Long-Term effects of Progressive High-Speed Resistance Exercise in Older Women with Low Muscle Strength. A Randomized Clinical Trial

Luis Polo-Ferrero, Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft, Javier Vallejo-Martín, Ana Silvia Puente-González, María Carmen Sánchez-Sánchez, Fausto J Barbero-Iglesias, Roberto Méndez-Sánchez
{"title":"Long-Term effects of Progressive High-Speed Resistance Exercise in Older Women with Low Muscle Strength. A Randomized Clinical Trial","authors":"Luis Polo-Ferrero, Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft, Javier Vallejo-Martín, Ana Silvia Puente-González, María Carmen Sánchez-Sánchez, Fausto J Barbero-Iglesias, Roberto Méndez-Sánchez","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Low muscle strength and sarcopenia are strong predictors of disability. Although multicomponent training (MT) is commonly recommended, its long-term effects remain unclear, and evidence on High-Speed Resistance Training (H-RT) in older women is limited. Methods This double-blind randomized trial evaluated the effects of a 32-week intervention, with RT (weeks 1–11) progressing to H-RT (weeks 12–32) vs MT, on muscle strength, body composition, and functional performance. A total of 120 women aged ≥65 years (mean age: 77.0 ± 6.8 years) with low muscle strength (diagnosed with probable sarcopenia according to EWGSOP2) were randomized into H-RT, MT, or a non-exercise control group (CG). Results Both exercise modalities improved lower-limb physical performance, as assessed by the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test, compared to women who did not exercise (p < 0.001), with no significant differences between H-RT and MT (p = 0.127) (H-RT: -3.2 ± 2.5 s; MT: -2.6 ± 2.5 s vs CG: -0.8 ± 2.1 s). Functional and body composition improvements were seen in both groups. H-RT led to greater improvements in the Timed Up & Go Test (-0.9 ± 1.9 s; p = 0.007) and waist circumference (-4.5 ± 5.1 cm; p = 0.010), while MT showed better results in aerobic capacity (Two-minute step test: +19.9 ± 17.2 steps; p = 0.044). Conclusions H-RT is an effective alternative to MT for improving strength, performance, and body composition in older women, with specific benefits. Further studies should confirm its role in preserving intrinsic capacity and preventing sarcopenic obesity.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Low muscle strength and sarcopenia are strong predictors of disability. Although multicomponent training (MT) is commonly recommended, its long-term effects remain unclear, and evidence on High-Speed Resistance Training (H-RT) in older women is limited. Methods This double-blind randomized trial evaluated the effects of a 32-week intervention, with RT (weeks 1–11) progressing to H-RT (weeks 12–32) vs MT, on muscle strength, body composition, and functional performance. A total of 120 women aged ≥65 years (mean age: 77.0 ± 6.8 years) with low muscle strength (diagnosed with probable sarcopenia according to EWGSOP2) were randomized into H-RT, MT, or a non-exercise control group (CG). Results Both exercise modalities improved lower-limb physical performance, as assessed by the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test, compared to women who did not exercise (p < 0.001), with no significant differences between H-RT and MT (p = 0.127) (H-RT: -3.2 ± 2.5 s; MT: -2.6 ± 2.5 s vs CG: -0.8 ± 2.1 s). Functional and body composition improvements were seen in both groups. H-RT led to greater improvements in the Timed Up & Go Test (-0.9 ± 1.9 s; p = 0.007) and waist circumference (-4.5 ± 5.1 cm; p = 0.010), while MT showed better results in aerobic capacity (Two-minute step test: +19.9 ± 17.2 steps; p = 0.044). Conclusions H-RT is an effective alternative to MT for improving strength, performance, and body composition in older women, with specific benefits. Further studies should confirm its role in preserving intrinsic capacity and preventing sarcopenic obesity.
渐进式高速阻力运动对老年女性低肌力的长期影响。一项随机临床试验
背景:低肌力和肌肉减少症是残疾的有力预测因子。虽然多组分训练(MT)通常被推荐,但其长期效果尚不清楚,并且老年妇女的高速阻力训练(H-RT)的证据有限。该双盲随机试验评估了32周干预的效果,从RT(1-11周)进展到H-RT(12-32周)vs MT,对肌肉力量、身体成分和功能表现的影响。共有120名年龄≥65岁(平均年龄:77.0±6.8岁)、肌肉力量低(根据EWGSOP2诊断为可能的肌肉减少症)的女性被随机分为H-RT、MT或非运动对照组(CG)。结果:与不运动的女性相比,两种运动方式都能改善下肢身体机能(p < 0.001), H-RT和MT之间无显著差异(p = 0.127) (H-RT: -3.2±2.5 s; MT: -2.6±2.5 s vs CG: -0.8±2.1 s)。两组患者的功能和身体成分均有所改善。H-RT在Timed Up &; Go Test(-0.9±1.9 s, p = 0.007)和腰围(-4.5±5.1 cm, p = 0.010)方面有较大改善,而MT在有氧能力方面有较好的效果(两分钟步数测试:+19.9±17.2步,p = 0.044)。结论:H-RT是MT的有效替代方案,可改善老年妇女的力量、表现和身体成分,并具有特定的益处。进一步的研究应证实其在保持内在能力和预防肌肉减少性肥胖方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信