Emergency responders' return to work after injury/disease sustained during periods of extreme bushfires.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Janneke Berecki-Gisolf, Win Wah, Alex Collie, Deborah C Glass, Ryan F Hoy, Malcolm R Sim, Tim R Driscoll, Karen Walker-Bone
{"title":"Emergency responders' return to work after injury/disease sustained during periods of extreme bushfires.","authors":"Janneke Berecki-Gisolf, Win Wah, Alex Collie, Deborah C Glass, Ryan F Hoy, Malcolm R Sim, Tim R Driscoll, Karen Walker-Bone","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>While injuries/illnesses among emergency responders during extreme bushfires in Victoria, Australia, are well-documented, the impact of bushfire periods on return-to-work (RTW) outcomes is less understood. This study investigates whether workers' compensation claims lodged during extreme bushfire periods are associated with slower RTW, more lost work time and time-off-work relapse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Workers' compensation claims made by emergency responders in Victoria (Australia), 2005-2023, were analysed. Claims for injuries/diseases occurring during bushfire periods were compared with those made during non-bushfire periods. Time to first full RTW was determined from income compensation payments as time until first payment cessation of ≥10 days. RTW was analysed using Cox regression models. Compensated workdays and time-off-work relapse occurrences were modelled using generalised linear models and logistic regression, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 11 773 claims, 398 (3.4%) were lodged during extreme bushfires. Extreme bushfire period claims were associated with longer time to RTW (HR of 0.81, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.91). In extreme bushfire periods, median compensated days per claim were 74 (IQR 20, 346) versus 58 (18, 212) in other time periods. In the adjusted modelling, the count ratio for extreme bushfire periods (vs other time periods) was 1.13 (95%CI 1.01 to 1.27): a 13% increase in expected compensated days. Time-off-work relapse occurrence was not significantly affected by extreme bushfire periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In emergency responders, bushfire period claims were associated with increased duration of time off work. Tailored RTW programmes that proactively gauge claim complexity associated with exposure to extreme bushfires, as well as provision of targeted services, should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"380-387"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-110170","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: While injuries/illnesses among emergency responders during extreme bushfires in Victoria, Australia, are well-documented, the impact of bushfire periods on return-to-work (RTW) outcomes is less understood. This study investigates whether workers' compensation claims lodged during extreme bushfire periods are associated with slower RTW, more lost work time and time-off-work relapse.

Methods: Workers' compensation claims made by emergency responders in Victoria (Australia), 2005-2023, were analysed. Claims for injuries/diseases occurring during bushfire periods were compared with those made during non-bushfire periods. Time to first full RTW was determined from income compensation payments as time until first payment cessation of ≥10 days. RTW was analysed using Cox regression models. Compensated workdays and time-off-work relapse occurrences were modelled using generalised linear models and logistic regression, respectively.

Results: Among 11 773 claims, 398 (3.4%) were lodged during extreme bushfires. Extreme bushfire period claims were associated with longer time to RTW (HR of 0.81, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.91). In extreme bushfire periods, median compensated days per claim were 74 (IQR 20, 346) versus 58 (18, 212) in other time periods. In the adjusted modelling, the count ratio for extreme bushfire periods (vs other time periods) was 1.13 (95%CI 1.01 to 1.27): a 13% increase in expected compensated days. Time-off-work relapse occurrence was not significantly affected by extreme bushfire periods.

Conclusion: In emergency responders, bushfire period claims were associated with increased duration of time off work. Tailored RTW programmes that proactively gauge claim complexity associated with exposure to extreme bushfires, as well as provision of targeted services, should be considered.

紧急救援人员在极端森林大火期间受伤/患病后重返工作岗位。
虽然在澳大利亚维多利亚州的极端森林火灾中,紧急救援人员受伤/疾病的记录很充分,但森林火灾期间对重返工作(RTW)结果的影响尚不清楚。本研究调查了在极端森林火灾期间提出的工人赔偿要求是否与更慢的RTW,更多的工作时间损失和请假复发有关。方法:对2005-2023年澳大利亚维多利亚州应急人员提出的工人赔偿索赔进行分析。对森林火灾期间发生的伤害/疾病索赔与非森林火灾期间提出的索赔进行了比较。从收入补偿支付开始到第一次全全RTW的时间为第一次付款停止≥10天的时间。RTW采用Cox回归模型进行分析。补偿工作日和下班复发率分别使用广义线性模型和逻辑回归进行建模。结果:在11773起索赔中,398起(3.4%)是在极端森林火灾期间提出的。极端森林火灾期间索赔与较长的RTW时间相关(HR为0.81,95% CI为0.73至0.91)。在极端森林火灾时期,每宗索赔的中位数赔偿天数为74天(IQR 20,346),而在其他时期为58天(18,212)。在调整后的模型中,极端森林大火时期(与其他时期相比)的计数比为1.13 (95%CI 1.01至1.27):预期补偿天数增加了13%。极端林火期对下班复发率无显著影响。结论:在紧急救援人员中,森林火灾期间的索赔与休假时间的增加有关。应考虑量身定制的RTW方案,主动衡量与极端森林火灾有关的索赔复杂性,并提供有针对性的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine is an international peer reviewed journal covering current developments in occupational and environmental health worldwide. Occupational and Environmental Medicine publishes high-quality research relating to the full range of chemical, physical, ergonomic, biological and psychosocial hazards in the workplace and to environmental contaminants and their health effects. The journal welcomes research aimed at improving the evidence-based practice of occupational and environmental research; including the development and application of novel biological and statistical techniques in addition to evaluation of interventions in controlling occupational and environmental risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信