Linking agricultural conservation to water quality outcomes in the United States at multiple scales: Do we have the information we need?

IF 2.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Laura Naslund, Lily Kirk, Jana E Compton, Anne Neale
{"title":"Linking agricultural conservation to water quality outcomes in the United States at multiple scales: Do we have the information we need?","authors":"Laura Naslund, Lily Kirk, Jana E Compton, Anne Neale","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Excess nitrogen and phosphorus export from agricultural lands is a primary contributor to water quality degradation in the United States. To improve water quality, significant investments have been made to implement conservation practices on agricultural lands, including through mandated spending in the Farm Bill and the Inflation Reduction Act. Effectively guiding conservation implementation requires assessment of practice efficacy at regional and national scales, consistent with the scales of water quality goals. To evaluate whether existing resources are sufficient for such conservation efficacy assessments, we review prior efforts and publicly available data and tools to evaluate the effects of agricultural conservation on water quality outcomes. We find that practice records from programs that fund agricultural conservation have a unique and substantial potential for secondary use to generate insights about conservation effects from local to national scales, but modifications would help maximize the potential of these data for assessing conservation efficacy. Such assessments would benefit from improved consistency in reporting units and geographic scales across program datasets; quantification of the duration of water quality benefits from conservation practices; publication of practice data aggregated across programs, to increase the spatial resolution of conservation insights while maintaining legal protections of producer privacy; and collection of water quality and conservation practice data at similar temporal and spatial scales. Enhancing existing and future datasets could deliver high return on effort by generating valuable insights to improve the use of conservation practices for water quality management.</p>","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Excess nitrogen and phosphorus export from agricultural lands is a primary contributor to water quality degradation in the United States. To improve water quality, significant investments have been made to implement conservation practices on agricultural lands, including through mandated spending in the Farm Bill and the Inflation Reduction Act. Effectively guiding conservation implementation requires assessment of practice efficacy at regional and national scales, consistent with the scales of water quality goals. To evaluate whether existing resources are sufficient for such conservation efficacy assessments, we review prior efforts and publicly available data and tools to evaluate the effects of agricultural conservation on water quality outcomes. We find that practice records from programs that fund agricultural conservation have a unique and substantial potential for secondary use to generate insights about conservation effects from local to national scales, but modifications would help maximize the potential of these data for assessing conservation efficacy. Such assessments would benefit from improved consistency in reporting units and geographic scales across program datasets; quantification of the duration of water quality benefits from conservation practices; publication of practice data aggregated across programs, to increase the spatial resolution of conservation insights while maintaining legal protections of producer privacy; and collection of water quality and conservation practice data at similar temporal and spatial scales. Enhancing existing and future datasets could deliver high return on effort by generating valuable insights to improve the use of conservation practices for water quality management.

在多个尺度上将美国的农业保护与水质结果联系起来:我们有我们需要的信息吗?
农业用地过量的氮和磷出口是美国水质退化的主要原因。为了改善水质,在农业用地实施保护措施方面进行了大量投资,包括在《农业法案》和《通货膨胀减少法》中规定了强制性支出。有效地指导保护实施需要在区域和国家尺度上评估实践效果,与水质目标的尺度相一致。为了评估现有资源是否足以进行这种保护效果评估,我们回顾了以前的工作和公开可用的数据和工具,以评估农业保护对水质结果的影响。我们发现,资助农业保护项目的实践记录具有独特而巨大的二次利用潜力,可以产生从地方到国家尺度的保护效果的见解,但修改将有助于最大限度地发挥这些数据在评估保护效果方面的潜力。这种评估将受益于各方案数据集之间报告单位和地理范围的一致性改善;量化保育措施对水质的效益持续时间;发布跨项目汇总的实践数据,以提高保护见解的空间分辨率,同时保持对生产者隐私的法律保护;在相似的时空尺度上收集水质和保护实践数据。加强现有和未来的数据集可以产生有价值的见解,以改善水质管理中保护实践的使用,从而带来高回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of environmental quality
Journal of environmental quality 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring. Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信