{"title":"Implications of coexisting neural antibodies with glial fibrillary acidic protein autoimmunity: a single center retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Xiumei Wei, Guanghui Liu, Dongmei Wang, Sanming Jie, Bingbing Li, Yongming Wu, Suyue Pan, Shengnan Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12883-025-04439-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>This study aimed to elucidate the differences between patients with anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) antibodies who exhibited concurrent positivity for other neuro-antibodies and those who did not.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hospitalised patients demonstrating anti-GFAP antibody positivity in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were retrospectively collected and followed up from March 2019 to July 2022. Data including clinical features, laboratory results, imaging findings, therapy, and prognosis were extracted from the medical record system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven patients with positive anti-GFAP antibody in CSF were included. Ten patients exhibited concomitant other neuro-antibodies and were categorised as the \"overlapping group\". Compared to the non-overlapping group, the incidence of seizures was significantly higher in the overlapping syndrome group (50% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.003), and a similar trend was observed for status epilepticus (30% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.052). Encephalitis was more prevalent in the overlapping group (60.0%) than in the non-overlapping group (11.1%) (P = 0.005). Serum white blood cell and neutrophil counts were significantly higher in the overlapping group compared to the non-overlapping group (P = 0.037, P = 0.042, respectively). The overlapping group demonstrated a higher percentage of immunosuppressant usage and a longer hospital stay compared to the non-overlapping group. During the follow-up, two patients in the overlapping group expired, while all the patients in the non-overlapping group survived.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with anti-GFAP antibodies and concurrent other neuro-antibodies exhibited different clinical features compared to non-overlapping cases. We suggest that in the presence of coexisting neuronal surface antibodies, these specific neuro-antibodies were predominant in clinical manifestations and prognosis, rather than the anti-GFAP antibody, especially when in a relatively high titer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9170,"journal":{"name":"BMC Neurology","volume":"25 1","pages":"401"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-025-04439-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose: This study aimed to elucidate the differences between patients with anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) antibodies who exhibited concurrent positivity for other neuro-antibodies and those who did not.
Methods: Hospitalised patients demonstrating anti-GFAP antibody positivity in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were retrospectively collected and followed up from March 2019 to July 2022. Data including clinical features, laboratory results, imaging findings, therapy, and prognosis were extracted from the medical record system.
Results: Thirty-seven patients with positive anti-GFAP antibody in CSF were included. Ten patients exhibited concomitant other neuro-antibodies and were categorised as the "overlapping group". Compared to the non-overlapping group, the incidence of seizures was significantly higher in the overlapping syndrome group (50% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.003), and a similar trend was observed for status epilepticus (30% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.052). Encephalitis was more prevalent in the overlapping group (60.0%) than in the non-overlapping group (11.1%) (P = 0.005). Serum white blood cell and neutrophil counts were significantly higher in the overlapping group compared to the non-overlapping group (P = 0.037, P = 0.042, respectively). The overlapping group demonstrated a higher percentage of immunosuppressant usage and a longer hospital stay compared to the non-overlapping group. During the follow-up, two patients in the overlapping group expired, while all the patients in the non-overlapping group survived.
Conclusions: Patients with anti-GFAP antibodies and concurrent other neuro-antibodies exhibited different clinical features compared to non-overlapping cases. We suggest that in the presence of coexisting neuronal surface antibodies, these specific neuro-antibodies were predominant in clinical manifestations and prognosis, rather than the anti-GFAP antibody, especially when in a relatively high titer.
背景和目的:本研究旨在阐明抗神经胶质原纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)抗体并发其他神经抗体阳性和非阳性患者之间的差异。方法:回顾性收集2019年3月至2022年7月脑脊液中抗gfap抗体阳性的住院患者并进行随访。从病历系统中提取临床特征、实验室结果、影像学表现、治疗和预后等数据。结果:37例脑脊液抗gfap抗体阳性。10例患者同时出现其他神经抗体,被归类为“重叠组”。与非重叠综合征组相比,重叠综合征组癫痫发作发生率显著高于非重叠综合征组(50% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.003),癫痫持续状态发生率也有类似趋势(30% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.052)。脑炎发生率重叠组(60.0%)高于非重叠组(11.1%)(P = 0.005)。重叠组血清白细胞和中性粒细胞计数显著高于未重叠组(P = 0.037, P = 0.042)。与非重叠组相比,重叠组显示出更高比例的免疫抑制剂使用和更长的住院时间。随访期间,重叠组有2例患者死亡,而非重叠组全部患者存活。结论:抗gfap抗体和并发其他神经抗体的患者与非重叠病例相比表现出不同的临床特征。我们认为,在神经元表面抗体共存的情况下,这些特异性神经抗体在临床表现和预后中占主导地位,而不是抗gfap抗体,特别是当滴度相对较高时。
期刊介绍:
BMC Neurology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of neurological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.