Impact of starting dose of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on outcomes following combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Hiroki Ishihara, Koichi Nishimura, Yuki Nemoto, Shinsuke Mizoguchi, Takayuki Nakayama, Hironori Fukuda, Hiroaki Shimmura, Yasunobu Hashimoto, Kazuhiko Yoshida, Junpei Iizuka, Tsunenori Kondo, Toshio Takagi
{"title":"Impact of starting dose of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on outcomes following combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma.","authors":"Hiroki Ishihara, Koichi Nishimura, Yuki Nemoto, Shinsuke Mizoguchi, Takayuki Nakayama, Hironori Fukuda, Hiroaki Shimmura, Yasunobu Hashimoto, Kazuhiko Yoshida, Junpei Iizuka, Tsunenori Kondo, Toshio Takagi","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of the starting dose of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) following combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors with TKIs (i.e. IO-TKI) for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated clinical data from 155 patients treated with first-line IO-TKI for RCC. Patients were categorized into full-dose and reduced-dose groups based on their starting dose of TKIs. Effectiveness and safety profiles were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A reduced starting dose was administered to 52 patients (34%). These patients were older (P = 0.0137) and received pembrolizumab plus axitinib more frequently, while lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was less used (P = 0.0258) compared to the full-dose group. Progression-free survival and overall survival did not significantly differ between the full-dose and reduced-dose groups (P = 0.202 and P = 0.309, respectively). Although the objective response rate appeared higher in the full-dose group, the difference was not statistically significant after adjusting for other covariates (P = 0.0588). Safety profiles were comparable, with no significant differences in TKI dose reduction, drug interruption or discontinuation, or glucocorticoids use (P > 0.05). However, adverse events of grade ≥3 were more frequent in the full-dose group, although not statistically significant (P = 0.121).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The starting dose of TKIs did not significantly impact clinical outcomes following IO-TKI for RCC. These findings suggest a potential for the optimization of the starting dose of TKIs; however, prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The impact of the starting dose of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) following combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors with TKIs (i.e. IO-TKI) for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unclear.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated clinical data from 155 patients treated with first-line IO-TKI for RCC. Patients were categorized into full-dose and reduced-dose groups based on their starting dose of TKIs. Effectiveness and safety profiles were compared between groups.

Results: A reduced starting dose was administered to 52 patients (34%). These patients were older (P = 0.0137) and received pembrolizumab plus axitinib more frequently, while lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was less used (P = 0.0258) compared to the full-dose group. Progression-free survival and overall survival did not significantly differ between the full-dose and reduced-dose groups (P = 0.202 and P = 0.309, respectively). Although the objective response rate appeared higher in the full-dose group, the difference was not statistically significant after adjusting for other covariates (P = 0.0588). Safety profiles were comparable, with no significant differences in TKI dose reduction, drug interruption or discontinuation, or glucocorticoids use (P > 0.05). However, adverse events of grade ≥3 were more frequent in the full-dose group, although not statistically significant (P = 0.121).

Conclusion: The starting dose of TKIs did not significantly impact clinical outcomes following IO-TKI for RCC. These findings suggest a potential for the optimization of the starting dose of TKIs; however, prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的起始剂量对免疫检查点抑制剂与酪氨酸激酶抑制剂联合治疗先前未治疗的晚期肾细胞癌的结果的影响
背景:免疫检查点抑制剂联合TKIs(即IO-TKI)治疗晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)后酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)的起始剂量的影响尚不清楚。方法:我们回顾性评价155例接受一线IO-TKI治疗的RCC患者的临床资料。根据TKIs的起始剂量,将患者分为全剂量组和减剂量组。比较两组间的有效性和安全性。结果:52例患者(34%)减少了起始剂量。与全剂量组相比,这些患者年龄较大(P = 0.0137),更频繁地使用派姆单抗加阿西替尼,而lenvatinib加派姆单抗的使用较少(P = 0.0258)。全剂量组和减剂量组的无进展生存期和总生存期无显著差异(P = 0.202和P = 0.309)。虽然全剂量组客观有效率更高,但校正其他协变量后差异无统计学意义(P = 0.0588)。安全性方面具有可比性,TKI剂量减少、药物中断或停药或糖皮质激素使用方面无显著差异(P < 0.05)。而全剂量组≥3级不良事件发生率更高,但无统计学意义(P = 0.121)。结论:TKIs的起始剂量对RCC IO-TKI后的临床结果没有显著影响。这些发现表明TKIs的起始剂量有优化的潜力;然而,有必要进行前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for clinical oncologists which strives to publish high quality manuscripts addressing medical oncology, clinical trials, radiology, surgery, basic research, and palliative care. The journal aims to contribute to the world"s scientific community with special attention to the area of clinical oncology and the Asian region. JJCO publishes various articles types including: ・Original Articles ・Case Reports ・Clinical Trial Notes ・Cancer Genetics Reports ・Epidemiology Notes ・Technical Notes ・Short Communications ・Letters to the Editors ・Solicited Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信