Person-centered maternity care and its associated factors during childbirth at selected public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.4 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2025-09-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2025.1513808
Arsema Gebreyesus, Agumasie Semahegn, Fikru Tebeje, Arega Abebe Lonsako, Sagni Girma
{"title":"Person-centered maternity care and its associated factors during childbirth at selected public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Arsema Gebreyesus, Agumasie Semahegn, Fikru Tebeje, Arega Abebe Lonsako, Sagni Girma","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2025.1513808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternal mortality has remained a major public health issue globally. Although there has been substantial reduction in maternal mortality, Ethiopia is still one of the highest burden countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Person-centered maternity care plays a key role in ending preventable maternal mortality. Nevertheless, little is known about the status of person-centered maternity care during facility-based childbirth in eastern Ethiopia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the status of person-centered maternity care and its associated factors during childbirth at selected public hospitals in eastern Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We had conducted a facility-based cross-sectional study at selected public hospitals in eastern Ethiopia from May 16 to June 17, 2022. A total of 420 postpartum women, selected by a systematic random sampling technique, were included in the study. We had collected our data by face-to-face interview using a pretested structured questionnaire. Then, the data were entered into EpiData 4.6 and exported to SPSS version 26 for cleaning and analysis. We applied linear regression analyses to determine the associations between dependent and independent variables. The association was reported using a β coefficient with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and a <i>p</i>-value ≤0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage mean score of person-centered maternity care was 68.1 (CI: 59.94, 62.66), SD (±14.1). From the subscales of person-centered maternity care, the percentage mean score of dignity and respect was 80.6%, communication and autonomy 61.1%, and 67.3% for supportive care. Women who'd had antenatal care (ANC) follow-up (<i>β</i> = 5.66, 95% CI: 2.79, 8.53) and women who gave birth to a live newborn (<i>β</i> = 7.59, 95% CI: 3.97, 11.20) had a positive association with person-centered maternity care. However, women who had experienced childbirth complications (<i>β</i> = -7.01, 95% CI: -9.88, -4.13) and those who had a hospital stay of more than two days (<i>β</i> = -4.08, 95% CI: -6.79, -1.38) were negatively associated with person-centered maternity care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study revealed that the mean person-centered maternity care score of the participants was significantly higher than in previous studies. Women who had antenatal care follow-up, experienced complications during childbirth, gave birth to a live newborn, and had a hospital stay of more than two days were significantly associated with person-centered maternity care. Therefore, we strongly concluded that strengthening antenatal care utilization and early detection and appropriate management of childbirth and pregnancy complications would greatly improve person-centered maternity care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"6 ","pages":"1513808"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1513808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maternal mortality has remained a major public health issue globally. Although there has been substantial reduction in maternal mortality, Ethiopia is still one of the highest burden countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Person-centered maternity care plays a key role in ending preventable maternal mortality. Nevertheless, little is known about the status of person-centered maternity care during facility-based childbirth in eastern Ethiopia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the status of person-centered maternity care and its associated factors during childbirth at selected public hospitals in eastern Ethiopia.

Methods: We had conducted a facility-based cross-sectional study at selected public hospitals in eastern Ethiopia from May 16 to June 17, 2022. A total of 420 postpartum women, selected by a systematic random sampling technique, were included in the study. We had collected our data by face-to-face interview using a pretested structured questionnaire. Then, the data were entered into EpiData 4.6 and exported to SPSS version 26 for cleaning and analysis. We applied linear regression analyses to determine the associations between dependent and independent variables. The association was reported using a β coefficient with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and a p-value ≤0.05.

Results: The percentage mean score of person-centered maternity care was 68.1 (CI: 59.94, 62.66), SD (±14.1). From the subscales of person-centered maternity care, the percentage mean score of dignity and respect was 80.6%, communication and autonomy 61.1%, and 67.3% for supportive care. Women who'd had antenatal care (ANC) follow-up (β = 5.66, 95% CI: 2.79, 8.53) and women who gave birth to a live newborn (β = 7.59, 95% CI: 3.97, 11.20) had a positive association with person-centered maternity care. However, women who had experienced childbirth complications (β = -7.01, 95% CI: -9.88, -4.13) and those who had a hospital stay of more than two days (β = -4.08, 95% CI: -6.79, -1.38) were negatively associated with person-centered maternity care.

Conclusion: Our study revealed that the mean person-centered maternity care score of the participants was significantly higher than in previous studies. Women who had antenatal care follow-up, experienced complications during childbirth, gave birth to a live newborn, and had a hospital stay of more than two days were significantly associated with person-centered maternity care. Therefore, we strongly concluded that strengthening antenatal care utilization and early detection and appropriate management of childbirth and pregnancy complications would greatly improve person-centered maternity care.

埃塞俄比亚东部选定公立医院分娩期间以人为中心的产妇护理及其相关因素:一项横断面研究
背景:孕产妇死亡率仍然是全球一个主要的公共卫生问题。尽管孕产妇死亡率大幅下降,埃塞俄比亚仍然是撒哈拉以南非洲负担最重的国家之一。以人为本的孕产妇保健在消除可预防的孕产妇死亡方面发挥着关键作用。然而,在埃塞俄比亚东部的设施分娩中,人们对以人为本的产妇护理状况知之甚少。因此,本研究的目的是评估在埃塞俄比亚东部选定的公立医院分娩期间以人为本的产妇护理状况及其相关因素。方法:我们于2022年5月16日至6月17日在埃塞俄比亚东部选定的公立医院进行了一项基于设施的横断面研究。采用系统随机抽样的方法,对420名产后妇女进行了研究。我们使用预先测试的结构化问卷,通过面对面访谈收集数据。然后将数据输入EpiData 4.6,导出到SPSS 26进行清理和分析。我们应用线性回归分析来确定因变量和自变量之间的关联。用95%置信区间(CI)和p值≤0.05的β系数报道该相关性。结果:以人为中心的产妇护理百分比平均得分为68.1分(CI: 59.94, 62.66), SD(±14.1)。在以人为本的产科护理亚量表中,尊严和尊重的百分比平均值为80.6%,沟通和自主的百分比平均值为61.1%,支持护理的百分比平均值为67.3%。接受过产前护理(ANC)随访的妇女(β = 5.66, 95% CI: 2.79, 8.53)和活产新生儿的妇女(β = 7.59, 95% CI: 3.97, 11.20)与以人为中心的产科护理呈正相关。然而,经历过分娩并发症的妇女(β = -7.01, 95% CI: -9.88, -4.13)和住院时间超过两天的妇女(β = -4.08, 95% CI: -6.79, -1.38)与以人为中心的产科护理呈负相关。结论:本研究发现,参与者的平均以人为中心的产妇护理得分显著高于以往的研究。接受产前护理随访、分娩期间出现并发症、产下活婴、住院时间超过两天的妇女与以人为本的产科护理显著相关。因此,我们强烈认为,加强产前保健利用,早期发现和适当管理分娩和妊娠并发症,将大大提高以人为本的孕产妇保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信