Impact of ocular aberrations and pupil diameter on vision with four daily multifocal contact lenses.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Elena Martínez-Plaza, Ainhoa Molina-Martín, Kevin Mena-Guevara, Dolores de Fez, Violeta Gómez-Vicente, David P Piñero
{"title":"Impact of ocular aberrations and pupil diameter on vision with four daily multifocal contact lenses.","authors":"Elena Martínez-Plaza, Ainhoa Molina-Martín, Kevin Mena-Guevara, Dolores de Fez, Violeta Gómez-Vicente, David P Piñero","doi":"10.1080/08164622.2025.2565457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Understanding which ocular optical factors are clearly influencing the visual performance achieved with MFCLs is essential for conducting a more optimised procedure when fitting this type of lenses.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess and compare the induction of ocular higher-order aberrations by four daily multifocal contact lenses and evaluate the influence of pupil diameter on their performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomised, crossover study evaluated four contact lenses in 20 presbyopic participants. Subjective refraction, distance/intermediate/near visual acuity and patient-reported visual satisfaction, and pupil diameter under four lighting conditions were assessed. Pupillary dynamic were calculated as the difference between mesopic and photopic pupil sizes. Primary coma, trefoil, spherical aberration, and higher-order aberration (HOA) root mean square were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant negative induction of primary spherical aberration was found with all lenses (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.04); being greater with MyDay than Moist in both eyes and with Total1 than Moist in non-dominant eyes (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.02). Coma and HOA increased significantly with all lenses (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.03), except for the Moist lens in dominant eyes; being greater with Total1 than Moist in dominant eyes (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.049). Odd aberrations showed inverse correlations with intermediate/near visual acuity and patient satisfaction (rho≤-0.58, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.04). Greater pupillary dynamic variation was significantly associated with better intermediate/near visual acuity for MyDay and Biotrue MCLs in dominant eyes (rho≤-0.59, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Centre-near multifocal contact lenses induce negative primary spherical aberration. Interestingly, greater coma aberration correlates with improved visual acuity and patient satisfaction at intermediate and near distances. Additionally, larger pupillary dynamic variation may enhance visual acuity and satisfaction in certain presbyopic contact lens wearers.</p>","PeriodicalId":10214,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2025.2565457","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical relevance: Understanding which ocular optical factors are clearly influencing the visual performance achieved with MFCLs is essential for conducting a more optimised procedure when fitting this type of lenses.

Background: To assess and compare the induction of ocular higher-order aberrations by four daily multifocal contact lenses and evaluate the influence of pupil diameter on their performance.

Methods: A randomised, crossover study evaluated four contact lenses in 20 presbyopic participants. Subjective refraction, distance/intermediate/near visual acuity and patient-reported visual satisfaction, and pupil diameter under four lighting conditions were assessed. Pupillary dynamic were calculated as the difference between mesopic and photopic pupil sizes. Primary coma, trefoil, spherical aberration, and higher-order aberration (HOA) root mean square were analysed.

Results: A significant negative induction of primary spherical aberration was found with all lenses (p ≤ 0.04); being greater with MyDay than Moist in both eyes and with Total1 than Moist in non-dominant eyes (p ≤ 0.02). Coma and HOA increased significantly with all lenses (p ≤ 0.03), except for the Moist lens in dominant eyes; being greater with Total1 than Moist in dominant eyes (p ≤ 0.049). Odd aberrations showed inverse correlations with intermediate/near visual acuity and patient satisfaction (rho≤-0.58, p ≤ 0.04). Greater pupillary dynamic variation was significantly associated with better intermediate/near visual acuity for MyDay and Biotrue MCLs in dominant eyes (rho≤-0.59, p ≤ 0.04).

Conclusions: Centre-near multifocal contact lenses induce negative primary spherical aberration. Interestingly, greater coma aberration correlates with improved visual acuity and patient satisfaction at intermediate and near distances. Additionally, larger pupillary dynamic variation may enhance visual acuity and satisfaction in certain presbyopic contact lens wearers.

眼像差和瞳孔直径对四次日用多焦隐形眼镜视力的影响。
临床相关性:了解哪些眼部光学因素明显影响mfcl获得的视力表现,对于在安装这种类型的晶状体时进行更优化的程序至关重要。背景:评价和比较四种日常多焦隐形眼镜对眼部高阶像差的诱导作用,并评价瞳孔直径对其性能的影响。方法:一项随机交叉研究评估了20名老花眼参与者的四种隐形眼镜。评估四种照明条件下的主观屈光、远/中/近视力和患者报告的视觉满意度以及瞳孔直径。瞳孔动力学计算为中视和光视瞳孔大小之差。分析原发彗差、三叶草差、球差和高阶像差(HOA)均方根。结果:所有镜片的初级球差均呈显著负诱导(p≤0.04);双眼MyDay大于Moist,非优势眼Total1大于Moist (p≤0.02)。除优势眼湿润晶状体外,其余晶状体的昏迷和HOA均显著升高(p≤0.03);优势眼Total1大于Moist (p≤0.049)。奇像差与中/近视力和患者满意度呈负相关(rho≤-0.58,p≤0.04)。MyDay和Biotrue mcl的优势眼瞳孔动态变化越大,中/近视力越好(rho≤-0.59,p≤0.04)。结论:近中心多焦隐形眼镜可诱发负初级球差。有趣的是,在中距离和近距离时,更大的彗差与更好的视力和患者满意度相关。此外,较大的瞳孔动态变化可能会提高某些老花眼配戴者的视力和满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Optometry is a peer reviewed journal listed by ISI and abstracted by PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Citation Index and Current Contents. It publishes original research papers and reviews in clinical optometry and vision science. Debate and discussion of controversial scientific and clinical issues is encouraged and letters to the Editor and short communications expressing points of view on matters within the Journal''s areas of interest are welcome. The Journal is published six times annually.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信