{"title":"Unlocking the Potential of Training: Enhancing Inter-reader Agreement in Background Parenchymal Enhancement Assessment.","authors":"Danping Huang, Sina Wang, Zhendong Luo, Lijun Chen, Hui Zeng, Fengxia Zeng, Jialing Liu, Weimin Xu, Genggeng Qin","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the inter-reader agreement of visual background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) assessment and determine if training can improve this assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five hundred and forty-eight women who underwent contrast-enhanced mammography from 2018 through 2022 were included. A total of 2135 images were read by six radiologists (Group A) independently and rated BPE with the ordinal scale: minimal, mild, moderate, or marked. After a dedicated training, the same cases were reread in a new random order within two weeks. To further verify the effectiveness of training, four radiologists (Group B) from four different institutions were invited to assess BPE in the same way with 800 images. The accuracy of each reader and agreement on BPE categorization between radiologists and the reference standard were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of correct BPE assignments increased from 62.3% (range, 48.6%-73.6%) to 75.5% (range, 69.0%-79.7%) after training in Group A, and increased from 55.7% (range, 52.0%-58.9%) to 66.9% (range, 62.0%-71.0%) after training in Group B. With training, inter-reader agreement increased from fair to moderate in both Group A (κ = 0.32 to 0.52) and Group B (κ = 0.40 to 0.53), indicating readers learned and the training can be rolled out to different institutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The initial inter-reader agreement in assessing BPE among radiologists was fair but showed enhancement following training, highlighting the necessity of training and standard sets of reference images that should be made available for training.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This study demonstrates that dedicated training improves inter-reader agreement in BPE assessment on CEM, highlighting the need for standardized training programs to enhance consistency in clinical practice and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf240","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the inter-reader agreement of visual background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) assessment and determine if training can improve this assessment.
Methods: Five hundred and forty-eight women who underwent contrast-enhanced mammography from 2018 through 2022 were included. A total of 2135 images were read by six radiologists (Group A) independently and rated BPE with the ordinal scale: minimal, mild, moderate, or marked. After a dedicated training, the same cases were reread in a new random order within two weeks. To further verify the effectiveness of training, four radiologists (Group B) from four different institutions were invited to assess BPE in the same way with 800 images. The accuracy of each reader and agreement on BPE categorization between radiologists and the reference standard were evaluated.
Results: The percentage of correct BPE assignments increased from 62.3% (range, 48.6%-73.6%) to 75.5% (range, 69.0%-79.7%) after training in Group A, and increased from 55.7% (range, 52.0%-58.9%) to 66.9% (range, 62.0%-71.0%) after training in Group B. With training, inter-reader agreement increased from fair to moderate in both Group A (κ = 0.32 to 0.52) and Group B (κ = 0.40 to 0.53), indicating readers learned and the training can be rolled out to different institutions.
Conclusion: The initial inter-reader agreement in assessing BPE among radiologists was fair but showed enhancement following training, highlighting the necessity of training and standard sets of reference images that should be made available for training.
Advances in knowledge: This study demonstrates that dedicated training improves inter-reader agreement in BPE assessment on CEM, highlighting the need for standardized training programs to enhance consistency in clinical practice and research.
期刊介绍:
BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences.
Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840
- Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks
- ISSN: 0007-1285
- eISSN: 1748-880X
Open Access option