Faecal microbiota transplantation for urinary tract infections.

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Paulína Belvončíková, Roman Gardlík
{"title":"Faecal microbiota transplantation for urinary tract infections.","authors":"Paulína Belvončíková, Roman Gardlík","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.09.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) are a major clinical burden, increasingly complicated by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) and antibiotic overuse. Growing evidence implicates gut microbiota dysbiosis as a key contributor to UTI susceptibility, with the gastrointestinal tract acting as a reservoir for uropathogens.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review examines the emerging role of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as a therapeutic strategy for rUTIs. We synthesize findings from human studies and case reports, evaluate microbiological and clinical outcomes post-FMT, and discuss mechanistic insights, safety concerns, and future research directions.</p><p><strong>Sources: </strong>We reviewed peer-reviewed publications up to May 2025 using PubMed and Web of Science. Included sources comprised clinical trials, cohort studies, case reports, economic analyses, and expert reviews concerning FMT and UTIs.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>FMT has shown promise in reducing rUTI episodes, particularly in patients with underlying gut dysbiosis or MDRO colonization. Clinical studies and case reports consistently report decreased UTI frequency, lower MDRO burden, and increased gut microbiota diversity post-FMT. Patients previously refractory to antibiotic prophylaxis achieved prolonged infection-free periods. Microbiome analyses often reveal reductions in uropathogen abundance and shifts toward donor-like microbial communities. However, outcomes vary and some patients experience persistence or transmission of uropathogens from donor stool, underscoring safety and screening concerns.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>FMT represents a promising microbiome-based intervention for managing rUTIs, particularly in complex or antibiotic-resistant cases. Randomized controlled trials are needed to assess efficacy, define optimal protocols, and address safety concerns. Standardized practices will be essential to integrate FMT into routine UTI care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.09.018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) are a major clinical burden, increasingly complicated by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) and antibiotic overuse. Growing evidence implicates gut microbiota dysbiosis as a key contributor to UTI susceptibility, with the gastrointestinal tract acting as a reservoir for uropathogens.

Objectives: This review examines the emerging role of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as a therapeutic strategy for rUTIs. We synthesize findings from human studies and case reports, evaluate microbiological and clinical outcomes post-FMT, and discuss mechanistic insights, safety concerns, and future research directions.

Sources: We reviewed peer-reviewed publications up to May 2025 using PubMed and Web of Science. Included sources comprised clinical trials, cohort studies, case reports, economic analyses, and expert reviews concerning FMT and UTIs.

Content: FMT has shown promise in reducing rUTI episodes, particularly in patients with underlying gut dysbiosis or MDRO colonization. Clinical studies and case reports consistently report decreased UTI frequency, lower MDRO burden, and increased gut microbiota diversity post-FMT. Patients previously refractory to antibiotic prophylaxis achieved prolonged infection-free periods. Microbiome analyses often reveal reductions in uropathogen abundance and shifts toward donor-like microbial communities. However, outcomes vary and some patients experience persistence or transmission of uropathogens from donor stool, underscoring safety and screening concerns.

Implications: FMT represents a promising microbiome-based intervention for managing rUTIs, particularly in complex or antibiotic-resistant cases. Randomized controlled trials are needed to assess efficacy, define optimal protocols, and address safety concerns. Standardized practices will be essential to integrate FMT into routine UTI care.

粪便菌群移植治疗尿路感染。
背景:复发性尿路感染(rUTIs)是一个主要的临床负担,越来越复杂的多药耐药菌(mdro)和抗生素的过度使用。越来越多的证据表明,肠道菌群失调是尿路感染易感性的关键因素,胃肠道是尿路病原体的储存库。目的:本综述探讨了粪便微生物群移植(FMT)作为rUTIs治疗策略的新作用。我们综合了人类研究和病例报告的发现,评估了fmt后的微生物学和临床结果,并讨论了机制见解,安全性问题和未来的研究方向。资料来源:我们通过PubMed和Web of Science查阅了截至2025年5月的同行评审出版物。纳入的资料来源包括临床试验、队列研究、病例报告、经济分析和有关FMT和uti的专家评论。内容:FMT已显示出减少rUTI发作的希望,特别是在潜在肠道生态失调或MDRO定植的患者中。临床研究和病例报告一致报告fmt后UTI频率降低,MDRO负担降低,肠道微生物群多样性增加。以前对抗生素预防难以耐受的患者获得了较长的无感染期。微生物组分析经常显示尿路病原体丰度的减少和向供体样微生物群落的转移。然而,结果各不相同,一些患者持续存在或从供体粪便中传播尿路病原体,强调安全性和筛查问题。意义:FMT代表了一种很有前途的基于微生物组的干预措施,用于管理ruti,特别是在复杂或抗生素耐药的病例中。需要随机对照试验来评估疗效,确定最佳方案,并解决安全问题。标准化做法对于将FMT纳入常规尿路感染护理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信