Jade Chaker,Eva Gorrochategui Matas,Cécile Chevrier,Mario Campone,Jean-Sébastien Frenel,Frédéric Bigot,Vincent Bessonneau,Arthur David
{"title":"Blood Sample Preparation for Human Chemical Exposomics: Insights from Large-Scale Applications.","authors":"Jade Chaker,Eva Gorrochategui Matas,Cécile Chevrier,Mario Campone,Jean-Sébastien Frenel,Frédéric Bigot,Vincent Bessonneau,Arthur David","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.5c01686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) enables profiling of hundreds of externally derived chemicals and their metabolites in human biofluids to capture the internal chemical exposome. Nevertheless, developing sensitive and robust high-throughput methodologies to scale up exposomics remains challenging. We compared two validated sample preparation methods (SPMs) based on protein precipitation (PPT) and PPT combined with phospholipid removal (PLR) in two cohorts using blood plasma (n = 109) and serum (n = 75) to assess their impact on LC-HRMS repeatability and chemical coverage. Additional filtration on PLR plates allowed the injection of extracts twice concentrated without affecting LC-HRMS repeatability. The comparison of chemical coverage between SPMs was then assessed using 184 compounds (including a large variety of exogenous chemicals) annotated with a suspect screening strategy. Most chemicals (78-86%) were detected with both SPMs, but a substantial fraction showed preferential (>2-fold, 37-50%) or exclusive (14-22%) detection with one SPM, reflecting differences in matrix effects and/or recoveries. Low-abundance chemicals were more sensitive to the choice of SPM, though no predictive trends related to physicochemical properties emerged, likely due to higher analytical uncertainty. Overall, both SPMs provided acceptable chemical coverage for large-scale exposomics. Nonetheless, the compound-dependent nature of detection highlights the value of applying complementary SPMs when feasible.","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c01686","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) enables profiling of hundreds of externally derived chemicals and their metabolites in human biofluids to capture the internal chemical exposome. Nevertheless, developing sensitive and robust high-throughput methodologies to scale up exposomics remains challenging. We compared two validated sample preparation methods (SPMs) based on protein precipitation (PPT) and PPT combined with phospholipid removal (PLR) in two cohorts using blood plasma (n = 109) and serum (n = 75) to assess their impact on LC-HRMS repeatability and chemical coverage. Additional filtration on PLR plates allowed the injection of extracts twice concentrated without affecting LC-HRMS repeatability. The comparison of chemical coverage between SPMs was then assessed using 184 compounds (including a large variety of exogenous chemicals) annotated with a suspect screening strategy. Most chemicals (78-86%) were detected with both SPMs, but a substantial fraction showed preferential (>2-fold, 37-50%) or exclusive (14-22%) detection with one SPM, reflecting differences in matrix effects and/or recoveries. Low-abundance chemicals were more sensitive to the choice of SPM, though no predictive trends related to physicochemical properties emerged, likely due to higher analytical uncertainty. Overall, both SPMs provided acceptable chemical coverage for large-scale exposomics. Nonetheless, the compound-dependent nature of detection highlights the value of applying complementary SPMs when feasible.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences.
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.