Laura Wilson, Coby Martin, Sandeep Tripathi, Harshit Dixit, Jared Miller, Ruihong Wang, Won Chan Lee
{"title":"A budget impact analysis of the Dario Diabetes Solution for type 2 diabetes mellitus in a US managed care population.","authors":"Laura Wilson, Coby Martin, Sandeep Tripathi, Harshit Dixit, Jared Miller, Ruihong Wang, Won Chan Lee","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2564575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To estimate the potential budget impact following adoption of the Dario Diabetes Solution (DDS), a combined all-in-one smart glucose monitor with cloud-based app integration, in combination with standard of care (SoC) for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) versus SoC alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Applying the findings of the retrospective cohort from real world data (RWD) studies of T2D patients' clinical outcomes and healthcare r251esource utilization (HCRU), a population-based budget impact model was developed. Budget impact was estimated with disaggregated costs calculated in categories, including medication, inpatient (IP) and emergency room (ER), office visit, and all-cause total costs. One-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA) was conducted to quantify the uncertainty in the model input parameters. Eight unique scenarios were analyzed, including the Medicare perspective, a two-year time horizon, and glycemic control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of the base case (1-year, commercial perspective, inclusion of device, application, and costs pertaining to consumable, medication, and health care resource utilization) resulted in net cost savings of $9,652,498 in a plan population of 1 million. Net budget impact for scenarios ranged from savings of $39,216,721, for the Medicare-only perspective instead of commercial, to $251,554 when restricting the population to patients who moved from poor-to-good glycemic control (HbA1C ≥ 8% mg/dl to < 8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite cost estimation using remittance data and a relatively short time horizon (one year), our budget impact analysis demonstrated substantial cost savings with the introduction of DDS, driven by reduced HCRU for patients using DDS, who displayed improved adherence and glycemic control.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1721-1732"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2564575","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: To estimate the potential budget impact following adoption of the Dario Diabetes Solution (DDS), a combined all-in-one smart glucose monitor with cloud-based app integration, in combination with standard of care (SoC) for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) versus SoC alone.
Methods: Applying the findings of the retrospective cohort from real world data (RWD) studies of T2D patients' clinical outcomes and healthcare r251esource utilization (HCRU), a population-based budget impact model was developed. Budget impact was estimated with disaggregated costs calculated in categories, including medication, inpatient (IP) and emergency room (ER), office visit, and all-cause total costs. One-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA) was conducted to quantify the uncertainty in the model input parameters. Eight unique scenarios were analyzed, including the Medicare perspective, a two-year time horizon, and glycemic control.
Results: Analysis of the base case (1-year, commercial perspective, inclusion of device, application, and costs pertaining to consumable, medication, and health care resource utilization) resulted in net cost savings of $9,652,498 in a plan population of 1 million. Net budget impact for scenarios ranged from savings of $39,216,721, for the Medicare-only perspective instead of commercial, to $251,554 when restricting the population to patients who moved from poor-to-good glycemic control (HbA1C ≥ 8% mg/dl to < 8%).
Conclusions: Despite cost estimation using remittance data and a relatively short time horizon (one year), our budget impact analysis demonstrated substantial cost savings with the introduction of DDS, driven by reduced HCRU for patients using DDS, who displayed improved adherence and glycemic control.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication.
Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience