Menopausal hormone therapy for breast cancer patients: what is the current evidence?

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sarah Glynne, James Simon, Anthony Branson, Stephen Payne, Louise Newson, Isaac Manyonda, Susan Cleator, Michael Douek, Sasha Usiskin, Jeffrey S Tobias, Jayant S Vaidya
{"title":"Menopausal hormone therapy for breast cancer patients: what is the current evidence?","authors":"Sarah Glynne, James Simon, Anthony Branson, Stephen Payne, Louise Newson, Isaac Manyonda, Susan Cleator, Michael Douek, Sasha Usiskin, Jeffrey S Tobias, Jayant S Vaidya","doi":"10.1097/GME.0000000000002627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance and objectives: </strong>Many breast cancer survivors struggle with menopausal symptoms due to oncological treatment-induced hormone deficiency, or because they experience menopause some years after completing treatment, but have limited menopause treatment options. Estrogen replacement therapy is the most effective treatment for menopausal symptoms, but is not recommended after breast cancer because it can increase the risk of relapse. Our objectives were to review the evidence and develop a consensus statement to define the role of menopausal hormone therapy after breast cancer, and to highlight evidence gaps to inform future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 25-member multidisciplinary panel developed the consensus statements using a modified Delphi methodology. The panel consisted of 18 senior doctors who voted (5 GP menopause specialists, 5 gynecologists, 4 medical oncologists, 3 breast surgical oncologists, and 1 breast radiologist), and 7 members who did not vote (4 patient representatives, 1 medical oncologist, 1 urologist and 1 administrator). Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement with low-to-moderate variation in extent of agreement (mean absolute deviation from median of ≤0.75). We reviewed current evidence relating to use of vaginal and systemic menopausal hormone therapy (\"MHT\", also known as \"hormone therapy,\" \"HT\" or \"hormone replacement therapy,\" \"HRT\") after breast cancer diagnosis, and adjuvant endocrine (anti-estrogen) therapy, and developed a narrative synthesis. Finally, four additional breast cancer specialists peer-reviewed the manuscript.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>The panel agreed that some women may choose to take MHT, (off-label use) and accept an increased risk of relapse in exchange for relief from menopausal symptoms and an improved quality of life, and that preferences may vary according to individual circumstances and the absolute risk of relapse. All respondents agreed or strongly agreed with statements supporting shared decision making and individualized menopause care (MADM 0.29).In our review of the literature, we found mainly moderate quality evidence concerning use of vaginal and systemic estrogen after breast cancer, and high quality evidence concerning the benefits of anti-estrogen therapy for estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Based on the available data, we recommend that shared decisions are based on (1) an individual's menopausal symptoms and impact on quality of life, (2) the potential increase in an individual's risk of relapse by use of menopausal hormone therapy, and (3) patient preferences, views and treatment goals. Clinicians and patients can use our findings to make informed menopause treatment choices after breast cancer. We strongly recommend registering all patients considering MHT after breast cancer in a clinical study (eg, MENopausal hormone therapy and Outcomes After Breast Cancer, the MENO-ABC trial).</p>","PeriodicalId":18435,"journal":{"name":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002627","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance and objectives: Many breast cancer survivors struggle with menopausal symptoms due to oncological treatment-induced hormone deficiency, or because they experience menopause some years after completing treatment, but have limited menopause treatment options. Estrogen replacement therapy is the most effective treatment for menopausal symptoms, but is not recommended after breast cancer because it can increase the risk of relapse. Our objectives were to review the evidence and develop a consensus statement to define the role of menopausal hormone therapy after breast cancer, and to highlight evidence gaps to inform future research.

Methods: A 25-member multidisciplinary panel developed the consensus statements using a modified Delphi methodology. The panel consisted of 18 senior doctors who voted (5 GP menopause specialists, 5 gynecologists, 4 medical oncologists, 3 breast surgical oncologists, and 1 breast radiologist), and 7 members who did not vote (4 patient representatives, 1 medical oncologist, 1 urologist and 1 administrator). Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement with low-to-moderate variation in extent of agreement (mean absolute deviation from median of ≤0.75). We reviewed current evidence relating to use of vaginal and systemic menopausal hormone therapy ("MHT", also known as "hormone therapy," "HT" or "hormone replacement therapy," "HRT") after breast cancer diagnosis, and adjuvant endocrine (anti-estrogen) therapy, and developed a narrative synthesis. Finally, four additional breast cancer specialists peer-reviewed the manuscript.

Discussion and conclusions: The panel agreed that some women may choose to take MHT, (off-label use) and accept an increased risk of relapse in exchange for relief from menopausal symptoms and an improved quality of life, and that preferences may vary according to individual circumstances and the absolute risk of relapse. All respondents agreed or strongly agreed with statements supporting shared decision making and individualized menopause care (MADM 0.29).In our review of the literature, we found mainly moderate quality evidence concerning use of vaginal and systemic estrogen after breast cancer, and high quality evidence concerning the benefits of anti-estrogen therapy for estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Based on the available data, we recommend that shared decisions are based on (1) an individual's menopausal symptoms and impact on quality of life, (2) the potential increase in an individual's risk of relapse by use of menopausal hormone therapy, and (3) patient preferences, views and treatment goals. Clinicians and patients can use our findings to make informed menopause treatment choices after breast cancer. We strongly recommend registering all patients considering MHT after breast cancer in a clinical study (eg, MENopausal hormone therapy and Outcomes After Breast Cancer, the MENO-ABC trial).

绝经期激素治疗乳腺癌患者:目前的证据是什么?
重要性和目的:许多乳腺癌幸存者由于肿瘤治疗引起的激素缺乏而与更年期症状作斗争,或者因为他们在完成治疗几年后经历了更年期,但更年期治疗选择有限。雌激素替代疗法是治疗更年期症状最有效的方法,但不建议乳腺癌患者使用,因为它会增加复发的风险。我们的目的是回顾证据并形成共识,以确定乳腺癌后绝经期激素治疗的作用,并强调证据差距,为未来的研究提供信息。方法:一个由25名成员组成的多学科小组使用改进的德尔菲方法制定了共识声明。该小组由18名参与投票的资深医生(5名全科医生更年期专家、5名妇科医生、4名肿瘤内科医生、3名乳房外科肿瘤科医生和1名乳房放射科医生)和7名未投票的成员(4名患者代表、1名肿瘤内科医生、1名泌尿科医生和1名行政人员)组成。一致性定义为一致性≥70%,一致性程度的低至中度差异(平均绝对偏差与中位数的绝对值≤0.75)。我们回顾了目前有关乳腺癌诊断后使用阴道和全身绝经期激素治疗(“MHT”,也称为“激素治疗”,“HT”或“激素替代疗法”,“HRT”)和辅助内分泌(抗雌激素)治疗的证据,并进行了叙述综合。最后,另外四位乳腺癌专家对手稿进行了同行评审。讨论和结论:专家组一致认为,一些妇女可能选择服用MHT(标签外使用),并接受复发风险增加,以换取更年期症状的缓解和生活质量的改善,并且偏好可能根据个人情况和复发的绝对风险而变化。所有受访者都同意或强烈同意支持共同决策和个性化更年期护理的陈述(MADM 0.29)。在我们的文献回顾中,我们主要发现了中等质量的关于乳腺癌后使用阴道和全身雌激素的证据,以及高质量的关于抗雌激素治疗对雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌的益处的证据。根据现有的数据,我们建议共同的决定是基于(1)个体的更年期症状和对生活质量的影响,(2)使用更年期激素治疗可能增加个体复发的风险,以及(3)患者的偏好、观点和治疗目标。临床医生和患者可以利用我们的研究结果,在乳腺癌后做出明智的更年期治疗选择。我们强烈建议在临床研究中登记所有考虑乳腺癌后MHT的患者(例如,绝经期激素治疗和乳腺癌后预后,MENO-ABC试验)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Menopause, published monthly, provides a forum for new research, applied basic science, and clinical guidelines on all aspects of menopause. The scope and usefulness of the journal extend beyond gynecology, encompassing many varied biomedical areas, including internal medicine, family practice, medical subspecialties such as cardiology and geriatrics, epidemiology, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, and pharmacology. This forum is essential to help integrate these areas, highlight needs for future research, and enhance health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信