Use of the BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia plus Panel to characterize the etiology of lower respiratory tract infections among hospitalized patients in Southern Province, Sri Lanka.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Zachary A Weishampel, Ajith Nagahawatte, Gaya Wijayaratne, Subodha S Wickramasinghe, Bradly Nicholson, Jack Anderson, Sky Vanderburg, Chathuranga Lakmal Fonseka, Madureka Premamali, Robert J Rolfe, U H B Y Dilshan, Ruvini Kurukulasooriya, D L B Piyasiri, Truls Østbye, Christopher W Woods, Lana Abusalem, Armstrong Obale, L Gayani Tillekeratne, Champica K Bodinayake
{"title":"Use of the BIOFIRE<sup>®</sup> FILMARRAY<sup>®</sup> Pneumonia plus Panel to characterize the etiology of lower respiratory tract infections among hospitalized patients in Southern Province, Sri Lanka.","authors":"Zachary A Weishampel, Ajith Nagahawatte, Gaya Wijayaratne, Subodha S Wickramasinghe, Bradly Nicholson, Jack Anderson, Sky Vanderburg, Chathuranga Lakmal Fonseka, Madureka Premamali, Robert J Rolfe, U H B Y Dilshan, Ruvini Kurukulasooriya, D L B Piyasiri, Truls Østbye, Christopher W Woods, Lana Abusalem, Armstrong Obale, L Gayani Tillekeratne, Champica K Bodinayake","doi":"10.1186/s12879-025-11562-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) account for a heavy burden of illness in low- and middle-income country settings, but the etiology of these infections is often unknown. In this study, we applied the BIOFIRE<sup>®</sup> FILMARRAY<sup>®</sup> Pneumonia plus Panel, a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay with bacterial, viral, and antibacterial resistance gene targets, on sputum samples to evaluate the etiology of community-acquired LRTI among hospitalized patients in southern Sri Lanka.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled children and adults hospitalized with LRTIs at a public tertiary care hospital in southern Sri Lanka from 2019 to 2021. Demographic and clinical data were collected, and a sputum sample for each patient was tested using the Pneumonia plus Panel. Assay results were compared with sputum culture results. Fisher's exact test was applied to identify association between the presence of viruses, bacteria, or antimicrobial resistant genes and the findings of the chest radiographs during hospitalization as well as associations between the genomic concentration identified through the panel and the bacteria known to cause typical pneumonia infection included in the panel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 267 patients tested, the most detected bacteria by the Pneumonia plus Panel were the Klebsiella pneumoniae group (41.9%), Staphylococcus aureus (34.5%), and the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex (32.6%). The most detected viruses were the human rhinovirus/enterovirus (19.5%) and influenza A (10.9%). In total, 211 patients (79.0%) had at least one gram-negative bacterium and 139 patients (52.1%) had at least one gram-positive bacteria. As for Antimicrobial Resistance, 96 patients (40.0%) had at least one carbapenem resistant gene, 56 patients (21.0%) had an extended spectrum beta-lactamase related gene, and 42 patients (15.7%) had a methicillin resistant gene. Only 15 patients (5.6%) were identified to have Pneumonia plus Panel results matching with sputum culture results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that patients with LRTI in Southern Province, Sri Lanka have a high prevalence of gram-negative bacteria and antibacterial resistance in their sputum samples. However, it remains difficult to differentiate isolates that are colonizers not leading to disease versus the true cause of infection via the use of the BIOFIRE<sup>®</sup> FILMARRAY<sup>®</sup> Pneumonia plus Panel on sputum samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":8981,"journal":{"name":"BMC Infectious Diseases","volume":"25 1","pages":"1178"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11562-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) account for a heavy burden of illness in low- and middle-income country settings, but the etiology of these infections is often unknown. In this study, we applied the BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia plus Panel, a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay with bacterial, viral, and antibacterial resistance gene targets, on sputum samples to evaluate the etiology of community-acquired LRTI among hospitalized patients in southern Sri Lanka.

Methods: We enrolled children and adults hospitalized with LRTIs at a public tertiary care hospital in southern Sri Lanka from 2019 to 2021. Demographic and clinical data were collected, and a sputum sample for each patient was tested using the Pneumonia plus Panel. Assay results were compared with sputum culture results. Fisher's exact test was applied to identify association between the presence of viruses, bacteria, or antimicrobial resistant genes and the findings of the chest radiographs during hospitalization as well as associations between the genomic concentration identified through the panel and the bacteria known to cause typical pneumonia infection included in the panel.

Results: In 267 patients tested, the most detected bacteria by the Pneumonia plus Panel were the Klebsiella pneumoniae group (41.9%), Staphylococcus aureus (34.5%), and the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex (32.6%). The most detected viruses were the human rhinovirus/enterovirus (19.5%) and influenza A (10.9%). In total, 211 patients (79.0%) had at least one gram-negative bacterium and 139 patients (52.1%) had at least one gram-positive bacteria. As for Antimicrobial Resistance, 96 patients (40.0%) had at least one carbapenem resistant gene, 56 patients (21.0%) had an extended spectrum beta-lactamase related gene, and 42 patients (15.7%) had a methicillin resistant gene. Only 15 patients (5.6%) were identified to have Pneumonia plus Panel results matching with sputum culture results.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that patients with LRTI in Southern Province, Sri Lanka have a high prevalence of gram-negative bacteria and antibacterial resistance in their sputum samples. However, it remains difficult to differentiate isolates that are colonizers not leading to disease versus the true cause of infection via the use of the BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia plus Panel on sputum samples.

使用BIOFIRE®FILMARRAY®肺炎+面板来描述斯里兰卡南部省住院患者下呼吸道感染的病因。
背景:下呼吸道感染(LRTIs)是低收入和中等收入国家环境中一个沉重的疾病负担,但这些感染的病因往往是未知的。在这项研究中,我们应用BIOFIRE®FILMARRAY®Pneumonia plus Panel(一种具有细菌、病毒和抗菌耐药基因靶点的多重聚合酶链反应试验)对痰样本进行检测,以评估斯里兰卡南部住院患者社区获得性LRTI的病因。方法:我们招募了2019年至2021年在斯里兰卡南部一家公立三级保健医院因下呼吸道感染住院的儿童和成人。收集了人口统计学和临床数据,并使用肺炎加小组对每位患者的痰样本进行了检测。测定结果与痰培养结果比较。应用Fisher精确检验来确定病毒、细菌或抗微生物药物耐药基因的存在与住院期间胸片检查结果之间的关系,以及通过筛查小组确定的基因组浓度与筛查小组中已知引起典型肺炎感染的细菌之间的关系。结果:在267例患者中,肺炎加小组检出最多的细菌是肺炎克雷伯菌群(41.9%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(34.5%)和钙醋-鲍曼不动杆菌复合体(32.6%)。检出最多的病毒是人鼻病毒/肠道病毒(19.5%)和甲型流感(10.9%)。211例(79.0%)患者检出至少1个革兰氏阴性菌,139例(52.1%)患者检出至少1个革兰氏阳性菌。在耐药方面,96例患者(40.0%)存在至少一种碳青霉烯类耐药基因,56例患者(21.0%)存在扩展谱β -内酰胺酶相关基因,42例患者(15.7%)存在甲氧西林耐药基因。只有15例患者(5.6%)被确定为肺炎+ Panel结果与痰培养结果相匹配。结论:我们的研究结果表明,斯里兰卡南部省LRTI患者的痰样本中存在较高的革兰氏阴性菌患病率和抗菌药物耐药性。然而,通过对痰样本使用BIOFIRE®FILMARRAY®Pneumonia plus Panel,仍然很难区分是非导致疾病的定植菌与感染的真正原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Infectious Diseases
BMC Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
860
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Infectious Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of infectious and sexually transmitted diseases in humans, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信