Effects of enhanced recovery after surgery on postoperative intestinal function and intestinal flora during laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Xiao-Jie Lin, Jia-Ze Xu, Qiang Hu, Jie Chen
{"title":"Effects of enhanced recovery after surgery on postoperative intestinal function and intestinal flora during laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery.","authors":"Xiao-Jie Lin, Jia-Ze Xu, Qiang Hu, Jie Chen","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.106286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have emerged as a promising approach in perioperative care. This study evaluated ERAS's impact on gastrointestinal recovery and microbiota composition following laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the impact of ERAS protocols on postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery and intestinal microbiota composition in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery, and to identify factors associated with improved clinical outcomes and microbial diversity preservation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 80 patients who underwent laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy, comparing ERAS (<i>n</i> = 40) <i>vs</i> traditional care (<i>n</i> = 40). Primary outcomes included postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery and complications. Intestinal microbiota was analyzed using 16S rRNA sequencing at multiple timepoints perioperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ERAS patients demonstrated faster recovery of bowel function, with earlier return of bowel sounds (16.25 ± 6.41 hours <i>vs</i> 22.3 ± 6.49 hours), first flatus (23.95 ± 6.02 hours <i>vs</i> 28.45 ± 7.12 hours), and defecation (34.95 ± 9.34 hours <i>vs</i> 48.1 ± 15.64 hours), all <i>P</i> < 0.05. Complication rates, including antibiotic-associated diarrhea and surgical site infections, were comparable between groups. Microbial diversity indices and probiotic populations showed better preservation in the ERAS group postoperatively (<i>P</i> < 0.05), though neither group achieved complete restoration to preoperative levels at one month.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results support tailoring ERAS protocols to prioritize gut microbiome resilience through early feeding and shortened antibiotic courses, with particular benefits for younger patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 9","pages":"106286"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476707/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.106286","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have emerged as a promising approach in perioperative care. This study evaluated ERAS's impact on gastrointestinal recovery and microbiota composition following laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery.

Aim: To evaluate the impact of ERAS protocols on postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery and intestinal microbiota composition in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery, and to identify factors associated with improved clinical outcomes and microbial diversity preservation.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 80 patients who underwent laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy, comparing ERAS (n = 40) vs traditional care (n = 40). Primary outcomes included postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery and complications. Intestinal microbiota was analyzed using 16S rRNA sequencing at multiple timepoints perioperatively.

Results: ERAS patients demonstrated faster recovery of bowel function, with earlier return of bowel sounds (16.25 ± 6.41 hours vs 22.3 ± 6.49 hours), first flatus (23.95 ± 6.02 hours vs 28.45 ± 7.12 hours), and defecation (34.95 ± 9.34 hours vs 48.1 ± 15.64 hours), all P < 0.05. Complication rates, including antibiotic-associated diarrhea and surgical site infections, were comparable between groups. Microbial diversity indices and probiotic populations showed better preservation in the ERAS group postoperatively (P < 0.05), though neither group achieved complete restoration to preoperative levels at one month.

Conclusion: These results support tailoring ERAS protocols to prioritize gut microbiome resilience through early feeding and shortened antibiotic courses, with particular benefits for younger patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

腹腔镜胃癌手术中增强术后恢复对术后肠道功能和肠道菌群的影响。
背景:增强术后恢复(ERAS)方案已成为围手术期护理的一种很有前途的方法。本研究评估了ERAS对腹腔镜胃癌手术后胃肠道恢复和微生物群组成的影响。目的:评价ERAS方案对腹腔镜胃癌手术患者术后胃肠功能恢复和肠道菌群组成的影响,并确定改善临床预后和微生物多样性保存的相关因素。方法:我们对80例行腹腔镜D2胃切除术的患者进行回顾性分析,比较ERAS (n = 40)和传统治疗(n = 40)。主要结局包括术后胃肠功能恢复和并发症。采用16S rRNA测序法分析围手术期多个时间点的肠道菌群。结果:ERAS患者肠功能恢复较快,肠音恢复较早(16.25±6.41 h vs 22.3±6.49 h),首次放屁较早(23.95±6.02 h vs 28.45±7.12 h),排便较早(34.95±9.34 h vs 48.1±15.64 h), P均< 0.05。并发症发生率,包括抗生素相关性腹泻和手术部位感染,两组间比较。ERAS组术后微生物多样性指数和益生菌种群保存较好(P < 0.05),但两组术后1个月均未完全恢复到术前水平。结论:这些结果支持定制ERAS方案,通过早期喂养和缩短抗生素疗程来优先考虑肠道微生物组的恢复能力,特别是对年轻患者有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信