{"title":"Prognostic immune nutritional index-based nutritional stratification enhances recovery and survival in gastric cancer: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Gang Wang, Sheng-Jie Pan","doi":"10.5306/wjco.v16.i9.110068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative malnutrition, systemic inflammation, and immune dysfunction significantly impair recovery and survival in gastric cancer patients undergoing radical gastrectomy. The Prognostic Immune Nutritional Index (PINI) enables immune-nutritional risk stratification; however, its utility in guiding perioperative nutritional support remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate whether risk-stratified perioperative nutritional support based on PINI scores improves postoperative recovery, quality of life, and long-term outcomes in gastric cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, 195 patients undergoing radical gastrectomy were stratified into low- (PINI ≤ 1.5), moderate- (1.5 < PINI ≤ 3), and high-risk (PINI > 3) groups. Patients received standard, intensive, or immune-enhancing nutritional support, respectively. Outcomes were assessed at 1 week, 1 month, and 1 year postoperatively and included body mass index (BMI), serum albumin, PINI scores, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, EORTC QLQ-C30 for quality of life, complication rates, hospital stay, and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 1 year, the high-risk group receiving immune-enhancing nutrition demonstrated the greatest improvements, with higher serum albumin (47.5 ± 3.8 g/L) and stabilized BMI (+0.1 ± 0.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup> <i>vs</i> -0.2 ± 0.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup> in the low-risk group, <i>P</i> < 0.01). Sleep quality (ΔPSQI: -8.5 ± 2.7), anxiety (ΔSAS: -12.9 ± 3.1), and depression (ΔSDS: -12.6 ± 4.2) improved significantly (all <i>P</i> < 0.01). Pain scores were lowest (VAS: 2.1 ± 1.3), and quality of life was highest (78.2 ± 8.0, <i>P</i> < 0.01). The high-risk group also had the lowest complication rate (3.3%), shortest hospital stay (9.8 ± 2.4 days), and highest 1-year survival (98.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PINI-based graded nutritional support significantly enhances postoperative recovery, reduces complications, and improves long-term outcomes following radical gastrectomy. These findings support its integration into precision perioperative care strategies for gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":23802,"journal":{"name":"World journal of clinical oncology","volume":"16 9","pages":"110068"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i9.110068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Postoperative malnutrition, systemic inflammation, and immune dysfunction significantly impair recovery and survival in gastric cancer patients undergoing radical gastrectomy. The Prognostic Immune Nutritional Index (PINI) enables immune-nutritional risk stratification; however, its utility in guiding perioperative nutritional support remains underexplored.
Aim: To evaluate whether risk-stratified perioperative nutritional support based on PINI scores improves postoperative recovery, quality of life, and long-term outcomes in gastric cancer patients.
Methods: In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, 195 patients undergoing radical gastrectomy were stratified into low- (PINI ≤ 1.5), moderate- (1.5 < PINI ≤ 3), and high-risk (PINI > 3) groups. Patients received standard, intensive, or immune-enhancing nutritional support, respectively. Outcomes were assessed at 1 week, 1 month, and 1 year postoperatively and included body mass index (BMI), serum albumin, PINI scores, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, EORTC QLQ-C30 for quality of life, complication rates, hospital stay, and survival.
Results: At 1 year, the high-risk group receiving immune-enhancing nutrition demonstrated the greatest improvements, with higher serum albumin (47.5 ± 3.8 g/L) and stabilized BMI (+0.1 ± 0.2 kg/m2vs -0.2 ± 0.2 kg/m2 in the low-risk group, P < 0.01). Sleep quality (ΔPSQI: -8.5 ± 2.7), anxiety (ΔSAS: -12.9 ± 3.1), and depression (ΔSDS: -12.6 ± 4.2) improved significantly (all P < 0.01). Pain scores were lowest (VAS: 2.1 ± 1.3), and quality of life was highest (78.2 ± 8.0, P < 0.01). The high-risk group also had the lowest complication rate (3.3%), shortest hospital stay (9.8 ± 2.4 days), and highest 1-year survival (98.5%, P < 0.05).
Conclusion: PINI-based graded nutritional support significantly enhances postoperative recovery, reduces complications, and improves long-term outcomes following radical gastrectomy. These findings support its integration into precision perioperative care strategies for gastric cancer.
期刊介绍:
The WJCO is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJCO is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of oncology. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJCO is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJCO are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in oncology. Scope: Art of Oncology, Biology of Neoplasia, Breast Cancer, Cancer Prevention and Control, Cancer-Related Complications, Diagnosis in Oncology, Gastrointestinal Cancer, Genetic Testing For Cancer, Gynecologic Cancer, Head and Neck Cancer, Hematologic Malignancy, Lung Cancer, Melanoma, Molecular Oncology, Neurooncology, Palliative and Supportive Care, Pediatric Oncology, Surgical Oncology, Translational Oncology, and Urologic Oncology.