 min), intraoperative blood loss (47.6 ± 37.9 ml vs. 58.4 ± 36.2 ml) compared with the control group (non-3DR), the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to evaluate the usefulness of preoperative 3D reconstruction in complex segmentectomy. The results showed that the use of preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction for complex pulmonary segmentectomy was a safe and effective method, which could significantly reduce the operation time and blood loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"23 1","pages":"349"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482376/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03969-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the popularity of LDCT screening, more and more small lung cancers have been found, and segmentectomy has been widely used because of its advantages in the treatment of early lung cancer, but the feasibility of segmentectomy is still controversial because of the increased complexity of the operation. Especially in complex lung segment surgery, it is more controversial. Preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction (3DR) is one of the effective methods to ensure the smooth operation, but its role in complex segmentectomy has not yet been verified. This article aims to evaluate the value of preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction in complex pulmonary segmentectomy by retrospective analysis of preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction assisted single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic complex pulmonary segmentectomy and comparison of surgical related indicators.

Methods: The clinical data of patients with lung cancers who underwent single-port thoracoscopic complex segmentectomy (n = 299) from August 2015 to February 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, including 156 patients in the preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction group and 143 patients in the non-three-dimensional reconstruction group. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups after comparative propensity score matching analysis (PSM) according to patient age, gender, BMI, lung function, smoking history, major tumor components, and tumor size.

Results: There were 125 patients in each group after PSM, and the baseline characteristics of patients were comparable. There were no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, smoking history, tumor histology and tumor size between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Lymph node dissection (9.4 ± 5.1 vs. 10.6 ± 7.0), postoperative drainage volume (510.5 ± 279.4 ml vs. 528.7 ± 379.4 ml), indwelling time of chest tube (2.3 ± 1.1d vs. 2.5 ± 1.6 d), and the incidence of chronic air leaks (0.8% vs. 0.8%), total complications (2.4% vs. 5.6%), 30-day postoperative mortality (0% vs. 0%) were not statistically different between the two groups. The operative time of preoperative 3DR group (178.6 ± 50.5 min vs. 202.1 ± 51.4 min), intraoperative blood loss (47.6 ± 37.9 ml vs. 58.4 ± 36.2 ml) compared with the control group (non-3DR), the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: This is the first study to evaluate the usefulness of preoperative 3D reconstruction in complex segmentectomy. The results showed that the use of preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction for complex pulmonary segmentectomy was a safe and effective method, which could significantly reduce the operation time and blood loss.

Abstract Image

术前三维重建在单孔胸腔镜复杂节段切除术中的应用:倾向匹配分析。
背景:随着LDCT筛查的普及,越来越多的小肺癌被发现,节段切除术因其在早期肺癌治疗中的优势而得到广泛应用,但由于手术复杂性的增加,节段切除术的可行性仍存在争议。尤其在复杂的肺段手术中,争议更大。术前三维重建(3DR)是保证手术顺利进行的有效方法之一,但其在复杂节段切除术中的作用尚未得到验证。本文通过对术前三维重建辅助单孔胸腔镜复杂肺段切除术的回顾性分析及手术相关指标的比较,评价术前三维重建在复杂肺段切除术中的价值。方法:回顾性分析2015年8月至2019年2月行单孔胸腔镜复杂节段切除术的肺癌患者(n = 299)的临床资料,其中术前三维重建组156例,非三维重建组143例。根据患者年龄、性别、BMI、肺功能、吸烟史、主要肿瘤成分、肿瘤大小等进行比较倾向评分匹配分析(PSM),比较两组围手术期结局。结果:PSM后各组125例,患者基线特征具有可比性。两组患者在年龄、性别、BMI、吸烟史、肿瘤组织学、肿瘤大小等方面差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组患者淋巴结清扫(9.4±5.1比10.6±7.0)、术后引流量(510.5±279.4 ml比528.7±379.4 ml)、胸管留置时间(2.3±1.1d比2.5±1.6 d)、慢性漏气发生率(0.8%比0.8%)、总并发症发生率(2.4%比5.6%)、术后30天死亡率(0%比0%)差异均无统计学意义。术前3DR组手术时间(178.6±50.5 min vs. 202.1±51.4 min),术中出血量(47.6±37.9 ml vs. 58.4±36.2 ml)与对照组(非3DR)相比,差异有统计学意义(P)结论:本研究首次评价了术前3D重建在复杂节段切除术中的有效性。结果表明,术前三维重建用于复杂肺段切除术是一种安全有效的方法,可显著减少手术时间和出血量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信