Oihane Del Puerto, Sidney Behringer, Kristin Höfer, Marta Baccaro, Neil Sherborne, Nico van den Brink, Roman Ashauer
{"title":"Evaluating the impact of experimental duration on toxicokinetic parameters and bioaccumulation factors in earthworm (Eisenia fetida) studies.","authors":"Oihane Del Puerto, Sidney Behringer, Kristin Höfer, Marta Baccaro, Neil Sherborne, Nico van den Brink, Roman Ashauer","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Earthworms contribute to soil health and nutrient cycling and serve as a crucial food source for higher trophic organisms. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 317 bioaccumulation test investigates the potential for chemicals to bioaccumulate in earthworms, where a kinetic bioaccumulation factor (BAF) is calculated as the ratio between the uptake and elimination rate constants, assuming first-order kinetics. This implies that steady state conditions are not necessary, suggesting independence of experimental durations. If valid, the kinetic BAF could be estimated within a shorter timeframe than recommended by the 6-week OECD guideline. However, there is limited data to validate this. This study aimed to determine whether toxicokinetic (TK) rate constants and BAF depend on experimental duration. Individual Eisenia fetida were exposed to three organic compounds in two parallel experiments labeled \"short\" and \"long.\" The short experiment involved a 7-day exposure and 14-day elimination phase, and the long experiment entailed a 21-day exposure and 14-day elimination phase. A one-compartment TK model estimated uptake and elimination rate constants from exposure to bulk soil and water extractable fraction, from which kinetic BAFs were derived. Our findings indicated fast kinetics for all compounds. Importantly, in five out of six cases, kinetic rate constants from the short experiments fell within the confidence intervals of those from the long experiment, suggesting comparable results. Three of the six kinetic BAF values in the short treatment were within the 95% confidence interval of the long treatment. In conclusion, a 3-week bioaccumulation study can predict the outcome of a 5-week study. However, additional studies are needed before recommendations can be made regarding the applicability of shorter experimental approaches for earthworm bioaccumulation studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":"44 10","pages":"2900-2910"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf154","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Earthworms contribute to soil health and nutrient cycling and serve as a crucial food source for higher trophic organisms. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 317 bioaccumulation test investigates the potential for chemicals to bioaccumulate in earthworms, where a kinetic bioaccumulation factor (BAF) is calculated as the ratio between the uptake and elimination rate constants, assuming first-order kinetics. This implies that steady state conditions are not necessary, suggesting independence of experimental durations. If valid, the kinetic BAF could be estimated within a shorter timeframe than recommended by the 6-week OECD guideline. However, there is limited data to validate this. This study aimed to determine whether toxicokinetic (TK) rate constants and BAF depend on experimental duration. Individual Eisenia fetida were exposed to three organic compounds in two parallel experiments labeled "short" and "long." The short experiment involved a 7-day exposure and 14-day elimination phase, and the long experiment entailed a 21-day exposure and 14-day elimination phase. A one-compartment TK model estimated uptake and elimination rate constants from exposure to bulk soil and water extractable fraction, from which kinetic BAFs were derived. Our findings indicated fast kinetics for all compounds. Importantly, in five out of six cases, kinetic rate constants from the short experiments fell within the confidence intervals of those from the long experiment, suggesting comparable results. Three of the six kinetic BAF values in the short treatment were within the 95% confidence interval of the long treatment. In conclusion, a 3-week bioaccumulation study can predict the outcome of a 5-week study. However, additional studies are needed before recommendations can be made regarding the applicability of shorter experimental approaches for earthworm bioaccumulation studies.
期刊介绍:
The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...]
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.