Blood Sample Preparation for Human Chemical Exposomics: Insights from Large-Scale Applications.

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Jade Chaker,Eva Gorrochategui Matas,Cécile Chevrier,Mario Campone,Jean-Sébastien Frenel,Frédéric Bigot,Vincent Bessonneau,Arthur David
{"title":"Blood Sample Preparation for Human Chemical Exposomics: Insights from Large-Scale Applications.","authors":"Jade Chaker,Eva Gorrochategui Matas,Cécile Chevrier,Mario Campone,Jean-Sébastien Frenel,Frédéric Bigot,Vincent Bessonneau,Arthur David","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.5c01686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) enables profiling of hundreds of externally derived chemicals and their metabolites in human biofluids to capture the internal chemical exposome. Nevertheless, developing sensitive and robust high-throughput methodologies to scale up exposomics remains challenging. We compared two validated sample preparation methods (SPMs) based on protein precipitation (PPT) and PPT combined with phospholipid removal (PLR) in two cohorts using blood plasma (n = 109) and serum (n = 75) to assess their impact on LC-HRMS repeatability and chemical coverage. Additional filtration on PLR plates allowed the injection of extracts twice concentrated without affecting LC-HRMS repeatability. The comparison of chemical coverage between SPMs was then assessed using 184 compounds (including a large variety of exogenous chemicals) annotated with a suspect screening strategy. Most chemicals (78-86%) were detected with both SPMs, but a substantial fraction showed preferential (>2-fold, 37-50%) or exclusive (14-22%) detection with one SPM, reflecting differences in matrix effects and/or recoveries. Low-abundance chemicals were more sensitive to the choice of SPM, though no predictive trends related to physicochemical properties emerged, likely due to higher analytical uncertainty. Overall, both SPMs provided acceptable chemical coverage for large-scale exposomics. Nonetheless, the compound-dependent nature of detection highlights the value of applying complementary SPMs when feasible.","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c01686","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) enables profiling of hundreds of externally derived chemicals and their metabolites in human biofluids to capture the internal chemical exposome. Nevertheless, developing sensitive and robust high-throughput methodologies to scale up exposomics remains challenging. We compared two validated sample preparation methods (SPMs) based on protein precipitation (PPT) and PPT combined with phospholipid removal (PLR) in two cohorts using blood plasma (n = 109) and serum (n = 75) to assess their impact on LC-HRMS repeatability and chemical coverage. Additional filtration on PLR plates allowed the injection of extracts twice concentrated without affecting LC-HRMS repeatability. The comparison of chemical coverage between SPMs was then assessed using 184 compounds (including a large variety of exogenous chemicals) annotated with a suspect screening strategy. Most chemicals (78-86%) were detected with both SPMs, but a substantial fraction showed preferential (>2-fold, 37-50%) or exclusive (14-22%) detection with one SPM, reflecting differences in matrix effects and/or recoveries. Low-abundance chemicals were more sensitive to the choice of SPM, though no predictive trends related to physicochemical properties emerged, likely due to higher analytical uncertainty. Overall, both SPMs provided acceptable chemical coverage for large-scale exposomics. Nonetheless, the compound-dependent nature of detection highlights the value of applying complementary SPMs when feasible.
人体化学暴露组学的血液样品制备:大规模应用的见解。
液相色谱-高分辨率质谱法(LC-HRMS)能够分析人体生物体液中数百种外部来源的化学物质及其代谢物,以捕获内部化学暴露物。然而,开发敏感和稳健的高通量方法来扩大暴露组学仍然具有挑战性。我们在血浆(n = 109)和血清(n = 75)两个队列中比较了两种有效的基于蛋白质沉淀(PPT)和PPT联合磷脂去除(PLR)的样品制备方法(SPMs),以评估它们对LC-HRMS重复性和化学覆盖的影响。在PLR板上进行额外过滤,允许两次浓缩的提取物注射,而不影响LC-HRMS的重复性。然后使用带有可疑筛选策略的184种化合物(包括多种外源化学物质)来评估SPMs之间的化学覆盖比较。大多数化学物质(78-86%)被两种SPM检测到,但相当一部分化学物质被一种SPM优先(37-50%)或完全(14-22%)检测到,这反映了基质效应和/或回收率的差异。低丰度的化学物质对SPM的选择更敏感,尽管没有出现与物理化学性质相关的预测趋势,可能是由于较高的分析不确定性。总的来说,两种SPMs都为大规模暴露学提供了可接受的化学覆盖。尽管如此,检测的化合物依赖性质强调了在可行的情况下应用互补SPMs的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信