Comparison of Collagen Cross-Linking Alone to 1% Povidone-Iodine Treatment of Refractory Corneal Ulcers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-09-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/joph/9559107
Mohammad-Hosein Validad, Soroush Jamshidian, Tahereh Rakhshandadi, Monireh Mahjoob
{"title":"Comparison of Collagen Cross-Linking Alone to 1% Povidone-Iodine Treatment of Refractory Corneal Ulcers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Mohammad-Hosein Validad, Soroush Jamshidian, Tahereh Rakhshandadi, Monireh Mahjoob","doi":"10.1155/joph/9559107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Corneal ulcer is one of the most common causes of corneal opacities. This study compared the effects of topical 1% povidone-iodine (PI) and corneal collagen cross-linking in patients with therapy-resistant corneal ulcers. <b>Methods:</b> This single-blind randomized clinical trial included patients referred to Al-Zahra Ophthalmology Hospital in Zahedan, Iran, from 2022 to 2024, who had corneal ulcers resistant to standard therapy. Participants were divided into two groups using stratified permuted block randomization method: one group received 1% PI and the other underwent corneal collagen cross-linking. Signs and symptoms were recorded before treatment and on days 1, 3, 7, and 28 posttreatment. Statistical analysis was performed using generalized estimating equations and repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). <b>Results:</b> Thirty patients, with a mean age of 52.23 ± 2.34 years, participated in this study. Both corneal collagen cross-linking and 1% PI treatments significantly reduced the wound area, stromal infiltration, hypopyon, corneal edema, eye itching, eye burning, and eye pain (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two treatments (<i>p</i> > 0.09). The improvement rate was 73.3% in the 1% PI group and 60% in the corneal collagen cross-linking group. <b>Conclusions:</b> Corneal collagen cross-linking and 1% PI demonstrated comparable efficacy in promoting healing of refractory corneal ulcers. Therefore, both methods may be considered for managing corneal ulcers that are resistant to standard therapy. <b>Trial Registration:</b> Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT): IRCT20221230056988N1.</p>","PeriodicalId":16674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"2025 ","pages":"9559107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476928/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/joph/9559107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Corneal ulcer is one of the most common causes of corneal opacities. This study compared the effects of topical 1% povidone-iodine (PI) and corneal collagen cross-linking in patients with therapy-resistant corneal ulcers. Methods: This single-blind randomized clinical trial included patients referred to Al-Zahra Ophthalmology Hospital in Zahedan, Iran, from 2022 to 2024, who had corneal ulcers resistant to standard therapy. Participants were divided into two groups using stratified permuted block randomization method: one group received 1% PI and the other underwent corneal collagen cross-linking. Signs and symptoms were recorded before treatment and on days 1, 3, 7, and 28 posttreatment. Statistical analysis was performed using generalized estimating equations and repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: Thirty patients, with a mean age of 52.23 ± 2.34 years, participated in this study. Both corneal collagen cross-linking and 1% PI treatments significantly reduced the wound area, stromal infiltration, hypopyon, corneal edema, eye itching, eye burning, and eye pain (p < 0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two treatments (p > 0.09). The improvement rate was 73.3% in the 1% PI group and 60% in the corneal collagen cross-linking group. Conclusions: Corneal collagen cross-linking and 1% PI demonstrated comparable efficacy in promoting healing of refractory corneal ulcers. Therefore, both methods may be considered for managing corneal ulcers that are resistant to standard therapy. Trial Registration: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT): IRCT20221230056988N1.

单独胶原交联与1%聚维酮碘治疗难治性角膜溃疡的比较:一项随机临床试验。
背景:角膜溃疡是引起角膜混浊最常见的原因之一。本研究比较了外用1%聚维酮碘(PI)和角膜胶原交联治疗难治性角膜溃疡患者的效果。方法:这项单盲随机临床试验纳入了2022年至2024年在伊朗扎黑丹Al-Zahra眼科医院转诊的角膜溃疡对标准治疗有耐药性的患者。采用分层排列块随机法将参与者分为两组:一组接受1% PI治疗,另一组接受角膜胶原交联治疗。记录治疗前及治疗后第1、3、7、28天的体征和症状。统计分析采用广义估计方程和重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)。结果:本组患者30例,平均年龄52.23±2.34岁。角膜胶原交联和1% PI处理均显著减少创面面积、间质浸润、低充血、角膜水肿、眼痒、眼灼烧和眼痛(p < 0.05)。但两组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。1% PI组改善率为73.3%,角膜胶原交联组改善率为60%。结论:角膜胶原交联和1% PI在促进难治性角膜溃疡愈合方面具有相当的疗效。因此,这两种方法都可以考虑用于治疗标准治疗无效的角膜溃疡。试验注册:伊朗临床试验注册中心(IRCT): IRCT20221230056988N1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ophthalmology
Journal of Ophthalmology MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-OPHTHALMOLOGY
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the anatomy, physiology and diseases of the eye. Submissions should focus on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, as well as clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信