Treatment preferences by infectious diseases clinicians for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Samuel E Cincotta, Belinda E Ostrowsky, Jessica Howard-Anderson, Susan E Beekmann, Philip M Polgreen, Maroya S Walters
{"title":"Treatment preferences by infectious diseases clinicians for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections.","authors":"Samuel E Cincotta, Belinda E Ostrowsky, Jessica Howard-Anderson, Susan E Beekmann, Philip M Polgreen, Maroya S Walters","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>New antibiotics effective against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) provide additional treatment options, but data on clinician decision-making are limited. We sought to understand treatment preferences, factors influencing antibiotic selection for CRE infections and barriers to prescribing newer agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed infectious disease clinicians through the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Emerging Infections Network (EIN) about their experience treating CRE infections, availability of resistance mechanism testing, antibiotic choices in four CRE infection scenarios and barriers to using newer antibiotics. We used the 2023 IDSA Guidance on the Treatment of Antimicrobial Resistant Gram-Negative Infections to classify antibiotic selections for the scenario-based questions as preferred approach, alternative option or not in guidance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 441 EIN members responded. Among these, 337 (76%) reported treating a CRE infection in the last year. For the clinical scenarios, 851 (63%) of 1356 selections were IDSA-preferred approaches; of these, 653 (77%) were for ceftazidime-avibactam, either alone (n = 456) or in combination with aztreonam (n = 197), more than for other β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination agents active against CRE. For an uncomplicated urinary tract infection caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, where no preferred approaches were available, the most common antibiotic selected was oral fosfomycin (169/343 (49%)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most clinicians selected antibiotics aligned with the IDSA guidance for serious CRE infections, although the frequent selection of an agent not in the guidance for uncomplicated cystitis suggests that treatment selection is complex and may depend on infection severity, among other factors. The preference for ceftazidime-avibactam among similar agents is notable and may reflect its longer market availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf371","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: New antibiotics effective against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) provide additional treatment options, but data on clinician decision-making are limited. We sought to understand treatment preferences, factors influencing antibiotic selection for CRE infections and barriers to prescribing newer agents.

Methods: We surveyed infectious disease clinicians through the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Emerging Infections Network (EIN) about their experience treating CRE infections, availability of resistance mechanism testing, antibiotic choices in four CRE infection scenarios and barriers to using newer antibiotics. We used the 2023 IDSA Guidance on the Treatment of Antimicrobial Resistant Gram-Negative Infections to classify antibiotic selections for the scenario-based questions as preferred approach, alternative option or not in guidance.

Results: Overall, 441 EIN members responded. Among these, 337 (76%) reported treating a CRE infection in the last year. For the clinical scenarios, 851 (63%) of 1356 selections were IDSA-preferred approaches; of these, 653 (77%) were for ceftazidime-avibactam, either alone (n = 456) or in combination with aztreonam (n = 197), more than for other β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination agents active against CRE. For an uncomplicated urinary tract infection caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, where no preferred approaches were available, the most common antibiotic selected was oral fosfomycin (169/343 (49%)).

Conclusions: Most clinicians selected antibiotics aligned with the IDSA guidance for serious CRE infections, although the frequent selection of an agent not in the guidance for uncomplicated cystitis suggests that treatment selection is complex and may depend on infection severity, among other factors. The preference for ceftazidime-avibactam among similar agents is notable and may reflect its longer market availability.

传染性疾病临床医生对耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌感染的治疗偏好。
背景和目的:对碳青霉烯耐药肠杆菌(CRE)有效的新抗生素提供了额外的治疗选择,但临床医生决策的数据有限。我们试图了解CRE感染的治疗偏好、影响抗生素选择的因素以及开新药的障碍。方法:通过美国传染病学会(IDSA)新发感染网络(EIN)对传染病临床医生进行调查,了解他们治疗CRE感染的经验、耐药机制检测的可得性、四种CRE感染情况下的抗生素选择以及使用新抗生素的障碍。我们使用2023年IDSA耐药革兰氏阴性感染治疗指南,将基于场景的问题的抗生素选择分为首选方法、替代选择或不作为指导。结果:总共有441名EIN成员做出了回应。其中,337人(76%)报告在去年治疗了CRE感染。对于临床情况,1356个选择中有851个(63%)是idsa首选方法;其中,653例(77%)使用头孢他啶-阿维巴坦,单独使用(n = 456)或与阿曲南联合使用(n = 197),多于其他抗CRE的β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂联用药物。对于碳青霉烯耐药肺炎克雷伯菌引起的无并发症尿路感染,在没有首选方法的情况下,选择的最常见抗生素是口服磷霉素(169/343(49%))。结论:对于严重CRE感染,大多数临床医生选择符合IDSA指南的抗生素,尽管经常选择未在非复杂性膀胱炎指南中的药物表明治疗选择是复杂的,可能取决于感染严重程度和其他因素。在同类药物中,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的偏好值得注意,这可能反映了其更长的市场可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信