Psychosocial interventions to improve tuberculosis preventive treatment uptake and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Ida A A Parwitha, Vania D Djunaidy, Sofa D Alfian, Hari Setyowibowo, Ivan S Pradipta
{"title":"Psychosocial interventions to improve tuberculosis preventive treatment uptake and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review.","authors":"Ida A A Parwitha, Vania D Djunaidy, Sofa D Alfian, Hari Setyowibowo, Ivan S Pradipta","doi":"10.1038/s41533-025-00449-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite its importance in global TB elimination, tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) remains underutilized. Psychosocial barriers significantly contribute to this issue. This systematic review aims primarily to synthesize psychosocial interventions to improve the initiation of TPT. We analyzed psychosocial outcomes as secondary objectives when relevant data were available. This review included studies indexed in PubMed, Scopus, and PsycInfo until August 25, 2025. Original studies addressing psychosocial interventions for people with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) indicated for TPT were included in this review. The risk of bias was assessed via the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool (CCAT). A narrative synthesis summarized the characteristics of interventions, including the format of delivery, settings, intervention providers, psychosocial content, duration, and outcomes. Among the 1725 identified studies, nine (14,428 participants) met the inclusion criteria. The CCAT classification was moderate to high quality, with strengths in clearly articulated study rationales but weaknesses in study design. Most studies were from upper-middle-income countries with a high burden of TB; none were from Asia. Health education is a core component, often incorporating culturally adapted survivor testimonials to reduce stigma and increase motivation. Interventions were mostly community-based and led by multidisciplinary healthcare professionals and community workers. TPT initiation improved in all included studies, with risk differences ranging from 10-52%. This review emphasizes the potential of psychosocial interventions in supporting behavior change and increasing TPT initiation. Methodological limitations and a lack of research in high-burden Asian contexts restrict the current evidence. Future studies should focus on developing rigorous, contextually appropriate strategies for scalable psychosocial interventions that are effective and sustainable.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12480859/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-025-00449-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite its importance in global TB elimination, tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) remains underutilized. Psychosocial barriers significantly contribute to this issue. This systematic review aims primarily to synthesize psychosocial interventions to improve the initiation of TPT. We analyzed psychosocial outcomes as secondary objectives when relevant data were available. This review included studies indexed in PubMed, Scopus, and PsycInfo until August 25, 2025. Original studies addressing psychosocial interventions for people with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) indicated for TPT were included in this review. The risk of bias was assessed via the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool (CCAT). A narrative synthesis summarized the characteristics of interventions, including the format of delivery, settings, intervention providers, psychosocial content, duration, and outcomes. Among the 1725 identified studies, nine (14,428 participants) met the inclusion criteria. The CCAT classification was moderate to high quality, with strengths in clearly articulated study rationales but weaknesses in study design. Most studies were from upper-middle-income countries with a high burden of TB; none were from Asia. Health education is a core component, often incorporating culturally adapted survivor testimonials to reduce stigma and increase motivation. Interventions were mostly community-based and led by multidisciplinary healthcare professionals and community workers. TPT initiation improved in all included studies, with risk differences ranging from 10-52%. This review emphasizes the potential of psychosocial interventions in supporting behavior change and increasing TPT initiation. Methodological limitations and a lack of research in high-burden Asian contexts restrict the current evidence. Future studies should focus on developing rigorous, contextually appropriate strategies for scalable psychosocial interventions that are effective and sustainable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

改善结核病预防治疗的社会心理干预和社会心理结果:系统回顾。
尽管结核病预防治疗在全球消除结核病方面具有重要意义,但它仍未得到充分利用。社会心理障碍在很大程度上促成了这一问题。本系统综述的主要目的是综合社会心理干预措施,以提高TPT的启动。当相关数据可用时,我们将社会心理结果作为次要目标进行分析。本综述包括2025年8月25日之前在PubMed、Scopus和PsycInfo中检索的研究。本综述纳入了针对潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)患者TPT的社会心理干预的原始研究。通过Crowe关键评估工具(CCAT)评估偏倚风险。叙述性综合总结了干预措施的特点,包括交付形式、环境、干预提供者、心理社会内容、持续时间和结果。在1725项确定的研究中,9项(14428名参与者)符合纳入标准。CCAT分类是中等到高质量的,其优势在于清晰的研究基础,但弱点在于研究设计。大多数研究来自结核病负担高的中高收入国家;没有一个来自亚洲。健康教育是一个核心组成部分,经常纳入适应文化的幸存者证词,以减少耻辱和增加动力。干预措施大多以社区为基础,由多学科保健专业人员和社区工作者领导。在所有纳入的研究中,TPT的启动都有所改善,风险差异在10-52%之间。这篇综述强调了社会心理干预在支持行为改变和增加TPT启动方面的潜力。方法学上的局限性和在亚洲高负担背景下缺乏研究限制了目前的证据。未来的研究应侧重于制定严格的、适合环境的策略,以进行有效和可持续的可扩展的社会心理干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine is an open access, online-only, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the primary care management of respiratory and respiratory-related allergic diseases. Papers published by the journal represent important advances of significance to specialists within the fields of primary care and respiratory medicine. We are particularly interested in receiving papers in relation to the following aspects of respiratory medicine, respiratory-related allergic diseases and tobacco control: epidemiology prevention clinical care service delivery and organisation of healthcare (including implementation science) global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信