American Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (AABIP) Evidence-Based Guidelines on Bronchoscopic Diagnosis and Staging of Lung Cancer.

IF 3.2 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Russell J Miller, Ara A Chrissian, Fayez Kheir, Majid Shafiq, Abigail T Chua, Neal Navani, Francisco A Almeida, Abdul H Alraiyes, Paul A Bain, Christina R Bellinger, Cherng H Chao, George Z Cheng, Rebecca Cloyes, Javier Diaz-Mendoza, David M DiBardino, Erik Folch, Laura K Frye, Yaron B Gesthalter, Thomas R Gildea, Amit Goyal, Karen M Heskett, Van Kim Holden, Moishe Liberman, Christopher Manley, Nikhil K Meena, Catherine L Oberg, Jasleen K Pannu, Edward M Pickering, Michal Senitko, Jo-Anne O Shepard, Thomas Vandemoortele, Atul C Mehta, Kazuhiro Yasufuku
{"title":"American Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (AABIP) Evidence-Based Guidelines on Bronchoscopic Diagnosis and Staging of Lung Cancer.","authors":"Russell J Miller, Ara A Chrissian, Fayez Kheir, Majid Shafiq, Abigail T Chua, Neal Navani, Francisco A Almeida, Abdul H Alraiyes, Paul A Bain, Christina R Bellinger, Cherng H Chao, George Z Cheng, Rebecca Cloyes, Javier Diaz-Mendoza, David M DiBardino, Erik Folch, Laura K Frye, Yaron B Gesthalter, Thomas R Gildea, Amit Goyal, Karen M Heskett, Van Kim Holden, Moishe Liberman, Christopher Manley, Nikhil K Meena, Catherine L Oberg, Jasleen K Pannu, Edward M Pickering, Michal Senitko, Jo-Anne O Shepard, Thomas Vandemoortele, Atul C Mehta, Kazuhiro Yasufuku","doi":"10.1097/LBR.0000000000001034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer remains a predominant cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and there are notable geographic and institutional differences in both diagnostic and staging approaches. To address this, the American Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (AABIP) convened a multidisciplinary committee to craft evidence-based and evidence-informed recommendations for diagnosing peripheral pulmonary nodules and performing convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS)-guided mediastinal staging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi method guided the creation and refinement of 9 Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) questions. A systematic literature review, updated through March 2023, served as the basis for drafting recommendations. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the quality of evidence and relied on National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) language to express the strength of each recommendation. Where suitable, meta-analyses were completed; otherwise, systematic reviews and consensus among experts provided the evidence for guidance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine recommendations were ultimately proposed: 6 were supported by meta-analyses and 3 by systematic reviews. The topics include comparing diagnostic yield and complication rates between peripheral bronchoscopy and transthoracic needle biopsy, the use of multiple biopsy instruments and the role of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) during peripheral bronchoscopy, and best practices for CP-EBUS-guided mediastinal staging. Several critical considerations emerged, such as lesion size, evolving technologies in bronchoscopy, and the importance of both available resources and local expertise.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These guidelines aim to standardize and streamline recommendations for the bronchoscopic diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. Since rapid technological progress and observational data play significant roles in this field, ongoing research and evidence updates will be vital to refining best practices. Clinicians are advised to tailor these recommendations according to local circumstances, the unique needs of their patients, and any new findings as they develop.</p>","PeriodicalId":15268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000001034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer remains a predominant cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and there are notable geographic and institutional differences in both diagnostic and staging approaches. To address this, the American Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (AABIP) convened a multidisciplinary committee to craft evidence-based and evidence-informed recommendations for diagnosing peripheral pulmonary nodules and performing convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS)-guided mediastinal staging.

Methods: A modified Delphi method guided the creation and refinement of 9 Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) questions. A systematic literature review, updated through March 2023, served as the basis for drafting recommendations. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the quality of evidence and relied on National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) language to express the strength of each recommendation. Where suitable, meta-analyses were completed; otherwise, systematic reviews and consensus among experts provided the evidence for guidance.

Results: Nine recommendations were ultimately proposed: 6 were supported by meta-analyses and 3 by systematic reviews. The topics include comparing diagnostic yield and complication rates between peripheral bronchoscopy and transthoracic needle biopsy, the use of multiple biopsy instruments and the role of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) during peripheral bronchoscopy, and best practices for CP-EBUS-guided mediastinal staging. Several critical considerations emerged, such as lesion size, evolving technologies in bronchoscopy, and the importance of both available resources and local expertise.

Conclusion: These guidelines aim to standardize and streamline recommendations for the bronchoscopic diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. Since rapid technological progress and observational data play significant roles in this field, ongoing research and evidence updates will be vital to refining best practices. Clinicians are advised to tailor these recommendations according to local circumstances, the unique needs of their patients, and any new findings as they develop.

美国支气管学和介入肺病学会(AABIP)基于证据的支气管镜诊断和肺癌分期指南。
背景:肺癌仍然是世界范围内癌症相关死亡的主要原因,在诊断和分期方法上存在显著的地理和制度差异。为了解决这个问题,美国支气管学和介入肺病学协会(AABIP)召集了一个多学科委员会,以循证和循证为依据,制定诊断周围性肺结节和进行凸探头支气管超声(CP-EBUS)引导的纵隔分期的建议。方法:采用改进的德尔菲法对9个人口、干预、比较物、结果(PICO)问题进行设计和优化。到2023年3月,一项系统的文献综述作为起草建议的基础。该小组使用建议、评估、发展和评估分级(GRADE)方法来评估证据的质量,并依靠国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)的语言来表达每项建议的强度。在合适的情况下,完成meta分析;除此之外,系统评价和专家之间的共识为指导提供了证据。结果:最终提出了9项建议:6项由荟萃分析支持,3项由系统评价支持。主题包括比较外周支气管镜检查和经胸穿刺活检的诊断率和并发症发生率,多种活检仪器的使用和外周支气管镜检查中快速现场评估(ROSE)的作用,以及cp - ebus引导的纵隔分期的最佳实践。出现了几个关键的考虑因素,如病变大小,支气管镜检查技术的发展,以及可用资源和当地专业知识的重要性。结论:本指南旨在规范和简化支气管镜下肺癌的诊断和分期建议。由于快速的技术进步和观测数据在这一领域发挥着重要作用,因此正在进行的研究和证据更新对于完善最佳做法至关重要。建议临床医生根据当地情况、患者的独特需求以及任何新发现来调整这些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
121
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信