Artificial Intelligence Deep Learning Ultrasound Discrimination of Cosmetic Fillers: A Multicenter Study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Ximena Wortsman, Manuel Lozano, Francisco Javier Rodriguez, Yessenia Valderrama, Gabriela Ortiz-Orellana, Luciana Zattar, Francisco de Cabo, Eliza Ducati, Rosa Sigrist, Claudia Fontan, Juliana Rezende, Claudia Gonzalez, Leonie Schelke, Julia Zavariz, Patricia Barrera, Peter Velthuis
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence Deep Learning Ultrasound Discrimination of Cosmetic Fillers: A Multicenter Study.","authors":"Ximena Wortsman, Manuel Lozano, Francisco Javier Rodriguez, Yessenia Valderrama, Gabriela Ortiz-Orellana, Luciana Zattar, Francisco de Cabo, Eliza Ducati, Rosa Sigrist, Claudia Fontan, Juliana Rezende, Claudia Gonzalez, Leonie Schelke, Julia Zavariz, Patricia Barrera, Peter Velthuis","doi":"10.1002/jum.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine, imaging, and dermatology, to date, there is no information on the use of AI for discriminating cosmetic fillers on ultrasound (US).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An international collaborative group working in dermatologic and esthetic US was formed and worked with the staff of the Department of Computer Science and AI of the Universidad de Granada to gather and process a relevant number of anonymized images. AI techniques based on deep learning (DL) with YOLO (you only look once) architecture, together with a bounding box annotation tool, allowed experts to manually delineate regions of interest for the discrimination of common cosmetic fillers under real-world conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 physicians from 6 countries participated in the AI study and compiled a final dataset comprising 1432 US images, including HA (hyaluronic acid), PMMA (polymethylmethacrylate), CaHA (calcium hydroxyapatite), and SO (silicone oil) filler cases. The model exhibits robust and consistent classification performance, with an average accuracy of 0.92 ± 0.04 across the cross-validation folds. YOLOv11 demonstrated outstanding performance in the detection of HA and SO, yielding F1 scores of 0.96 ± 0.02 and 0.94 ± 0.04, respectively. On the other hand, CaHA and PMMA show somewhat lower and less consistent performance in terms of precision and recall, with F1-scores around 0.83.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI using YOLOv11 allowed us to discriminate reliably between HA and SO using different complexity high-frequency US devices and operators. Further AI DL-specific work is needed to identify CaHA and PMMA more accurately.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.70079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Despite the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine, imaging, and dermatology, to date, there is no information on the use of AI for discriminating cosmetic fillers on ultrasound (US).

Methods: An international collaborative group working in dermatologic and esthetic US was formed and worked with the staff of the Department of Computer Science and AI of the Universidad de Granada to gather and process a relevant number of anonymized images. AI techniques based on deep learning (DL) with YOLO (you only look once) architecture, together with a bounding box annotation tool, allowed experts to manually delineate regions of interest for the discrimination of common cosmetic fillers under real-world conditions.

Results: A total of 14 physicians from 6 countries participated in the AI study and compiled a final dataset comprising 1432 US images, including HA (hyaluronic acid), PMMA (polymethylmethacrylate), CaHA (calcium hydroxyapatite), and SO (silicone oil) filler cases. The model exhibits robust and consistent classification performance, with an average accuracy of 0.92 ± 0.04 across the cross-validation folds. YOLOv11 demonstrated outstanding performance in the detection of HA and SO, yielding F1 scores of 0.96 ± 0.02 and 0.94 ± 0.04, respectively. On the other hand, CaHA and PMMA show somewhat lower and less consistent performance in terms of precision and recall, with F1-scores around 0.83.

Conclusions: AI using YOLOv11 allowed us to discriminate reliably between HA and SO using different complexity high-frequency US devices and operators. Further AI DL-specific work is needed to identify CaHA and PMMA more accurately.

人工智能深度学习超声识别化妆品填充剂:一项多中心研究。
目的:尽管人工智能(AI)在医学、成像和皮肤病学中的应用越来越多,但迄今为止,还没有关于使用人工智能在超声(US)上区分化妆品填充物的信息。方法:成立国际皮肤与美学合作小组,与西班牙格拉纳达大学计算机科学与人工智能系的工作人员合作,收集并处理相关数量的匿名图像。基于深度学习(DL)和YOLO(你只看一次)架构的人工智能技术,以及边界框注释工具,允许专家在现实世界条件下手动描绘感兴趣的区域,以区分常见的化妆品填充物。结果:来自6个国家的14名医生参与了AI研究,并编制了一个由1432张美国图像组成的最终数据集,包括HA(透明质酸)、PMMA(聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯)、CaHA(羟基磷灰石钙)和SO(硅油)填充病例。该模型具有鲁棒性和一致性的分类性能,跨交叉验证褶皱的平均准确率为0.92±0.04。YOLOv11在检测HA和SO方面表现出色,F1得分分别为0.96±0.02和0.94±0.04。另一方面,CaHA和PMMA在准确率和召回率方面表现出较低且不太一致的表现,f1得分约为0.83。结论:使用YOLOv11的AI使我们能够使用不同复杂的高频美国设备和操作员可靠地区分HA和SO。需要进一步的人工智能dl特异性工作来更准确地识别CaHA和PMMA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信