Brief cognitive screening tools for dementia in low-educated population from South America: A systematic review.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Diego Chambergo-Michilot, Nilton Custodio, Rosa Montesinos, Belen Custodio, Nelson Luis Cahuapaza-Gutierrez, Paulo Caramelli, Ismael Luis Calandri, Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki, Claudia Kimie Suemoto, Ricardo Allegri, Andrea Slachevsky, José F Parodi
{"title":"Brief cognitive screening tools for dementia in low-educated population from South America: A systematic review.","authors":"Diego Chambergo-Michilot, Nilton Custodio, Rosa Montesinos, Belen Custodio, Nelson Luis Cahuapaza-Gutierrez, Paulo Caramelli, Ismael Luis Calandri, Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki, Claudia Kimie Suemoto, Ricardo Allegri, Andrea Slachevsky, José F Parodi","doi":"10.1159/000548735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite less education being common in Latin America, there is no systematic review on the use of brief cognitive screening tools in illiterate and low-educated adults in the region. We systematically reviewed brief cognitive tests used to identify dementia in illiterate or low-educated adults from South America.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines. We searched four major databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE, for studies up to September 2023, and included observational studies that reported at least sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, positive predictive value, or negative predictive value of dementia screening tools in illiterate or low-educated (less than 6 years of education) adults from South America.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most studies in samples with illiteracy or low education across South America used brief cognitive screening tools adapted to the local population's language. Seventeen tests were identified, among them the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale(RUDAS) were the more common tools with good diagnostic accuracy in people with dementia. The sensitivity and specificity of reported brief cognitive screening tools were at least 90% and the area under the ROC curve was higher than 0.95.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The cut-off points for detecting dementia in illiterates and the low-educated adult population of South America should be adjusted for most brief cognitive tests. Developing specific and sensitive cognitive batteries for our region for cognitive evaluation in low-educated/illiterate participants is mandatory, including specific functionality evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548735","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite less education being common in Latin America, there is no systematic review on the use of brief cognitive screening tools in illiterate and low-educated adults in the region. We systematically reviewed brief cognitive tests used to identify dementia in illiterate or low-educated adults from South America.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines. We searched four major databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE, for studies up to September 2023, and included observational studies that reported at least sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, positive predictive value, or negative predictive value of dementia screening tools in illiterate or low-educated (less than 6 years of education) adults from South America.

Results: Most studies in samples with illiteracy or low education across South America used brief cognitive screening tools adapted to the local population's language. Seventeen tests were identified, among them the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale(RUDAS) were the more common tools with good diagnostic accuracy in people with dementia. The sensitivity and specificity of reported brief cognitive screening tools were at least 90% and the area under the ROC curve was higher than 0.95.

Conclusions: The cut-off points for detecting dementia in illiterates and the low-educated adult population of South America should be adjusted for most brief cognitive tests. Developing specific and sensitive cognitive batteries for our region for cognitive evaluation in low-educated/illiterate participants is mandatory, including specific functionality evaluation.

南美洲低教育人群痴呆的简短认知筛查工具:一项系统综述。
导读:尽管拉丁美洲普遍受教育程度较低,但没有对该地区文盲和受教育程度低的成年人使用简短认知筛查工具进行系统审查。我们系统地回顾了用于识别南美文盲或低教育程度成年人痴呆症的简短认知测试。方法:根据PRISMA和Cochrane指南进行系统评价。我们检索了四个主要数据库:PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和EMBASE,检索了截至2023年9月的研究,并纳入了观察性研究,这些研究报告了痴呆症筛查工具在南美洲文盲或受教育程度低(少于6年)的成年人中至少具有敏感性、特异性、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积、阳性预测值或阴性预测值。结果:大多数在南美洲文盲或教育程度低的样本中进行的研究使用了适合当地人口语言的简短认知筛选工具。确定了17项测试,其中迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)和罗兰通用痴呆评估量表(RUDAS)是对痴呆症患者诊断准确性较高的常见工具。所报道的简短认知筛查工具的敏感性和特异性至少为90%,ROC曲线下面积大于0.95。结论:南美洲文盲和受教育程度较低的成年人中检测痴呆的分界点应在大多数简短的认知测试中进行调整。开发特定的和敏感的认知电池为我们的地区的认知评估低教育/文盲参与者是强制性的,包括特定的功能评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: As a unique forum devoted exclusively to the study of cognitive dysfunction, ''Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders'' concentrates on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea and other neurodegenerative diseases. The journal draws from diverse related research disciplines such as psychogeriatrics, neuropsychology, clinical neurology, morphology, physiology, genetic molecular biology, pathology, biochemistry, immunology, pharmacology and pharmaceutics. Strong emphasis is placed on the publication of research findings from animal studies which are complemented by clinical and therapeutic experience to give an overall appreciation of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信