Predicting pregnancy outcomes in IVF cycles: a systematic review and diagnostic meta- analysis of artificial intelligence in embryo assessment.

IF 1.9 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ataei Mina, Masumeh Younesi, Tahereh Doohandeh, Soheila Darzi, Negar Ajabi Ardehjani, Samaneh Sheibani, Hossein Hosseinirad, Rohollah Valizadeh
{"title":"Predicting pregnancy outcomes in IVF cycles: a systematic review and diagnostic meta- analysis of artificial intelligence in embryo assessment.","authors":"Ataei Mina, Masumeh Younesi, Tahereh Doohandeh, Soheila Darzi, Negar Ajabi Ardehjani, Samaneh Sheibani, Hossein Hosseinirad, Rohollah Valizadeh","doi":"10.1186/s40834-025-00400-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Embryo selection remains a key challenge in in vitro fertilization (IVF), as many morphologically \"normal\" embryos fail to implant. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a promising tool for improving embryo assessment by providing more objective and accurate predictions of pregnancy outcomes. This study aims to systematically review and conduct a diagnostic meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of AI-based tools in embryo selection for predicting pregnancy outcomes in IVF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, searching Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed. Original research articles evaluating AI's diagnostic accuracy in embryo selection were included, while duplicates, non-peer-reviewed papers, abstracts, and conference proceedings were excluded. Data on sample sizes, AI tools, and diagnostic metrics were extracted, with quality assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AI-based embryo selection methods showed strong diagnostic performance, with pooled sensitivity of 0.69 and specificity of 0.62 in predicting implantation success. The positive likelihood ratio was 1.84 and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.5. The area under the curve reached 0.7, indicating high overall accuracy. The Life Whisperer AI model achieved 64.3% accuracy in predicting clinical pregnancy, while the FiTTE system, which integrates blastocyst images with clinical data, improved prediction accuracy to 65.2% with an AUC of 0.7.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI offers a promising advancement in embryo selection for IVF, with the potential to enhance clinical outcomes and improve decision-making. Future studies should focus on refining these models to achieve the ultimate goal of a healthy live birth by developing more sophisticated algorithms and validating them with larger, diverse datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":93956,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476623/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-025-00400-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Embryo selection remains a key challenge in in vitro fertilization (IVF), as many morphologically "normal" embryos fail to implant. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a promising tool for improving embryo assessment by providing more objective and accurate predictions of pregnancy outcomes. This study aims to systematically review and conduct a diagnostic meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of AI-based tools in embryo selection for predicting pregnancy outcomes in IVF.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, searching Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed. Original research articles evaluating AI's diagnostic accuracy in embryo selection were included, while duplicates, non-peer-reviewed papers, abstracts, and conference proceedings were excluded. Data on sample sizes, AI tools, and diagnostic metrics were extracted, with quality assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.

Results: AI-based embryo selection methods showed strong diagnostic performance, with pooled sensitivity of 0.69 and specificity of 0.62 in predicting implantation success. The positive likelihood ratio was 1.84 and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.5. The area under the curve reached 0.7, indicating high overall accuracy. The Life Whisperer AI model achieved 64.3% accuracy in predicting clinical pregnancy, while the FiTTE system, which integrates blastocyst images with clinical data, improved prediction accuracy to 65.2% with an AUC of 0.7.

Conclusion: AI offers a promising advancement in embryo selection for IVF, with the potential to enhance clinical outcomes and improve decision-making. Future studies should focus on refining these models to achieve the ultimate goal of a healthy live birth by developing more sophisticated algorithms and validating them with larger, diverse datasets.

预测IVF周期的妊娠结局:人工智能在胚胎评估中的系统回顾和诊断荟萃分析。
胚胎选择仍然是体外受精(IVF)的一个关键挑战,因为许多形态“正常”的胚胎无法植入。人工智能(AI)通过提供更客观和准确的怀孕结果预测,为改善胚胎评估提供了一个有前途的工具。本研究旨在系统回顾并进行诊断荟萃分析,以评估基于人工智能的工具在体外受精胚胎选择中预测妊娠结局的有效性。方法:我们按照PRISMA指南,检索Web of Science, Scopus和PubMed进行了系统综述。评估人工智能在胚胎选择中的诊断准确性的原创研究文章被纳入,而重复的、未经同行评审的论文、摘要和会议记录被排除在外。提取样本量、人工智能工具和诊断指标的数据,并使用QUADAS-2工具评估质量。结果:基于人工智能的胚胎选择方法具有较强的诊断能力,预测着床成功的总敏感性为0.69,特异性为0.62。阳性似然比为1.84,阴性似然比为0.5。曲线下面积达到0.7,整体精度较高。Life Whisperer人工智能模型对临床妊娠的预测准确率达到64.3%,而结合囊胚图像和临床数据的FiTTE系统将预测准确率提高到65.2%,AUC为0.7。结论:人工智能在体外受精胚胎选择方面有很大的进步,有可能提高临床结果和改善决策。未来的研究应该专注于完善这些模型,通过开发更复杂的算法,并用更大、更多样化的数据集来验证它们,以实现健康活产的最终目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信