Soil Physics‐Informed Neural Networks to Estimate Bimodal Soil Hydraulic Properties

IF 5 1区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jieliang Zhou, Yunquan Wang, Pengfei Qi, Rui Ma, Harry Vereecken, Budiman Minasny, Yonggen Zhang
{"title":"Soil Physics‐Informed Neural Networks to Estimate Bimodal Soil Hydraulic Properties","authors":"Jieliang Zhou, Yunquan Wang, Pengfei Qi, Rui Ma, Harry Vereecken, Budiman Minasny, Yonggen Zhang","doi":"10.1029/2024wr039337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pedotransfer functions (PTFs) are widely used to estimate soil hydraulic properties (SHPs) from easily measurable soil properties. However, most existing PTFs are based on unimodal hydraulic models, which fail to capture the bimodal behavior of hydraulic properties caused by soil structure. In this study, we developed new PTFs using two bimodal hydraulic models and introduced a soil physics–informed neural network to embed these models into the training process. The results showed that the new PTFs effectively represented bimodality in hydraulic conductivity curves, achieving a root mean square error of 0.531(<jats:italic>K</jats:italic> in cm/d) on the test set, compared with 0.626 for unimodal models. They also improved predictions of soil water retention curves but struggled with bimodal cases for some samples, likely due to the limited number of bimodal retention curves in the training data set. Evaluation on an independent data set showed that the error for hydraulic conductivity predicted by the new functions was about one‐third that of conventional approaches. In addition, the proposed soil physics–informed neural network, which directly optimizes SHPs, outperformed the conventional approaches that optimize fitted model parameters. We also found that whether water retention and hydraulic conductivity are optimized separately or simultaneously has a large effect on performance. Nonetheless, the lack of explicit soil structure information in the input data, along with limited measurements near saturation, continues to constrain accuracy. This emphasizes the need to develop a more comprehensive soil hydraulic database.","PeriodicalId":23799,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources Research","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr039337","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pedotransfer functions (PTFs) are widely used to estimate soil hydraulic properties (SHPs) from easily measurable soil properties. However, most existing PTFs are based on unimodal hydraulic models, which fail to capture the bimodal behavior of hydraulic properties caused by soil structure. In this study, we developed new PTFs using two bimodal hydraulic models and introduced a soil physics–informed neural network to embed these models into the training process. The results showed that the new PTFs effectively represented bimodality in hydraulic conductivity curves, achieving a root mean square error of 0.531(K in cm/d) on the test set, compared with 0.626 for unimodal models. They also improved predictions of soil water retention curves but struggled with bimodal cases for some samples, likely due to the limited number of bimodal retention curves in the training data set. Evaluation on an independent data set showed that the error for hydraulic conductivity predicted by the new functions was about one‐third that of conventional approaches. In addition, the proposed soil physics–informed neural network, which directly optimizes SHPs, outperformed the conventional approaches that optimize fitted model parameters. We also found that whether water retention and hydraulic conductivity are optimized separately or simultaneously has a large effect on performance. Nonetheless, the lack of explicit soil structure information in the input data, along with limited measurements near saturation, continues to constrain accuracy. This emphasizes the need to develop a more comprehensive soil hydraulic database.
土壤物理-信息神经网络估计双峰土壤水力特性
土壤传递函数(PTFs)被广泛用于从易于测量的土壤性质中估计土壤水力特性(SHPs)。然而,大多数现有的ptf都是基于单峰水力模型,无法捕捉到由土壤结构引起的水力特性的双峰行为。在这项研究中,我们使用两个双峰水力模型开发了新的ptf,并引入了一个土壤物理信息神经网络,将这些模型嵌入到训练过程中。结果表明,新的ptf有效地代表了水力导率曲线的双峰性,在测试集上的均方根误差为0.531(K in cm/d),而单峰模型的均方根误差为0.626。他们还改进了对土壤水分保持曲线的预测,但在一些样本的双峰情况下,可能是由于训练数据集中双峰保持曲线的数量有限。对独立数据集的评估表明,新函数预测的水力导电性误差约为传统方法的三分之一。此外,所提出的土壤物理信息神经网络直接优化shp,优于优化拟合模型参数的传统方法。我们还发现,无论是单独优化还是同时优化保水性和导水性对性能都有很大的影响。然而,在输入数据中缺乏明确的土壤结构信息,以及在饱和附近的有限测量,继续限制精度。这强调需要发展一个更全面的土壤水力数据库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Resources Research
Water Resources Research 环境科学-湖沼学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信