Paolo Marchetti, Giuseppe Curigliano, Mauro Biffoni, Sara Lonardi, Simone Scagnoli, Lorenzo Fornaro, Valentina Guarneri, Ugo De Giorgi, Paolo Antonio Ascierto, Giovanni Blandino, Giulia D'Amati, Massimo Aglietta, Chiara Cremolini, Pierfranco Conte, Edoardo Crimini, Maurizio Ceracchi, Simona Pisegna, Sofia Verkhovskaia, Roberto Bordonaro, Sergio Bracarda, Giovanni Butturini, Lucia Del Mastro, Andrea DeCensi, Agnese Fabbri, Elisabetta Fenocchio, Stefania Gori, Giulio Metro, Annamaria Pessino, Daniele Pozzessere, Fabio Puglisi, Stefano Tamberi, Alberto Zambelli, Donatella Marino, Ettore Capoluongo, Federico Cappuzzo, Bruna Cerbelli, Giuseppe Giannini, Umberto Malapelle, Federica Mazzuca, Marianna Nuti, Giancarlo Pruneri, Maurizio Simmaco, Lidia Strigari, Giuseppe Tonini, Nello Martini, Andrea Botticelli
{"title":"Genomically matched therapy in advanced solid tumors: the randomized phase 2 ROME trial.","authors":"Paolo Marchetti, Giuseppe Curigliano, Mauro Biffoni, Sara Lonardi, Simone Scagnoli, Lorenzo Fornaro, Valentina Guarneri, Ugo De Giorgi, Paolo Antonio Ascierto, Giovanni Blandino, Giulia D'Amati, Massimo Aglietta, Chiara Cremolini, Pierfranco Conte, Edoardo Crimini, Maurizio Ceracchi, Simona Pisegna, Sofia Verkhovskaia, Roberto Bordonaro, Sergio Bracarda, Giovanni Butturini, Lucia Del Mastro, Andrea DeCensi, Agnese Fabbri, Elisabetta Fenocchio, Stefania Gori, Giulio Metro, Annamaria Pessino, Daniele Pozzessere, Fabio Puglisi, Stefano Tamberi, Alberto Zambelli, Donatella Marino, Ettore Capoluongo, Federico Cappuzzo, Bruna Cerbelli, Giuseppe Giannini, Umberto Malapelle, Federica Mazzuca, Marianna Nuti, Giancarlo Pruneri, Maurizio Simmaco, Lidia Strigari, Giuseppe Tonini, Nello Martini, Andrea Botticelli","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03918-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite recent advancements demonstrating the potential of tumor-agnostic biomarkers to guide effective therapies, randomized evidence supporting the clinical superiority of precision oncology approaches compared to standard therapies remains limited. The ROME trial was a multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 2 study comparing tailored treatment (TT) to standard of care (SoC) in patients with advanced solid tumors progressing after one or two lines of therapy. Comprehensive genomic profiling on tissue and blood was performed to identify actionable alterations. Overall response rate (ORR) was the primary endpoint, and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), time to next treatment (TTNT) and safety were the secondary endpoints. Between November 2020 and August 2023, 1,794 patients were screened, 897 were evaluated by the molecular tumor board (MTB) and 400 were randomized to TT or SoC. TT achieved a significantly higher ORR (17.5% versus 10%; P = 0.0294) and improved median PFS (3.5 months versus 2.8 months; hazard ratio = 0.66 (0.53-0.82), P = 0.0002). TT also showed superior 12-month PFS rates (22.0% versus 8.3%). Median OS was similar, with a 52% crossover rate. Grade 3/4 adverse events were also similar (40% TT versus 52% SoC). These results highlight the potential of TT to improve outcomes for patients with diverse actionable genomic alterations. These results also provide relevant evidence supporting a tumor-agnostic precision oncology strategy and highlight the potential of TTs, guided by genomic profiling and MTB recommendations, to significantly improve outcomes for patients with diverse actionable genomic alterations. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04591431 .</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03918-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite recent advancements demonstrating the potential of tumor-agnostic biomarkers to guide effective therapies, randomized evidence supporting the clinical superiority of precision oncology approaches compared to standard therapies remains limited. The ROME trial was a multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 2 study comparing tailored treatment (TT) to standard of care (SoC) in patients with advanced solid tumors progressing after one or two lines of therapy. Comprehensive genomic profiling on tissue and blood was performed to identify actionable alterations. Overall response rate (ORR) was the primary endpoint, and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), time to next treatment (TTNT) and safety were the secondary endpoints. Between November 2020 and August 2023, 1,794 patients were screened, 897 were evaluated by the molecular tumor board (MTB) and 400 were randomized to TT or SoC. TT achieved a significantly higher ORR (17.5% versus 10%; P = 0.0294) and improved median PFS (3.5 months versus 2.8 months; hazard ratio = 0.66 (0.53-0.82), P = 0.0002). TT also showed superior 12-month PFS rates (22.0% versus 8.3%). Median OS was similar, with a 52% crossover rate. Grade 3/4 adverse events were also similar (40% TT versus 52% SoC). These results highlight the potential of TT to improve outcomes for patients with diverse actionable genomic alterations. These results also provide relevant evidence supporting a tumor-agnostic precision oncology strategy and highlight the potential of TTs, guided by genomic profiling and MTB recommendations, to significantly improve outcomes for patients with diverse actionable genomic alterations. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04591431 .
期刊介绍:
Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors.
Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including:
-Case-reports and small case series
-Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4
-Observational studies
-Meta-analyses
-Biomarker studies
-Public and global health studies
Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.