Amatha Sreedevi, Elstin Anbu Raj, D Sreedhar, Virendra S Ligade
{"title":"Exploring the challenges faced by generic version of complex drugs: a scoping review.","authors":"Amatha Sreedevi, Elstin Anbu Raj, D Sreedhar, Virendra S Ligade","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02931-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complex generics can be defined by their complex active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), formulations, dosage forms, routes of administration, and drug device combinations which significantly pose challenges in scientific advancement and regulatory approvals. The present review aims to investigate, identify, and classify the critical challenges faced by different stakeholders and the strategies adopted to address these challenges across the developmental stage till the post-approval phases of complex generics.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for the Scoping Reviews Extension for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines for the systematic search conducted across various databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science (January 1, 2014, to August 22, 2024). English language articles that addressed various challenges as well as innovative strategic approaches were included in the study. Two authors independently reviewed the retrieved papers to reduce the possibility of bias. The screening was performed based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1718 studies were retrieved from the database searches, from which 24 met the eligibility criteria. The selected articles were from the USA, the European Union, India, Russia, Taiwan, China, and Malaysia. The formulation challenges (17 articles), analytical challenges (19 articles), clinical challenges (18 articles), critical process parameter-related challenges (17 articles), critical quality attribute-related challenges (19 articles), and regulatory challenges (21 articles) were the major challenges of complex generics. The use of advanced sophisticated analytical equipment as well as orthogonal bioanalytical testing, the implementation of a dynamic regulatory cross-checking system, the development and use of machine learning and artificial intelligence tools, and the development of quality-by-design approaches and models have been recognized as the best methods for addressing these challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review addresses critical gap by providing a systematic summary of stakeholder-reported barriers and novel mitigation approaches in the complex generics domain. It highlights the urgent need for harmonized global regulatory guidelines, advance analytical tools, and strategic stakeholder collaboration to hasten the development and availability of high-quality complex generics.</p><p><strong>Scoping review registration: </strong>The review was not registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"183"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02931-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Complex generics can be defined by their complex active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), formulations, dosage forms, routes of administration, and drug device combinations which significantly pose challenges in scientific advancement and regulatory approvals. The present review aims to investigate, identify, and classify the critical challenges faced by different stakeholders and the strategies adopted to address these challenges across the developmental stage till the post-approval phases of complex generics.
Method: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for the Scoping Reviews Extension for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines for the systematic search conducted across various databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science (January 1, 2014, to August 22, 2024). English language articles that addressed various challenges as well as innovative strategic approaches were included in the study. Two authors independently reviewed the retrieved papers to reduce the possibility of bias. The screening was performed based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Results: A total of 1718 studies were retrieved from the database searches, from which 24 met the eligibility criteria. The selected articles were from the USA, the European Union, India, Russia, Taiwan, China, and Malaysia. The formulation challenges (17 articles), analytical challenges (19 articles), clinical challenges (18 articles), critical process parameter-related challenges (17 articles), critical quality attribute-related challenges (19 articles), and regulatory challenges (21 articles) were the major challenges of complex generics. The use of advanced sophisticated analytical equipment as well as orthogonal bioanalytical testing, the implementation of a dynamic regulatory cross-checking system, the development and use of machine learning and artificial intelligence tools, and the development of quality-by-design approaches and models have been recognized as the best methods for addressing these challenges.
Conclusion: This review addresses critical gap by providing a systematic summary of stakeholder-reported barriers and novel mitigation approaches in the complex generics domain. It highlights the urgent need for harmonized global regulatory guidelines, advance analytical tools, and strategic stakeholder collaboration to hasten the development and availability of high-quality complex generics.
Scoping review registration: The review was not registered.
背景:复杂仿制药可以通过其复杂的活性药物成分(api)、配方、剂型、给药途径和药物器械组合来定义,这对科学进步和监管审批构成了重大挑战。本综述旨在调查、识别和分类不同利益相关者面临的关键挑战,以及在复杂仿制药的整个开发阶段直至批准后阶段为解决这些挑战所采取的策略。方法:我们在PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus和Web of Science等不同数据库(2014年1月1日至2024年8月22日)中进行系统检索,遵循系统评价和元分析范围评价扩展(PRISMA-ScR)指南的首选报告项目。研究中包括了解决各种挑战和创新战略方法的英语文章。两位作者独立审查了检索到的论文,以减少偏倚的可能性。筛选是根据预定的纳入和排除标准进行的。结果:从数据库检索中共检索到1718项研究,其中24项符合入选标准。入选文章来自美国、欧盟、印度、俄罗斯、台湾、中国和马来西亚。配方挑战(17篇文章)、分析挑战(19篇文章)、临床挑战(18篇文章)、关键工艺参数相关挑战(17篇文章)、关键质量属性相关挑战(19篇文章)和监管挑战(21篇文章)是复杂仿制药的主要挑战。使用先进的精密分析设备以及正交生物分析测试,实施动态监管交叉检查系统,开发和使用机器学习和人工智能工具,以及开发设计质量方法和模型,已被认为是应对这些挑战的最佳方法。结论:本综述通过系统总结利益相关者报告的复杂仿制药领域的障碍和新的缓解方法,解决了关键差距。它强调迫切需要统一的全球监管指南、先进的分析工具和战略利益相关者合作,以加快高质量复杂仿制药的开发和供应。范围审查注册:审查未注册。
期刊介绍:
Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.