Differential dementia risks of motoric cognitive risk syndrome and mild cognitive impairment among older adults in China: a 7-year cohort study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Bochao Niu, Dan Chen, Zhezhe Niu, Jian Wang
{"title":"Differential dementia risks of motoric cognitive risk syndrome and mild cognitive impairment among older adults in China: a 7-year cohort study.","authors":"Bochao Niu, Dan Chen, Zhezhe Niu, Jian Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-06432-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) are two pre-dementia stages, which may exist independently or concurrently, and both increase the risk of dementia. The association between MCI, MCR, and their co-occurrence with dementia risk in the elderly Chinese population remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore the relationship of MCI, MCR, and their co-occurrence with the incidence of dementia among the elderly population in China, based on a nationwide large-scale survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2,411 elderly individuals from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) were included in this study. At baseline in 2011, all eligible participants were categorized into four groups: CHI (cognitively healthy individuals) group, MCI (individuals with MCI alone) group, MCR (individuals with MCR alone) group, and MCI + MCR (individuals with both MCI and MCR) group. After a 7-year follow-up, logistic regression models were used to analyze the longitudinal association between pre-dementia stages and the onset of dementia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the prevalence rates were 14.5% for MCI group, 9.8% for MCR group, and 2.2% for MCI + MCR group. The median total cognitive scores at baseline were 16 points for both CHI group and MCR group, 9 points for MCI group, and 8.7 points for MCI + MCR group (P < 0.001). After 7 years of follow-up, the cognitive scores remained unchanged in MCI group, decreased by 1 point in both the CHI group and MCI + MCR group, and decreased by 2 points in MCR group (P < 0.001). The 7-year dementia incidence was 4.8%. Multivariate logistic regression model showed that the risk of dementia was significantly associated with MCI (OR = 2.319, 95%CI:1.420-3.785, P < 0.001), MCR (OR = 2.488, 95%CI:1.441-4.294, P = 0.001), and MCI + MCR (OR = 3.226, 95% CI:1.340-7.762, P = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both MCI and MCR were associated with an increased risk of dementia, and the co-occurrence of MCI and MCR conferred a higher risk of dementia. Although the MCR group showed no significant baseline cognitive impairment, their subsequent cognitive decline and dementia risk were higher than those of the MCI group. Therefore, promoting MCR screening in China's primary healthcare system may be more feasible than MCI screening, which could help in early identification of high-risk populations and the implementation of targeted interventions to delay or prevent the onset of dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"746"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481751/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06432-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) are two pre-dementia stages, which may exist independently or concurrently, and both increase the risk of dementia. The association between MCI, MCR, and their co-occurrence with dementia risk in the elderly Chinese population remains unclear.

Objective: This study aims to explore the relationship of MCI, MCR, and their co-occurrence with the incidence of dementia among the elderly population in China, based on a nationwide large-scale survey.

Methods: A total of 2,411 elderly individuals from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) were included in this study. At baseline in 2011, all eligible participants were categorized into four groups: CHI (cognitively healthy individuals) group, MCI (individuals with MCI alone) group, MCR (individuals with MCR alone) group, and MCI + MCR (individuals with both MCI and MCR) group. After a 7-year follow-up, logistic regression models were used to analyze the longitudinal association between pre-dementia stages and the onset of dementia.

Results: At baseline, the prevalence rates were 14.5% for MCI group, 9.8% for MCR group, and 2.2% for MCI + MCR group. The median total cognitive scores at baseline were 16 points for both CHI group and MCR group, 9 points for MCI group, and 8.7 points for MCI + MCR group (P < 0.001). After 7 years of follow-up, the cognitive scores remained unchanged in MCI group, decreased by 1 point in both the CHI group and MCI + MCR group, and decreased by 2 points in MCR group (P < 0.001). The 7-year dementia incidence was 4.8%. Multivariate logistic regression model showed that the risk of dementia was significantly associated with MCI (OR = 2.319, 95%CI:1.420-3.785, P < 0.001), MCR (OR = 2.488, 95%CI:1.441-4.294, P = 0.001), and MCI + MCR (OR = 3.226, 95% CI:1.340-7.762, P = 0.009).

Conclusion: Both MCI and MCR were associated with an increased risk of dementia, and the co-occurrence of MCI and MCR conferred a higher risk of dementia. Although the MCR group showed no significant baseline cognitive impairment, their subsequent cognitive decline and dementia risk were higher than those of the MCI group. Therefore, promoting MCR screening in China's primary healthcare system may be more feasible than MCI screening, which could help in early identification of high-risk populations and the implementation of targeted interventions to delay or prevent the onset of dementia.

中国老年人运动认知风险综合征和轻度认知障碍的痴呆风险差异:一项为期7年的队列研究
背景:轻度认知障碍(Mild cognitive impairment, MCI)和运动认知风险综合征(motoric cognitive risk syndrome, MCR)是痴呆前期的两个阶段,它们可能独立存在,也可能同时存在,都增加痴呆的风险。在中国老年人中,MCI、MCR及其与痴呆风险共发之间的关系尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在通过全国范围的大规模调查,探讨中国老年人群中MCI、MCR及其共发病与痴呆的关系。方法:从中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS)中选取2411名老年人作为研究对象。在2011年基线时,所有符合条件的参与者分为四组:CHI(认知健康个体)组、MCI(单独患有MCI的个体)组、MCR(单独患有MCR的个体)组和MCI + MCR(同时患有MCI和MCR的个体)组。经过7年的随访,采用logistic回归模型分析痴呆前期阶段与痴呆发病之间的纵向关联。结果:基线时,MCI组患病率为14.5%,MCR组为9.8%,MCI + MCR组为2.2%。基线时,CHI组和MCR组的认知总分中位数为16分,MCI组为9分,MCI + MCR组为8.7分(P)。结论:MCI和MCR均与痴呆风险增加相关,MCI和MCR同时出现会增加痴呆风险。虽然MCR组没有表现出明显的基线认知障碍,但他们随后的认知能力下降和痴呆风险高于MCI组。因此,在中国的初级卫生保健系统中推广MCR筛查可能比MCI筛查更可行,这有助于早期识别高危人群,并实施有针对性的干预措施,以延迟或预防痴呆症的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信