A 20-Year Experience with Round Smooth Saline Breast Implant Explantation: Reasons, Trends, and Management.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Ted S Eisenberg, Julianne Pilla, George Chapa
{"title":"A 20-Year Experience with Round Smooth Saline Breast Implant Explantation: Reasons, Trends, and Management.","authors":"Ted S Eisenberg, Julianne Pilla, George Chapa","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-05242-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent literature has identified a rising trend in breast implant explantation, frequently attributed to concerns about implant safety and long-term health risks. The purpose of this study is to analyze patient-reported reasons for explantation and to share the senior author's experience with implant removal and postoperative management over a 20 year period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted of 4909 patients who underwent primary cosmetic breast augmentation between 2005 and 2024. Of these, 77 patients elected to undergo explantation. All explanted patients had round, smooth Mentor saline implants. Only four patients had their original augmentation performed by another surgeon. Post-explantation management included placement of two 6-inch compression bandages for one to three weeks, followed by aesthetic reassessment at an average of two months. Patient demographics-including age, height, weight, pregnancy history, implant size, tobacco use, and pertinent medical history-were recorded. Time from implantation to explantation and patient-reported reasons were also documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 77 patients underwent bilateral explantation, representing 1.57% of the 4909 augmentations performed by the senior author. The average duration from implantation to explantation was 12 years, and the average patient age at explantation was 43 years. The average implant volume was 413 cc. Between 2016 and 2024, there was a 382.9% increase in explantation procedures, consistent with global trends. The most common reason for explantation was weight gain and the perception of breasts being too large (n = 27, 35.06%), followed by implant deflation (n = 24, 31.17%). One patient underwent implant replacement with a smaller volume at 9 months, another opted for larger implants 5 years later, and one patient underwent mastopexy 3 months after explantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the trend in breast implant explantation continues to rise, the findings in this study contrast with current literature citing implant safety concerns as the primary motivator. In this cohort, the most common reasons for removal were significant weight gain resulting in dissatisfaction with breast size, implant deflation, and a history of multiple prior cosmetic breast surgeries. Postoperative management with simple explantation and compression bandaging yielded satisfactory aesthetic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iii: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-05242-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent literature has identified a rising trend in breast implant explantation, frequently attributed to concerns about implant safety and long-term health risks. The purpose of this study is to analyze patient-reported reasons for explantation and to share the senior author's experience with implant removal and postoperative management over a 20 year period.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 4909 patients who underwent primary cosmetic breast augmentation between 2005 and 2024. Of these, 77 patients elected to undergo explantation. All explanted patients had round, smooth Mentor saline implants. Only four patients had their original augmentation performed by another surgeon. Post-explantation management included placement of two 6-inch compression bandages for one to three weeks, followed by aesthetic reassessment at an average of two months. Patient demographics-including age, height, weight, pregnancy history, implant size, tobacco use, and pertinent medical history-were recorded. Time from implantation to explantation and patient-reported reasons were also documented.

Results: A total of 77 patients underwent bilateral explantation, representing 1.57% of the 4909 augmentations performed by the senior author. The average duration from implantation to explantation was 12 years, and the average patient age at explantation was 43 years. The average implant volume was 413 cc. Between 2016 and 2024, there was a 382.9% increase in explantation procedures, consistent with global trends. The most common reason for explantation was weight gain and the perception of breasts being too large (n = 27, 35.06%), followed by implant deflation (n = 24, 31.17%). One patient underwent implant replacement with a smaller volume at 9 months, another opted for larger implants 5 years later, and one patient underwent mastopexy 3 months after explantation.

Conclusion: While the trend in breast implant explantation continues to rise, the findings in this study contrast with current literature citing implant safety concerns as the primary motivator. In this cohort, the most common reasons for removal were significant weight gain resulting in dissatisfaction with breast size, implant deflation, and a history of multiple prior cosmetic breast surgeries. Postoperative management with simple explantation and compression bandaging yielded satisfactory aesthetic outcomes.

Level of evidence iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266 .

圆形光滑生理盐水乳房植入20年的经验:原因、趋势和处理。
背景:最近的文献表明,出于对植入物安全性和长期健康风险的担忧,乳房植入物移植呈上升趋势。本研究的目的是分析患者报告的植体切除的原因,并分享资深作者20年来在植体切除和术后处理方面的经验。方法:回顾性分析2005年至2024年间4909例进行了首次隆胸手术的患者。其中,77例患者选择接受移植。所有移植的患者都有圆形、光滑的Mentor生理盐水植入物。只有4名患者接受了其他外科医生的隆胸手术。术后处理包括放置两根6英寸的压缩绷带一到三周,然后平均两个月进行美学重新评估。记录患者的人口统计数据,包括年龄、身高、体重、妊娠史、种植体大小、吸烟情况和相关病史。从植入到移植的时间和患者报告的原因也被记录下来。结果:77例患者行双侧植体,占资深作者4909例植体的1.57%。从植入到移植的平均时间为12年,移植时患者平均年龄为43岁。平均种植体体积为413毫升。2016年至2024年间,外植体手术增加了382.9%,与全球趋势一致。最常见的原因是体重增加和感觉乳房过大(n = 27, 35.06%),其次是假体收缩(n = 24, 31.17%)。1例患者在9个月时进行了体积较小的假体置换,另1例患者在5年后选择了体积较大的假体,1例患者在移植后3个月进行了乳房固定术。结论:虽然乳房植入物的趋势持续上升,但本研究的结果与目前文献中认为植入物安全是主要动机的研究结果形成了对比。在这个队列中,最常见的切除原因是体重明显增加导致对乳房大小的不满,植入物收缩,以及多次乳房整容手术的历史。术后简单的外植和压迫包扎取得了满意的美观效果。证据等级iii:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www.springer.com/00266。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信