Neonatal intensive care unit discharge education interventions and their effects on maternal sensitivity and neurocognitive development of premature infants: a protocol for a systematic review.

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Laidi Sulemani Msisiri, Nahya Salim Masoud, Golden Mwakibo Masika, Elizabeth Francis Msoka
{"title":"Neonatal intensive care unit discharge education interventions and their effects on maternal sensitivity and neurocognitive development of premature infants: a protocol for a systematic review.","authors":"Laidi Sulemani Msisiri, Nahya Salim Masoud, Golden Mwakibo Masika, Elizabeth Francis Msoka","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02907-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Premature babies often suffer fatal respiratory complications due to physiological brain immaturity and insufficient levels of surfactants in the lungs. To ensure their physiological stability and prevent perinatal death, all premature babies are recommended to receive enhanced life-saving care and monitoring in a neonatal intensive care unit. However, long-term hospital stays in the NICU may result in suboptimal mother-infant bonding, neonatal distress, neurological deficits, and severe psychosocial and behavioral complications. Research suggests that early intervention and comprehensive post-discharge health education can effectively support mothers and thus reduce these poor outcomes. However, there is significant variation in the design of interventions, the key components, the timing, and the measurement of the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will examine the educational discharge interventions provided to mothers whose babies were born below 37 weeks and admitted to the NICU. The review will include a search of studies in the EMBASE, CINAHL, Global Health, PubMed, and SCOPUS databases. We will include RCTs and controlled quasi-experimental studies published in English from the database's inception to November 2024. The Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for quasi-experimental research and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB-1) for RCTs will be used to evaluate the risk of bias. Data extraction will be done by two independent reviewers using Covidence software. Data synthesis will be done using the modified narrative synthesis approach. Quantitative data reported in three or more studies will be pooled for meta-analysis using IBM SPSS version 29. To determine the magnitude of the effect size of the intervention, we will compute odds ratios and weighted mean differences, along with their respective 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This systematic review will examine the impact of health education interventions in neonatal intensive care mothers on maternal bonding and infant neurodevelopmental outcomes. The results will inform the development of the most effective discharge education program, focusing on maternal-infant interaction, maternal sensitivity, and infant neural cognitive development for mothers of preterm infants graduating from the NICU.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024575785.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"181"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482676/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02907-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Premature babies often suffer fatal respiratory complications due to physiological brain immaturity and insufficient levels of surfactants in the lungs. To ensure their physiological stability and prevent perinatal death, all premature babies are recommended to receive enhanced life-saving care and monitoring in a neonatal intensive care unit. However, long-term hospital stays in the NICU may result in suboptimal mother-infant bonding, neonatal distress, neurological deficits, and severe psychosocial and behavioral complications. Research suggests that early intervention and comprehensive post-discharge health education can effectively support mothers and thus reduce these poor outcomes. However, there is significant variation in the design of interventions, the key components, the timing, and the measurement of the outcomes.

Methods: This review will examine the educational discharge interventions provided to mothers whose babies were born below 37 weeks and admitted to the NICU. The review will include a search of studies in the EMBASE, CINAHL, Global Health, PubMed, and SCOPUS databases. We will include RCTs and controlled quasi-experimental studies published in English from the database's inception to November 2024. The Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for quasi-experimental research and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB-1) for RCTs will be used to evaluate the risk of bias. Data extraction will be done by two independent reviewers using Covidence software. Data synthesis will be done using the modified narrative synthesis approach. Quantitative data reported in three or more studies will be pooled for meta-analysis using IBM SPSS version 29. To determine the magnitude of the effect size of the intervention, we will compute odds ratios and weighted mean differences, along with their respective 95% confidence intervals.

Discussion: This systematic review will examine the impact of health education interventions in neonatal intensive care mothers on maternal bonding and infant neurodevelopmental outcomes. The results will inform the development of the most effective discharge education program, focusing on maternal-infant interaction, maternal sensitivity, and infant neural cognitive development for mothers of preterm infants graduating from the NICU.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024575785.

Abstract Image

新生儿重症监护病房出院教育干预及其对早产儿产妇敏感性和神经认知发育的影响:一项系统评价方案。
背景:由于生理性脑发育不成熟和肺部表面活性剂水平不足,早产儿经常遭受致命的呼吸系统并发症。为了确保他们的生理稳定和防止围产期死亡,建议所有早产儿在新生儿重症监护病房接受加强的救生护理和监测。然而,在新生儿重症监护室长期住院可能导致母子关系不佳、新生儿窘迫、神经功能障碍以及严重的社会心理和行为并发症。研究表明,早期干预和全面的出院后健康教育可以有效地支持母亲,从而减少这些不良后果。然而,在干预措施的设计、关键组成部分、时间安排和结果测量方面存在显著差异。方法:本综述将探讨对37周以下新生儿入新生儿重症监护病房母亲的出院教育干预措施。该综述将包括在EMBASE、CINAHL、Global Health、PubMed和SCOPUS数据库中检索研究。我们将纳入从数据库建立到2024年11月以英文发表的随机对照试验和对照准实验研究。准实验研究的Joanna Briggs Institute检查表和随机对照试验的Cochrane风险偏倚工具(rob1)将被用于评估偏倚风险。数据提取将由两名独立审稿人使用covid - ence软件完成。数据综合将使用改进的叙述综合方法进行。在三个或更多的研究中报告的定量数据将使用IBM SPSS版本29进行荟萃分析。为了确定干预效果大小的大小,我们将计算比值比和加权平均差异,以及它们各自的95%置信区间。讨论:本系统综述将探讨新生儿重症监护母亲健康教育干预对母亲关系和婴儿神经发育结局的影响。研究结果将为制定最有效的出院教育计划提供信息,重点关注母婴互动、母亲敏感性和新生儿神经认知发展,以帮助新生儿重症监护室的早产儿母亲。系统评价注册:PROSPERO CRD42024575785。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信