{"title":"Who are people with psychosis delusional about? A study of social agents in the phenomenology of delusions.","authors":"Elisavet Pappa, Nichola Raihani, Vaughan Bell","doi":"10.1159/000548611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Delusions frequently involve strong beliefs about, or interactions with, illusory social agents. Although such agents have been systematically described in hallucinations, few studies have investigated their nature and identity in delusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 205 electronic mental health records describing the content of delusions from the Clinical Record Interactive Search (CRIS) platform at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. Delusional content was classified as non-social, implicitly social, or explicitly social. Descriptions of illusory social agents from explicitly social delusions were extracted and categorized using an upward coding analysis. A hierarchical cluster analysis identified distinct groupings of illusory social agents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most delusions (83.4%) contained explicit references to illusory social agents. Across 238 instances, we identified 220 distinct agent identities, with a mean of 1.17 agents per record. The majority were humans (85.1%), most often identified as family members (31.0%), followed by acquaintances (17.2%), religious figures (13.2%), unnamed persons (12.8%), professionals (11.8%), and cultural figures (10.9%). Hierarchical clustering revealed two distinct groups: one including socially proximate agents and the other more socially distant agents. These findings indicate a social gradient in delusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social content predominates in delusions, with patients experiencing delusions about socially closer individuals more frequently. We discuss the extent to which social gradient may not be unique to delusional misidentification syndromes but may instead represent a general feature of delusions. Better characterization of social agents in delusions could inform mechanistic accounts of these symptoms and, in clinical practice, guide family support and risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20723,"journal":{"name":"Psychopathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548611","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Delusions frequently involve strong beliefs about, or interactions with, illusory social agents. Although such agents have been systematically described in hallucinations, few studies have investigated their nature and identity in delusions.
Methods: We identified 205 electronic mental health records describing the content of delusions from the Clinical Record Interactive Search (CRIS) platform at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. Delusional content was classified as non-social, implicitly social, or explicitly social. Descriptions of illusory social agents from explicitly social delusions were extracted and categorized using an upward coding analysis. A hierarchical cluster analysis identified distinct groupings of illusory social agents.
Results: Most delusions (83.4%) contained explicit references to illusory social agents. Across 238 instances, we identified 220 distinct agent identities, with a mean of 1.17 agents per record. The majority were humans (85.1%), most often identified as family members (31.0%), followed by acquaintances (17.2%), religious figures (13.2%), unnamed persons (12.8%), professionals (11.8%), and cultural figures (10.9%). Hierarchical clustering revealed two distinct groups: one including socially proximate agents and the other more socially distant agents. These findings indicate a social gradient in delusions.
Conclusion: Social content predominates in delusions, with patients experiencing delusions about socially closer individuals more frequently. We discuss the extent to which social gradient may not be unique to delusional misidentification syndromes but may instead represent a general feature of delusions. Better characterization of social agents in delusions could inform mechanistic accounts of these symptoms and, in clinical practice, guide family support and risk assessment.
期刊介绍:
''Psychopathology'' is a record of research centered on findings, concepts, and diagnostic categories of phenomenological, experimental and clinical psychopathology. Studies published are designed to improve and deepen the knowledge and understanding of the pathogenesis and nature of psychopathological symptoms and psychological dysfunctions. Furthermore, the validity of concepts applied in the neurosciences of mental functions are evaluated in order to closely bring together the mind and the brain. Major topics of the journal are trajectories between biological processes and psychological dysfunction that can help us better understand a subject’s inner experiences and interpersonal behavior. Descriptive psychopathology, experimental psychopathology and neuropsychology, developmental psychopathology, transcultural psychiatry as well as philosophy-based phenomenology contribute to this field.