A budget impact analysis of the Dario Diabetes Solution for type 2 diabetes mellitus in a US managed care population.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-06 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2025.2564575
Laura Wilson, Coby Martin, Sandeep Tripathi, Harshit Dixit, Jared Miller, Ruihong Wang, Won Chan Lee
{"title":"A budget impact analysis of the Dario Diabetes Solution for type 2 diabetes mellitus in a US managed care population.","authors":"Laura Wilson, Coby Martin, Sandeep Tripathi, Harshit Dixit, Jared Miller, Ruihong Wang, Won Chan Lee","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2564575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To estimate the potential budget impact following adoption of the Dario Diabetes Solution (DDS), a combined all-in-one smart glucose monitor with cloud-based app integration, in combination with standard of care (SoC) for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) versus SoC alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Applying the findings of the retrospective cohort from real world data (RWD) studies of T2D patients' clinical outcomes and healthcare r251esource utilization (HCRU), a population-based budget impact model was developed. Budget impact was estimated with disaggregated costs calculated in categories, including medication, inpatient (IP) and emergency room (ER), office visit, and all-cause total costs. One-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA) was conducted to quantify the uncertainty in the model input parameters. Eight unique scenarios were analyzed, including the Medicare perspective, a two-year time horizon, and glycemic control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of the base case (1-year, commercial perspective, inclusion of device, application, and costs pertaining to consumable, medication, and health care resource utilization) resulted in net cost savings of $9,652,498 in a plan population of 1 million. Net budget impact for scenarios ranged from savings of $39,216,721, for the Medicare-only perspective instead of commercial, to $251,554 when restricting the population to patients who moved from poor-to-good glycemic control (HbA1C ≥ 8% mg/dl to < 8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite cost estimation using remittance data and a relatively short time horizon (one year), our budget impact analysis demonstrated substantial cost savings with the introduction of DDS, driven by reduced HCRU for patients using DDS, who displayed improved adherence and glycemic control.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1721-1732"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2564575","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To estimate the potential budget impact following adoption of the Dario Diabetes Solution (DDS), a combined all-in-one smart glucose monitor with cloud-based app integration, in combination with standard of care (SoC) for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) versus SoC alone.

Methods: Applying the findings of the retrospective cohort from real world data (RWD) studies of T2D patients' clinical outcomes and healthcare r251esource utilization (HCRU), a population-based budget impact model was developed. Budget impact was estimated with disaggregated costs calculated in categories, including medication, inpatient (IP) and emergency room (ER), office visit, and all-cause total costs. One-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA) was conducted to quantify the uncertainty in the model input parameters. Eight unique scenarios were analyzed, including the Medicare perspective, a two-year time horizon, and glycemic control.

Results: Analysis of the base case (1-year, commercial perspective, inclusion of device, application, and costs pertaining to consumable, medication, and health care resource utilization) resulted in net cost savings of $9,652,498 in a plan population of 1 million. Net budget impact for scenarios ranged from savings of $39,216,721, for the Medicare-only perspective instead of commercial, to $251,554 when restricting the population to patients who moved from poor-to-good glycemic control (HbA1C ≥ 8% mg/dl to < 8%).

Conclusions: Despite cost estimation using remittance data and a relatively short time horizon (one year), our budget impact analysis demonstrated substantial cost savings with the introduction of DDS, driven by reduced HCRU for patients using DDS, who displayed improved adherence and glycemic control.

dario糖尿病解决方案在美国管理护理人群中治疗2型糖尿病的预算影响分析
目的:评估采用Dario糖尿病解决方案(DDS)后的潜在预算影响,DDS是一种基于云应用程序集成的一体化智能血糖监测仪,与2型糖尿病(T2D)患者的标准护理(SoC)相结合,而不是单独使用SoC。方法:根据T2D患者临床结局和医疗资源利用(HCRU)的真实世界数据(RWD)回顾性队列研究结果,建立基于人群的预算影响模型。预算影响是通过分类计算的分类成本来估计的,包括药物、住院(IP)和急诊室(ER)、办公室就诊和全因总成本。采用单向灵敏度分析(OWSA)对模型输入参数的不确定性进行量化。研究分析了八种独特的情况,包括医疗保险的观点、两年的时间范围和血糖控制。结果:对基本案例(1年,商业角度,包括设备、应用程序和与消耗品、药物和卫生保健资源利用有关的成本)的分析导致在100万计划人口中净成本节省9,652,498美元。方案的净预算影响范围从仅从医疗保险角度而非商业角度来看,节省39,216,721美元,到将人群限制在血糖控制从差到好的患者(HbA1C≥8% mg/dl至< 8%)时,节省251,554美元。结论:尽管使用汇款数据和相对较短的时间范围(一年)进行成本估算,但我们的预算影响分析表明,由于使用DDS的患者HCRU降低,依从性和血糖控制得到改善,引入DDS可以节省大量成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信