Quality control of ultrasound at 11 to 14 weeks of gestation: results from the China Early Pregnancy Ultrasound Cohort.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Jingjing Wang, Wenjia Lei, Yantong Zhu, Na Zhang, Shijing Song, Li Wang, Qingqing Wu
{"title":"Quality control of ultrasound at 11 to 14 weeks of gestation: results from the China Early Pregnancy Ultrasound Cohort.","authors":"Jingjing Wang, Wenjia Lei, Yantong Zhu, Na Zhang, Shijing Song, Li Wang, Qingqing Wu","doi":"10.1186/s40001-025-03156-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the quality control (QC) of ultrasound scanning at 11-14 weeks of gestation during the first stage in the China Early Pregnancy Ultrasound Cohort (CEPUC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A stratified random sampling strategy was employed for QC on ultrasound images from 525 single fetuses between 11 and 13 <sup>+6</sup> weeks of gestation across nine hospitals. The QC process consisted of two elements: (1) the retention of 17 types of ultrasound scans and (2) the assessment of each scan's content, which was scored out of 47 points. QC was performed twice: initially through hospital self-assessment (self-QC) and a subsequent review by the cohort team (second QC). The QC scores were calculated and compared across different groups using the Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median number of retained ultrasound scans per person was 16.0 (interquartile range: 15.0-17.0). The median scores for self-QC and second QC were 44 points (interquartile range: 40-47) and 43 points (interquartile range: 38-46), respectively. The second QC scores were significantly lower than the self-QC scores (P < 0.001), with 225 cases (42.9%) scoring lower and 280 cases (53.3%) scoring equally. Excluding image magnification, the three items with the lowest scoring rates among the other 37 were: (1) coronal view of the cervical spine to the sacrum (62.3%), (2) assessing regurgitation in the tricuspid valve spectrum of the heart (63.4%), and (3) obtaining a three-dimensional (3D) image of the choroid plexus Sect. (78.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>QC in ultrasound is crucial for multicenter cohort studies, ensuring consistency and reliability across various sites. Both subjective and objective measurements should be seriously considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":11949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"891"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-03156-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the quality control (QC) of ultrasound scanning at 11-14 weeks of gestation during the first stage in the China Early Pregnancy Ultrasound Cohort (CEPUC).

Methods: A stratified random sampling strategy was employed for QC on ultrasound images from 525 single fetuses between 11 and 13 +6 weeks of gestation across nine hospitals. The QC process consisted of two elements: (1) the retention of 17 types of ultrasound scans and (2) the assessment of each scan's content, which was scored out of 47 points. QC was performed twice: initially through hospital self-assessment (self-QC) and a subsequent review by the cohort team (second QC). The QC scores were calculated and compared across different groups using the Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results: The median number of retained ultrasound scans per person was 16.0 (interquartile range: 15.0-17.0). The median scores for self-QC and second QC were 44 points (interquartile range: 40-47) and 43 points (interquartile range: 38-46), respectively. The second QC scores were significantly lower than the self-QC scores (P < 0.001), with 225 cases (42.9%) scoring lower and 280 cases (53.3%) scoring equally. Excluding image magnification, the three items with the lowest scoring rates among the other 37 were: (1) coronal view of the cervical spine to the sacrum (62.3%), (2) assessing regurgitation in the tricuspid valve spectrum of the heart (63.4%), and (3) obtaining a three-dimensional (3D) image of the choroid plexus Sect. (78.1%).

Conclusions: QC in ultrasound is crucial for multicenter cohort studies, ensuring consistency and reliability across various sites. Both subjective and objective measurements should be seriously considered.

妊娠11 ~ 14周超声质量控制:来自中国早期妊娠超声队列的结果。
目的:评价中国早期妊娠超声队列(CEPUC)妊娠11 ~ 14周第一阶段超声扫描质量控制(QC)。方法:采用分层随机抽样的方法对9家医院525例妊娠11 ~ 13 +6周的单胎超声图像进行质控。质量控制过程包括两个要素:(1)保留17种超声波扫描结果;(2)评估每种扫描结果的内容,评分为47分。质量控制进行了两次:最初通过医院自我评估(自我质量控制),随后由队列小组进行审查(第二次质量控制)。使用卡方检验、Fisher精确检验或Wilcoxon符号秩检验计算和比较不同组间的QC分数。结果:每人保留超声扫描的中位数为16.0(四分位数范围为15.0-17.0)。自我质检和二次质检的中位数分别为44分(40-47分)和43分(38-46分)。结论:超声质量控制在多中心队列研究中至关重要,确保了不同部位的一致性和可靠性。主观和客观的测量都应该认真考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Medical Research
European Journal of Medical Research 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
247
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Medical Research publishes translational and clinical research of international interest across all medical disciplines, enabling clinicians and other researchers to learn about developments and innovations within these disciplines and across the boundaries between disciplines. The journal publishes high quality research and reviews and aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted research are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信