Validation of the Hong Kong version of Abe's behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia score among care home residents with dementia.

Q3 Medicine
W T Yeung, H Y Yung, W C Chan
{"title":"Validation of the Hong Kong version of Abe's behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia score among care home residents with dementia.","authors":"W T Yeung, H Y Yung, W C Chan","doi":"10.12809/eaap2525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To translate and validate the Hong Kong version of Abe's behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) score (HK-ABS) and examine its psychometric properties among older adults with dementia in Hong Kong care homes, and to examine correlations among BPSD items, patient and caregiver characteristics, and caregiver distress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The content validity of the HK-ABS was assessed by a panel of three psychiatrists, one psychiatric nurse, one occupational therapist, and one medical social worker. Concurrent and discriminant validity of the HK-ABS were assessed using the Chinese or Hong Kong version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home (CNPI-NH), the Disability Assessment for Dementia, the Clinical Dementia Rating, and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability were determined. Exploratory factor analysis examined possible constructs by principal component analysis with varimax rotation. Factor extraction was based on Kaiser's eigenvalue criterion. Correlations between the HK-ABS and characteristics of patients and staff caregivers were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 109 pairs of patients with major neurocognitive disorder and staff caregivers in care homes were included in the analysis. The median time to complete the HK-ABS was 70 seconds. The median HK-ABS score was 4. Internal consistency of the HK-ABS was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.787); item-total correlations (excluding 'apathy and indifference') ranged from 0.337 to 0.653. The test-retest reliability (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.981, p = 0.168) and inter-rater reliability (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.987, p = 0.414) of the HK-ABS was excellent. For concurrent validity, the HK-ABS was highly correlated with the CNPI-NH (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.857, p < 0.001). For discriminant validity, the HK-ABS was not correlated with the Chinese or Hong Kong version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.103), the Disability Assessment for Dementia (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = -0.039), or the Clinical Dementia Rating (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.067). In exploratory factor analysis, all items achieved factor loadings of >0.4. Three factors explained 70% of the variance. The HK-ABS was negatively correlated with work experience (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = -0.254, p = 0.008) and positively correlated with the length of hospital stay in the previous year (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.193, p = 0.044) and the CNPI-NH occupational disruptive score (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.759, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The HK-ABS is a valid and reliable global assessment tool of BPSD for residential care settings and clinical communication. It may be used to identify caregiver distress to allow for early intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":39171,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry","volume":"35 3","pages":"153-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12809/eaap2525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To translate and validate the Hong Kong version of Abe's behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) score (HK-ABS) and examine its psychometric properties among older adults with dementia in Hong Kong care homes, and to examine correlations among BPSD items, patient and caregiver characteristics, and caregiver distress.

Methods: The content validity of the HK-ABS was assessed by a panel of three psychiatrists, one psychiatric nurse, one occupational therapist, and one medical social worker. Concurrent and discriminant validity of the HK-ABS were assessed using the Chinese or Hong Kong version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home (CNPI-NH), the Disability Assessment for Dementia, the Clinical Dementia Rating, and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability were determined. Exploratory factor analysis examined possible constructs by principal component analysis with varimax rotation. Factor extraction was based on Kaiser's eigenvalue criterion. Correlations between the HK-ABS and characteristics of patients and staff caregivers were examined.

Results: In total, 109 pairs of patients with major neurocognitive disorder and staff caregivers in care homes were included in the analysis. The median time to complete the HK-ABS was 70 seconds. The median HK-ABS score was 4. Internal consistency of the HK-ABS was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.787); item-total correlations (excluding 'apathy and indifference') ranged from 0.337 to 0.653. The test-retest reliability (rs = 0.981, p = 0.168) and inter-rater reliability (rs = 0.987, p = 0.414) of the HK-ABS was excellent. For concurrent validity, the HK-ABS was highly correlated with the CNPI-NH (rs = 0.857, p < 0.001). For discriminant validity, the HK-ABS was not correlated with the Chinese or Hong Kong version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (rs = 0.103), the Disability Assessment for Dementia (rs = -0.039), or the Clinical Dementia Rating (rs = 0.067). In exploratory factor analysis, all items achieved factor loadings of >0.4. Three factors explained 70% of the variance. The HK-ABS was negatively correlated with work experience (rs = -0.254, p = 0.008) and positively correlated with the length of hospital stay in the previous year (rs = 0.193, p = 0.044) and the CNPI-NH occupational disruptive score (rs = 0.759, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The HK-ABS is a valid and reliable global assessment tool of BPSD for residential care settings and clinical communication. It may be used to identify caregiver distress to allow for early intervention.

香港版阿贝氏失智症行为及心理症状评分在失智症长者中的验证。
目的:翻译和验证香港版本的阿贝氏痴呆行为和心理症状(BPSD)评分(HK-ABS),并研究其在香港养老院老年痴呆患者中的心理测量特性,并研究BPSD项目、患者和护理者特征以及护理者痛苦之间的相关性。方法:由3名精神科医生、1名精神科护士、1名职业治疗师和1名医务社工组成的小组对HK-ABS的内容效度进行评估。HK-ABS的并发效度和判别效度采用中文或香港版本的神经精神病学量表-养老院(CNPI-NH)、痴呆残疾评估、临床痴呆评分和蒙特利尔认知评估。测定重测信度和量表间信度。探索性因子分析通过主成分分析和最大旋转来检验可能的结构。因子提取基于Kaiser特征值准则。检验HK-ABS与患者及医护人员特征的相关性。结果:共纳入109对重性神经认知障碍患者和护理人员。完成HK-ABS测试的平均时间为70秒。HK-ABS评分中位数为4分。HK-ABS内部一致性较好(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.787);项目总相关性(不包括“冷漠和冷漠”)从0.337到0.653不等。HK-ABS的重测信度(rs = 0.981, p = 0.168)和评估间信度(rs = 0.987, p = 0.414)均较好。同时效度方面,HK-ABS与CNPI-NH高度相关(rs = 0.857, p < 0.001)。对于判别效度,HK-ABS与中文版或港版蒙特利尔认知评估(rs = 0.103)、失智能力评估(rs = -0.039)或临床失智评分(rs = 0.067)不相关。在探索性因子分析中,所有项目的因子负荷均达到bb0 0.4。三个因素解释了70%的差异。HK-ABS与工作经验呈负相关(rs = -0.254, p = 0.008),与前一年住院时间呈正相关(rs = 0.193, p = 0.044),与CNPI-NH职业破坏性评分呈正相关(rs = 0.759, p < 0.001)。结论:HK-ABS是一种有效、可靠的BPSD整体评估工具,可用于居家护理环境和临床交流。它可以用来识别照顾者的痛苦,以便进行早期干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
East Asian Archives of Psychiatry
East Asian Archives of Psychiatry Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信