Comparison of Visual Field Fluctuation Between Myopic and Emmetropic Glaucoma Patients.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-09-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/joph/9948265
Molly Barten, Louis B Cantor
{"title":"Comparison of Visual Field Fluctuation Between Myopic and Emmetropic Glaucoma Patients.","authors":"Molly Barten, Louis B Cantor","doi":"10.1155/joph/9948265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Conflicting studies suggest that myopia may both increase and decrease the risk of developing glaucomatous visual field loss. To provide appropriate treatment, one must distinguish between visual field fluctuation, where variability occurs over days to weeks not due to pathological change, and true visual field progression. <b>Objective:</b> A retrospective, observational clinical study tests the hypothesis that myopic glaucoma patients demonstrate more long-term visual field fluctuation than emmetropic glaucoma patients. <b>Methods:</b> Four or more Humphrey visual field tests over several clinic visits were analyzed in 156 eyes. The visual field index (VFI) plot, mean deviation (MD), and threshold sensitivity on the glaucoma progression analysis were collected to quantify fluctuation. The sample had two groups: (1) emmetropic glaucoma eyes with a spherical equivalent refraction between +2 and -2 diopters and (2) high myopic glaucoma eyes with a spherical equivalent refraction ≤ -5 diopters. Two sample -tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests with random effect on subject using root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) were used to compare fluctuation. <b>Results:</b> RMSEA two sample -tests between 78 myopic and 78 emmetropic glaucoma eyes found that myopic glaucoma eyes demonstrated significant fluctuation for MD (<i>p</i> = 0.006) and VFI (<i>p</i> = 0.035) compared with emmetropic eyes. Although myopic eyes showed greater fluctuation in MD (1.504 ± 1.016) and VFI (0.037 ± 0.045) compared with emmetropic glaucoma eyes (MD = 1.125 ± 0.652) (VFI = 0.026 ± 0.019), threshold sensitivity analyses did not reach statistically significant differences (<i>p</i> = 0.054) between myopic (1.609 ± 1.022) and emmetropic glaucoma eyes (1.339 ± 0.687). One-way ANOVA tests found statistically significant MD and VFI fluctuation difference (MD = -0.29, <i>p</i> value = 0.01) (VFI = -0.30, <i>p</i> value = 0.03) but not threshold sensitivity fluctuation difference = -0.19 (<i>p</i> value = 0.11). <b>Conclusion:</b> The results for MD and VFI, but not threshold sensitivity, are consistent with the hypothesis that myopic patients demonstrate more visual field fluctuation than emmetropic glaucoma patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"2025 ","pages":"9948265"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476933/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/joph/9948265","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Conflicting studies suggest that myopia may both increase and decrease the risk of developing glaucomatous visual field loss. To provide appropriate treatment, one must distinguish between visual field fluctuation, where variability occurs over days to weeks not due to pathological change, and true visual field progression. Objective: A retrospective, observational clinical study tests the hypothesis that myopic glaucoma patients demonstrate more long-term visual field fluctuation than emmetropic glaucoma patients. Methods: Four or more Humphrey visual field tests over several clinic visits were analyzed in 156 eyes. The visual field index (VFI) plot, mean deviation (MD), and threshold sensitivity on the glaucoma progression analysis were collected to quantify fluctuation. The sample had two groups: (1) emmetropic glaucoma eyes with a spherical equivalent refraction between +2 and -2 diopters and (2) high myopic glaucoma eyes with a spherical equivalent refraction ≤ -5 diopters. Two sample -tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests with random effect on subject using root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) were used to compare fluctuation. Results: RMSEA two sample -tests between 78 myopic and 78 emmetropic glaucoma eyes found that myopic glaucoma eyes demonstrated significant fluctuation for MD (p = 0.006) and VFI (p = 0.035) compared with emmetropic eyes. Although myopic eyes showed greater fluctuation in MD (1.504 ± 1.016) and VFI (0.037 ± 0.045) compared with emmetropic glaucoma eyes (MD = 1.125 ± 0.652) (VFI = 0.026 ± 0.019), threshold sensitivity analyses did not reach statistically significant differences (p = 0.054) between myopic (1.609 ± 1.022) and emmetropic glaucoma eyes (1.339 ± 0.687). One-way ANOVA tests found statistically significant MD and VFI fluctuation difference (MD = -0.29, p value = 0.01) (VFI = -0.30, p value = 0.03) but not threshold sensitivity fluctuation difference = -0.19 (p value = 0.11). Conclusion: The results for MD and VFI, but not threshold sensitivity, are consistent with the hypothesis that myopic patients demonstrate more visual field fluctuation than emmetropic glaucoma patients.

近视眼与屈光性青光眼患者视野波动的比较。
背景:相互矛盾的研究表明,近视可能增加或减少发生青光眼视野丧失的风险。为了提供适当的治疗,必须区分视野波动和真正的视野进展。视野波动发生在数天至数周内,而不是由于病理改变。目的:回顾性观察性临床研究证实近视青光眼患者比正视性青光眼患者表现出更大的长期视野波动。方法:对156只眼进行4次以上汉弗莱视野检查。收集视野指数(VFI)图、平均偏差(MD)和青光眼进展分析的阈值敏感性来量化波动。样本分为两组:(1)准屈光性青光眼,球面等效屈光度在+2 ~ -2屈光度之间;(2)高度近视青光眼,球面等效屈光度≤-5屈光度。采用随机效应的两个样本检验和单因素方差分析(ANOVA)检验,采用近似均方根误差(RMSEA)比较波动。结果:78只近视青光眼和78只准斜视青光眼的RMSEA双样本检验发现,与准斜视相比,近视青光眼的MD (p = 0.006)和VFI (p = 0.035)有显著波动。虽然近视眼的MD(1.504±1.016)和VFI(0.037±0.045)的波动比正视性青光眼(MD = 1.125±0.652)(VFI = 0.026±0.019)更大,但阈值敏感性分析显示,近视眼(1.609±1.022)和正视性青光眼(1.339±0.687)的差异无统计学意义(p = 0.054)。单因素方差分析发现,MD和VFI波动差异有统计学意义(MD = -0.29, p值= 0.01)(VFI = -0.30, p值= 0.03),但阈值敏感性波动差异无统计学意义(p值= 0.11)。结论:MD和VFI的结果与近视患者比正视性青光眼患者表现出更大的视野波动的假设一致,而不是阈值敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ophthalmology
Journal of Ophthalmology MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-OPHTHALMOLOGY
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the anatomy, physiology and diseases of the eye. Submissions should focus on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, as well as clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信