The value of contrast-enhanced MRI in the selection of surgical approaches for recurrent lumbar disc herniation in full-endoscopic surgery.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Qingqing Xiao, Li Huang, Fuming Chu, Xiaosong Tang, Wen Wang, Yue Li
{"title":"The value of contrast-enhanced MRI in the selection of surgical approaches for recurrent lumbar disc herniation in full-endoscopic surgery.","authors":"Qingqing Xiao, Li Huang, Fuming Chu, Xiaosong Tang, Wen Wang, Yue Li","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03860-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assess the value of contrast-enhanced lumbar MRI in guiding the selection of surgical approaches for recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) treated with full-endoscopic surgery. Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed from 237 patients with RLDH who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced lumbar MRI. Surgical approaches were selected based on the location and degree of nucleus pulposus extrusion observed on MRI. The disc levels involved were as follows: L2/3 (1 case), L3/4 (11 cases), L4/5 (111 cases), and L5/S1 (114 cases). Surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stays, and surgical complications were recorded. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for low back and leg pain. All patients successfully underwent full-endoscopic discectomy. At one month postoperatively and at the final follow-up, VAS and ODI scores showed significant improvement compared to preoperative values (final follow-up vs. preoperative: lower back pain VAS [0.34 ± 0.50 vs. 2.54 ± 1.82], leg pain VAS [0.06 ± 0.29 vs. 5.53 ± 1.65], and ODI [0.51 ± 0.98 vs. 66.08 ± 47.14]). According to the modified MacNab criteria, outcomes were rated as excellent in 195 cases, good in 35, fair in 5, and poor in 2, yielding an excellent-to-good rate of 97.0%. No serious intraoperative, postoperative, or follow-up complications were observed. Contrast-enhanced lumbar MRI provides clear visualization of intraspinal anatomical structures in patients with RLDH, facilitating accurate preoperative determination of decompression boundaries. By assessing the spatial relationship between the reherniated nucleus pulposus and the pedicle, and incorporating iliac crest height and surgical history, the optimal surgical approach can be selected. This enables safe and effective removal of herniated disc material, adequate nerve root decompression, and favorable clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"673"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03860-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To assess the value of contrast-enhanced lumbar MRI in guiding the selection of surgical approaches for recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) treated with full-endoscopic surgery. Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed from 237 patients with RLDH who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced lumbar MRI. Surgical approaches were selected based on the location and degree of nucleus pulposus extrusion observed on MRI. The disc levels involved were as follows: L2/3 (1 case), L3/4 (11 cases), L4/5 (111 cases), and L5/S1 (114 cases). Surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stays, and surgical complications were recorded. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for low back and leg pain. All patients successfully underwent full-endoscopic discectomy. At one month postoperatively and at the final follow-up, VAS and ODI scores showed significant improvement compared to preoperative values (final follow-up vs. preoperative: lower back pain VAS [0.34 ± 0.50 vs. 2.54 ± 1.82], leg pain VAS [0.06 ± 0.29 vs. 5.53 ± 1.65], and ODI [0.51 ± 0.98 vs. 66.08 ± 47.14]). According to the modified MacNab criteria, outcomes were rated as excellent in 195 cases, good in 35, fair in 5, and poor in 2, yielding an excellent-to-good rate of 97.0%. No serious intraoperative, postoperative, or follow-up complications were observed. Contrast-enhanced lumbar MRI provides clear visualization of intraspinal anatomical structures in patients with RLDH, facilitating accurate preoperative determination of decompression boundaries. By assessing the spatial relationship between the reherniated nucleus pulposus and the pedicle, and incorporating iliac crest height and surgical history, the optimal surgical approach can be selected. This enables safe and effective removal of herniated disc material, adequate nerve root decompression, and favorable clinical outcomes.

对比增强MRI在全内镜手术中复发性腰椎间盘突出症手术入路选择中的价值。
目的探讨腰椎MRI增强成像在指导经全内窥镜手术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症手术入路选择中的价值。回顾性分析237例RLDH患者术前行对比增强腰椎MRI检查的临床资料。根据MRI观察到的髓核挤压位置和程度选择手术入路。涉及的椎间盘级别如下:L2/3(1例)、L3/4(11例)、L4/5(111例)和L5/S1(114例)。记录手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间和手术并发症。临床结果采用Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)对腰痛和腿痛进行评估。所有患者均成功行全内窥镜椎间盘切除术。术后1个月及末次随访时,VAS和ODI评分较术前有显著改善(末次随访与术前比较:腰痛VAS[0.34±0.50比2.54±1.82],腿痛VAS[0.06±0.29比5.53±1.65],ODI[0.51±0.98比66.08±47.14])。根据修改后的MacNab标准,结果为优秀195例,良好35例,一般5例,差2例,优良率为97.0%。术中、术后及随访均无严重并发症。对比增强腰椎MRI可清晰显示RLDH患者的椎管内解剖结构,有助于术前准确确定减压边界。通过评估髓核再突出与椎弓根的空间关系,结合髂嵴高度和手术史,选择最佳手术入路。这可以安全有效地去除椎间盘突出物,充分的神经根减压,获得良好的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信