{"title":"What is mental pain? A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative research on the lived experience of mental pain.","authors":"Samy Kozlowitz,Alexandre Ribeiro,Jordan Sibeoni,Baptiste Brossard,Astrid Chevance","doi":"10.1159/000548567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nMental pain-a pain not primarily felt in the body-is a predictor of suicide and is often described as one of the most distressing aspects of depression. However, the absence of a clear definition hampers both research and clinical practice. This metasynthesis aims to characterize the lived experience of mental pain to inform the future development of a definition.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science to identify qualitative studies reporting first-person accounts of mental pain. Thematic synthesis was used to generate descriptive and analytical themes, drawing on semantic, clinical, and phenomenological insights. The quality of the primary studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP), and the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) approach was applied to evaluate the findings.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe metasynthesis included 49 qualitative studies with 1,467 participants and led to the development of 22 themes and 85 subthemes. Mental pain was defined by five phenomenal features: unpleasant, immediate, identity-disrupting, invisible, and often perceived as worse than physical pain. It is also accompanied by unspecific psychological and physical manifestations. The emergence of mental pain can be conceptualized as a signal of a threatened sense of self in response to bodily, psychological, existential, or social adversity. Confidence in the findings was moderate due to methodological and reporting limitations.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nA clearer understanding of mental pain may enhance clinical practice by helping clinicians better identify, understand, and respond to this form of suffering.","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":"103 1","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":17.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548567","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Mental pain-a pain not primarily felt in the body-is a predictor of suicide and is often described as one of the most distressing aspects of depression. However, the absence of a clear definition hampers both research and clinical practice. This metasynthesis aims to characterize the lived experience of mental pain to inform the future development of a definition.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science to identify qualitative studies reporting first-person accounts of mental pain. Thematic synthesis was used to generate descriptive and analytical themes, drawing on semantic, clinical, and phenomenological insights. The quality of the primary studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP), and the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) approach was applied to evaluate the findings.
RESULTS
The metasynthesis included 49 qualitative studies with 1,467 participants and led to the development of 22 themes and 85 subthemes. Mental pain was defined by five phenomenal features: unpleasant, immediate, identity-disrupting, invisible, and often perceived as worse than physical pain. It is also accompanied by unspecific psychological and physical manifestations. The emergence of mental pain can be conceptualized as a signal of a threatened sense of self in response to bodily, psychological, existential, or social adversity. Confidence in the findings was moderate due to methodological and reporting limitations.
CONCLUSION
A clearer understanding of mental pain may enhance clinical practice by helping clinicians better identify, understand, and respond to this form of suffering.
期刊介绍:
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics is a reputable journal that has been published since 1953. Over the years, it has gained recognition for its independence, originality, and methodological rigor. The journal has been at the forefront of research in psychosomatic medicine, psychotherapy research, and psychopharmacology, and has contributed to the development of new lines of research in these areas. It is now ranked among the world's most cited journals in the field.
As the official journal of the International College of Psychosomatic Medicine and the World Federation for Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics serves as a platform for discussing current and controversial issues and showcasing innovations in assessment and treatment. It offers a unique forum for cutting-edge thinking at the intersection of medical and behavioral sciences, catering to both practicing clinicians and researchers.
The journal is indexed in various databases and platforms such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Previews, Google Scholar, Academic Search, and Health Research Premium Collection, among others.