Clinical application value of narrative nursing model in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Li-Na Shi, Liang Wang, Yu-Bo Gao, Dong-Hua Ma, Yu-Ling Mao, Ya-Qin Wang, Yue Wang, Qi-Xian Guo, Rui-Min He, Jia-Ming Chen
{"title":"Clinical application value of narrative nursing model in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.","authors":"Li-Na Shi, Liang Wang, Yu-Bo Gao, Dong-Hua Ma, Yu-Ling Mao, Ya-Qin Wang, Yue Wang, Qi-Xian Guo, Rui-Min He, Jia-Ming Chen","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.106514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Narrative nursing uses narrative methods to establish an interaction between nursing staff and patients, in which the experience of the patient's illness is understood and comprehended. By listening, the patient's understanding, comprehension, and acceptance of their own disease symptoms, quality of life, and living conditions are understood, thereby providing a basis for formulating corresponding nursing plans for the patient, further promoting the psychological and physical rehabilitation of the patient.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the impact of the new narrative nursing model on postoperative recovery, psychological status, and satisfaction of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 108 patients with resectable gastric cancer who were treated from January 2024 to December 2024 were selected as the study subjects. They were divided into a routine nursing group and a narrative nursing group using a random number table method. Postoperative recovery indicators were compared between the two groups, and questionnaires and position and postoperative nausea and vomiting were conducted on the day of discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were statistically significant differences in visual analogue scale pain scores at 12-96 hours postoperatively, the time of first ambulation postoperatively, and the length of postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences in postoperative self-rating anxiety scale, self-rating depression scale, and satisfaction scores between the two groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Further analysis using a binary logistic regression model found that the new narrative nursing model adopted postoperatively could improve patients' satisfaction with the work of nursing staff during their hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new narrative nursing model not only eliminated the negative emotions of patients, but also further promoted their postoperative recovery, and gained patients' trust and satisfaction with the nursing staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 9","pages":"106514"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.106514","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Narrative nursing uses narrative methods to establish an interaction between nursing staff and patients, in which the experience of the patient's illness is understood and comprehended. By listening, the patient's understanding, comprehension, and acceptance of their own disease symptoms, quality of life, and living conditions are understood, thereby providing a basis for formulating corresponding nursing plans for the patient, further promoting the psychological and physical rehabilitation of the patient.

Aim: To explore the impact of the new narrative nursing model on postoperative recovery, psychological status, and satisfaction of patients.

Methods: A total of 108 patients with resectable gastric cancer who were treated from January 2024 to December 2024 were selected as the study subjects. They were divided into a routine nursing group and a narrative nursing group using a random number table method. Postoperative recovery indicators were compared between the two groups, and questionnaires and position and postoperative nausea and vomiting were conducted on the day of discharge.

Results: There were statistically significant differences in visual analogue scale pain scores at 12-96 hours postoperatively, the time of first ambulation postoperatively, and the length of postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (P < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences in postoperative self-rating anxiety scale, self-rating depression scale, and satisfaction scores between the two groups (P < 0.05). Further analysis using a binary logistic regression model found that the new narrative nursing model adopted postoperatively could improve patients' satisfaction with the work of nursing staff during their hospitalization.

Conclusion: The new narrative nursing model not only eliminated the negative emotions of patients, but also further promoted their postoperative recovery, and gained patients' trust and satisfaction with the nursing staff.

Abstract Image

叙事式护理模式在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中的临床应用价值。
背景:叙事性护理运用叙事性的方法,在护理人员和患者之间建立一种互动,在这种互动中,患者的疾病体验得到理解和理解。通过倾听,了解患者对自身疾病症状、生活质量、生活状况的理解、理解和接受程度,从而为制定患者相应的护理计划提供依据,进一步促进患者的心理和身体康复。目的:探讨叙事式护理新模式对患者术后康复、心理状态及满意度的影响。方法:选择2024年1月至2024年12月接受手术治疗的可切除胃癌患者108例作为研究对象。采用随机数字表法将患者分为常规护理组和叙事护理组。比较两组患者术后恢复指标,并于出院当天进行问卷调查、体位及术后恶心呕吐情况。结果:两组患者术后12 ~ 96 h视觉模拟量表疼痛评分、术后首次下床时间、住院时间比较,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组患者术后焦虑自评量表、抑郁自评量表及满意度评分比较,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。进一步采用二元logistic回归模型分析发现,术后采用新的叙事式护理模式可以提高患者对护理人员住院期间工作的满意度。结论:新的叙事式护理模式不仅消除了患者的负面情绪,而且进一步促进了患者的术后恢复,获得了患者对护理人员的信任和满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信