Predicting lesion reversal in acute cerebral ischaemia via apparent diffusion coefficient threshold on diffusion-weighted MRI.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Thor Håkon Skattør, Atle Bjørnerud, Terje Nome, Kine Mari Bakke, Brian Anthony Enriquez, Ingrid Digernes, Cecilie Mørck Offersen, Mona Kristiansen Beyer, Geir Ringstad, Anne Hege Aamodt
{"title":"Predicting lesion reversal in acute cerebral ischaemia via apparent diffusion coefficient threshold on diffusion-weighted MRI.","authors":"Thor Håkon Skattør, Atle Bjørnerud, Terje Nome, Kine Mari Bakke, Brian Anthony Enriquez, Ingrid Digernes, Cecilie Mørck Offersen, Mona Kristiansen Beyer, Geir Ringstad, Anne Hege Aamodt","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-12014-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) quickly detects early ischaemic changes, but does not necessarily signify irreversible tissue damage, as DWI lesion reversal (DWI-R) can occur. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) thresholds have been proposed to distinguish salvageable from irreversibly damaged tissue. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of a single ADC threshold for DWI-R following rapid and successful recanalization with voxel-level methodology.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this cohort study, we retrospectively analysed consecutive patients examined with DWI before and the day after endovascular therapy, with successful recanalization within 120 min of baseline MRI. DWI-R was assessed voxel-wise for ADC values between 200 mm<sup>2</sup>/s and 760 × 10<sup>-6</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s. Predictive accuracy of ADC thresholds was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one patients with a mean baseline DWI lesion volume of 18.13 mL (IQR: 6.15, 26.25) were included. Median time from MRI to recanalization was 84.0 min (IQR: 72.0, 95.5). On average, 37.5% of voxels demonstrated reversal. The area under the curve for predicting reversal based on ADC was 0.708, and the optimal threshold was 555 × 10<sup>-6</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s (sensitivity 73.8%, specificity 58.6%). The voxel-wise probability of reversal declined with lower ADC, but even low ADC values exhibited some degree of reversal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reinforces existing concerns about using fixed ADC thresholds to define irreversible injury. A single ADC cut-off showed only modest sensitivity and poor specificity for predicting DWI-R. No definitive lower ADC boundary was identified across clinically relevant ranges below which the likelihood of DWI-R became negligible.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Identifying penumbra from permanent ischaemic damage remains challenging, and the role of ADC evaluation before thrombectomy in predicting tissue viability is debated. Findings An ADC threshold of 555 × 10-6 mm²/s yielded moderate sensitivity (73.8%) and low specificity (58.6%) for predicting DWI-R (AUC 0.708). Clinical relevance A uniform ADC threshold has limited utility in identifying salvageable brain tissue in thrombectomy triage. Our findings emphasise the need for caution when excluding acute ischaemic stroke patients from recanalization therapy based on restrictive diffusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-12014-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) quickly detects early ischaemic changes, but does not necessarily signify irreversible tissue damage, as DWI lesion reversal (DWI-R) can occur. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) thresholds have been proposed to distinguish salvageable from irreversibly damaged tissue. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of a single ADC threshold for DWI-R following rapid and successful recanalization with voxel-level methodology.

Materials and methods: In this cohort study, we retrospectively analysed consecutive patients examined with DWI before and the day after endovascular therapy, with successful recanalization within 120 min of baseline MRI. DWI-R was assessed voxel-wise for ADC values between 200 mm2/s and 760 × 10-6 mm2/s. Predictive accuracy of ADC thresholds was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses.

Results: Seventy-one patients with a mean baseline DWI lesion volume of 18.13 mL (IQR: 6.15, 26.25) were included. Median time from MRI to recanalization was 84.0 min (IQR: 72.0, 95.5). On average, 37.5% of voxels demonstrated reversal. The area under the curve for predicting reversal based on ADC was 0.708, and the optimal threshold was 555 × 10-6 mm2/s (sensitivity 73.8%, specificity 58.6%). The voxel-wise probability of reversal declined with lower ADC, but even low ADC values exhibited some degree of reversal.

Conclusion: This study reinforces existing concerns about using fixed ADC thresholds to define irreversible injury. A single ADC cut-off showed only modest sensitivity and poor specificity for predicting DWI-R. No definitive lower ADC boundary was identified across clinically relevant ranges below which the likelihood of DWI-R became negligible.

Key points: Question Identifying penumbra from permanent ischaemic damage remains challenging, and the role of ADC evaluation before thrombectomy in predicting tissue viability is debated. Findings An ADC threshold of 555 × 10-6 mm²/s yielded moderate sensitivity (73.8%) and low specificity (58.6%) for predicting DWI-R (AUC 0.708). Clinical relevance A uniform ADC threshold has limited utility in identifying salvageable brain tissue in thrombectomy triage. Our findings emphasise the need for caution when excluding acute ischaemic stroke patients from recanalization therapy based on restrictive diffusion.

弥散加权MRI弥散系数阈值预测急性脑缺血病变逆转。
目的:弥散加权成像(DWI)快速检测早期缺血改变,但并不一定意味着不可逆的组织损伤,因为DWI病变逆转(DWI- r)可能发生。表观扩散系数(ADC)阈值被提出用于区分可修复组织和不可逆损伤组织。本研究旨在评估单个ADC阈值对DWI-R的预测价值,该阈值采用体素级方法进行快速成功的再通化。材料和方法:在这项队列研究中,我们回顾性分析了连续患者在血管内治疗前后进行DWI检查,并在基线MRI后120分钟内成功再通。DWI-R按体素评估ADC值在200 mm2/s和760 × 10-6 mm2/s之间。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估ADC阈值的预测准确性。结果:71例DWI病灶平均基线体积为18.13 mL (IQR: 6.15, 26.25)。从MRI到再通的中位时间为84.0 min (IQR: 72.0, 95.5)。平均有37.5%的体素出现反转。ADC预测逆转的曲线下面积为0.708,最佳阈值为555 × 10-6 mm2/s(敏感性73.8%,特异性58.6%)。随着ADC的降低,反转的体素概率下降,但即使低ADC值也表现出一定程度的反转。结论:本研究加强了使用固定ADC阈值来定义不可逆损伤的现有担忧。单一ADC截止值预测DWI-R的敏感性和特异性不高。在临床相关范围内,没有确定明确的ADC下限,低于该范围,DWI-R的可能性可以忽略不计。从永久性缺血损伤中识别半暗带仍然具有挑战性,取栓前ADC评估在预测组织活力方面的作用也存在争议。ADC阈值为555 × 10-6 mm²/s,预测DWI-R的灵敏度为中等(73.8%),特异性为低(58.6%)(AUC为0.708)。在取栓分诊中,统一的ADC阈值在确定可抢救脑组织方面的作用有限。我们的研究结果强调,在基于限制性弥散的再通治疗中排除急性缺血性卒中患者时需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信