The additional role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in identifying lesions in pathological nipple discharge patients: a prospective study comparing with DCE-MRI.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Qinghua Niu, Shiyun Yang, Lianfang Du, Chao Jia, Gang Li, Yingyu Cai, An Chen, Fan Li
{"title":"The additional role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in identifying lesions in pathological nipple discharge patients: a prospective study comparing with DCE-MRI.","authors":"Qinghua Niu, Shiyun Yang, Lianfang Du, Chao Jia, Gang Li, Yingyu Cai, An Chen, Fan Li","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the auxiliary role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the etiological diagnosis of pathological nipple discharge (PND) and compare its effectiveness with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study conducted from March 2021 to February 2024, PND patients underwent breast ultrasound and DCE-MRI after initial history and physical examination. Lesions were categorized as mass or non-mass-like on baseline US and assessed for vascularity using color Doppler. CEUS was utilized to refine the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) classification. Logistic regression identified risk factors, and diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 116 lesions from 112 PND patients were analyzed. CEUS-assisted ultrasound showed increased specificity (ranging from 50.0% to 80.0% compared to US alone, p = 0.009) while maintaining sensitivity. Of the 81 patients who underwent DCE-MRI, CEUS demonstrated a higher positive predictive value (83.3% vs. 75.5%), with comparable negative predictive values (97.0% vs. 96.4%). CEUS was particularly effective in accurately diagnosing benign lesions that were overestimated by DCE-MRI and in identifying ductal carcinoma in situ with greater precision than US alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The auxiliary use of CEUS with ultrasound improves the specificity and positive predictive value in diagnosing PND-associated malignancies and serves as a valuable secondary imaging method to DCE-MRI, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies of benign lesions.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>CEUS can enhance the diagnostic accuracy of PND, effectively differentiating benign from malignant lesions, and its integration into clinical practice could offer significant benefits in patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the auxiliary role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the etiological diagnosis of pathological nipple discharge (PND) and compare its effectiveness with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI).

Methods: In this prospective study conducted from March 2021 to February 2024, PND patients underwent breast ultrasound and DCE-MRI after initial history and physical examination. Lesions were categorized as mass or non-mass-like on baseline US and assessed for vascularity using color Doppler. CEUS was utilized to refine the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) classification. Logistic regression identified risk factors, and diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results: A total of 116 lesions from 112 PND patients were analyzed. CEUS-assisted ultrasound showed increased specificity (ranging from 50.0% to 80.0% compared to US alone, p = 0.009) while maintaining sensitivity. Of the 81 patients who underwent DCE-MRI, CEUS demonstrated a higher positive predictive value (83.3% vs. 75.5%), with comparable negative predictive values (97.0% vs. 96.4%). CEUS was particularly effective in accurately diagnosing benign lesions that were overestimated by DCE-MRI and in identifying ductal carcinoma in situ with greater precision than US alone.

Conclusion: The auxiliary use of CEUS with ultrasound improves the specificity and positive predictive value in diagnosing PND-associated malignancies and serves as a valuable secondary imaging method to DCE-MRI, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies of benign lesions.

Advances in knowledge: CEUS can enhance the diagnostic accuracy of PND, effectively differentiating benign from malignant lesions, and its integration into clinical practice could offer significant benefits in patient management.

对比增强超声在鉴别病理性乳头溢液患者病变中的额外作用:一项与DCE-MRI比较的前瞻性研究。
目的:探讨超声造影(CEUS)在病理性乳头溢液(PND)病因诊断中的辅助作用,并与动态磁共振造影(DCE-MRI)的诊断效果进行比较。方法:本前瞻性研究于2021年3月至2024年2月进行,PND患者在初始病史和体格检查后接受乳房超声和DCE-MRI检查。病灶在基线超声上被分类为肿块或非肿块样,并使用彩色多普勒评估血管性。超声造影用于完善乳腺成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)分类。Logistic回归识别危险因素,并使用受试者工作特征曲线分析评估诊断效果。结果:对112例PND患者116个病变进行了分析。超声造影辅助下的超声在保持敏感性的同时显示出更高的特异性(与单独超声造影相比,特异性从50.0%到80.0%不等,p = 0.009)。在接受DCE-MRI的81例患者中,超声造影显示出更高的阳性预测值(83.3%对75.5%),阴性预测值(97.0%对96.4%)相当。超声造影在准确诊断DCE-MRI高估的良性病变方面特别有效,在识别导管原位癌方面比单独超声造影更准确。结论超声辅助超声造影提高了诊断pnd相关恶性肿瘤的特异性和阳性预测值,是一种有价值的DCE-MRI辅助成像方法,可减少不必要的良性病变活检。知识进展:超声造影可提高PND的诊断准确性,有效区分良恶性病变,将超声造影应用于临床可为患者管理带来显著益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信