Clinical effect of radical debris evacuation with a flexible neuroendoscope on patients with ventriculitis: a case series.

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Takeyoshi Honta, Tomohiro Kawaguchi, Hiroki Uchida, Shunsuke Omodaka, Kuniyasu Niizuma, Hidenori Endo
{"title":"Clinical effect of radical debris evacuation with a flexible neuroendoscope on patients with ventriculitis: a case series.","authors":"Takeyoshi Honta, Tomohiro Kawaguchi, Hiroki Uchida, Shunsuke Omodaka, Kuniyasu Niizuma, Hidenori Endo","doi":"10.1186/s13256-025-05541-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventriculitis is a severe infectious disease affecting the entire ventricular system and is associated with high mortality and morbidity, particularly due to the subsequent development of hydrocephalus. Although most patients are treated with external ventricular drainage or ventricular irrigation, the impact of radical debris evacuation on clinical outcomes has not been well examined.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>This study included 11 Japanese patients with ventriculitis treated at Tohoku University Hospital or Kohnan Hospital between January 2000 and December 2020. Of these, eight were male and three were female, with ages ranging from 24 to 88 years (median: 52 years). The following variables were retrospectively analyzed using a computerized neuroendoscopy patient database: age, sex, etiology of ventriculitis, initial ventriculitis treatment, presence of hydrocephalus, and the duration between the initial surgery and additional treatment for hydrocephalus. Among the 11 patients, 6 were treated with external ventricular drainage, while 5 underwent radical debris evacuation with a neuroendoscope. Cerebrospinal fluid diversion surgery for hydrocephalus was required in five of six (83.3%) patients treated with external ventricular drainage and three of five (60%) patients treated with neuroendoscopic debris evacuation. The time interval between the initial treatment for ventriculitis and shunt surgery was significantly shorter in patients who underwent radical debris evacuation (12.7 ± 6.5 days) than in those treated with external ventricular drainage (72.2 ± 52.5 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neuroendoscopic radical debris evacuation in patients with ventriculitis may shorten the duration between the initial treatment and shunt surgery and potentially reduce the proportion of patients requiring shunt surgery. This effect is likely due to the attenuation of ventricular inflammation, contributing to improved clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Case Reports","volume":"19 1","pages":"461"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-025-05541-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ventriculitis is a severe infectious disease affecting the entire ventricular system and is associated with high mortality and morbidity, particularly due to the subsequent development of hydrocephalus. Although most patients are treated with external ventricular drainage or ventricular irrigation, the impact of radical debris evacuation on clinical outcomes has not been well examined.

Case presentation: This study included 11 Japanese patients with ventriculitis treated at Tohoku University Hospital or Kohnan Hospital between January 2000 and December 2020. Of these, eight were male and three were female, with ages ranging from 24 to 88 years (median: 52 years). The following variables were retrospectively analyzed using a computerized neuroendoscopy patient database: age, sex, etiology of ventriculitis, initial ventriculitis treatment, presence of hydrocephalus, and the duration between the initial surgery and additional treatment for hydrocephalus. Among the 11 patients, 6 were treated with external ventricular drainage, while 5 underwent radical debris evacuation with a neuroendoscope. Cerebrospinal fluid diversion surgery for hydrocephalus was required in five of six (83.3%) patients treated with external ventricular drainage and three of five (60%) patients treated with neuroendoscopic debris evacuation. The time interval between the initial treatment for ventriculitis and shunt surgery was significantly shorter in patients who underwent radical debris evacuation (12.7 ± 6.5 days) than in those treated with external ventricular drainage (72.2 ± 52.5 days).

Conclusion: Neuroendoscopic radical debris evacuation in patients with ventriculitis may shorten the duration between the initial treatment and shunt surgery and potentially reduce the proportion of patients requiring shunt surgery. This effect is likely due to the attenuation of ventricular inflammation, contributing to improved clinical outcomes.

柔性神经内窥镜下根治碎片清除术治疗脑室炎的临床效果:一个病例系列。
背景:脑室炎是一种影响整个脑室系统的严重感染性疾病,具有很高的死亡率和发病率,特别是由于脑积水的后续发展。虽然大多数患者采用脑室外引流或脑室灌洗治疗,但根治性碎片清除对临床结果的影响尚未得到很好的研究。病例介绍:本研究包括2000年1月至2020年12月期间在东北大学医院或Kohnan医院接受治疗的11名日本脑室炎患者。其中,8名男性,3名女性,年龄从24岁到88岁不等(中位数:52岁)。使用计算机化神经内窥镜患者数据库回顾性分析以下变量:年龄、性别、脑室炎的病因、脑室炎的初始治疗、脑积水的存在以及初次手术和脑积水额外治疗之间的持续时间。11例患者中,6例行外脑室引流术,5例行神经内窥镜根治性碎片清除术。6例脑室外引流患者中有5例(83.3%)需要脑脊液分流手术,5例神经内窥镜碎片清除患者中有3例(60%)需要脑脊液分流手术。脑室炎初始治疗与分流手术之间的时间间隔,根治性碎片清除组(12.7±6.5天)明显短于脑室外引流组(72.2±52.5天)。结论:脑室炎患者神经内窥镜根治性碎片清除术可缩短初始治疗到分流术的时间,并有可能降低分流术患者的比例。这种效果可能是由于心室炎症的衰减,有助于改善临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Case Reports
Journal of Medical Case Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
436
期刊介绍: JMCR is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that will consider any original case report that expands the field of general medical knowledge. Reports should show one of the following: 1. Unreported or unusual side effects or adverse interactions involving medications 2. Unexpected or unusual presentations of a disease 3. New associations or variations in disease processes 4. Presentations, diagnoses and/or management of new and emerging diseases 5. An unexpected association between diseases or symptoms 6. An unexpected event in the course of observing or treating a patient 7. Findings that shed new light on the possible pathogenesis of a disease or an adverse effect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信