Büşra Ecer , Abdullah Sivrikaya , Gökhan Ecer , Serdar Göktaş , Mehmet Yıldız , Mehmet Balasar , Ali Ünlü
{"title":"Angiogenesis biomarkers in prostate cancer: Unlocking new avenues for prognosis and diagnosis","authors":"Büşra Ecer , Abdullah Sivrikaya , Gökhan Ecer , Serdar Göktaş , Mehmet Yıldız , Mehmet Balasar , Ali Ünlü","doi":"10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2025.101253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the levels of angiogenesis-related biomarkers, including Thrombospondin-1 (TSP1), Endostatin, Osteopontin, and Tumstatin, in prostate cancer patients and their relationship with tumor spread and clinical parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective study included 92 participants divided into three groups: 33 prostate cancer patients, 29 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and 30 healthy controls. Biomarker levels were analyzed and compared among the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Osteopontin levels were significantly higher in the prostate cancer group (108.5 ng/mL) compared to the BPH (66.02 ng/mL) and control groups (56.5 ng/mL). TSP1 levels were lower in prostate cancer group (16.3 ng/mL) than in the BPH (25.3 ng/mL) and control groups (21.5 ng/mL). Similarly, Endostatin levels were reduced in the prostate cancer group (146.3 ng/mL) compared to the BPH (163.3 ng/mL) and control groups (166.2 ng/mL). No significant differences in Tumstatin levels were observed among the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Elevated Osteopontin levels correlate with higher Gleason scores and metastatic potential, while lower TSP1 and Endostatin levels are associated with advanced tumor progression. These biomarkers may serve as indicators of prognosis in prostate cancer, though larger studies are required for validation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55193,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Cancer","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 101253"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147027225000807","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the levels of angiogenesis-related biomarkers, including Thrombospondin-1 (TSP1), Endostatin, Osteopontin, and Tumstatin, in prostate cancer patients and their relationship with tumor spread and clinical parameters.
Methods
This prospective study included 92 participants divided into three groups: 33 prostate cancer patients, 29 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and 30 healthy controls. Biomarker levels were analyzed and compared among the groups.
Results
Osteopontin levels were significantly higher in the prostate cancer group (108.5 ng/mL) compared to the BPH (66.02 ng/mL) and control groups (56.5 ng/mL). TSP1 levels were lower in prostate cancer group (16.3 ng/mL) than in the BPH (25.3 ng/mL) and control groups (21.5 ng/mL). Similarly, Endostatin levels were reduced in the prostate cancer group (146.3 ng/mL) compared to the BPH (163.3 ng/mL) and control groups (166.2 ng/mL). No significant differences in Tumstatin levels were observed among the groups.
Conclusions
Elevated Osteopontin levels correlate with higher Gleason scores and metastatic potential, while lower TSP1 and Endostatin levels are associated with advanced tumor progression. These biomarkers may serve as indicators of prognosis in prostate cancer, though larger studies are required for validation.
期刊介绍:
Current Problems in Cancer seeks to promote and disseminate innovative, transformative, and impactful data on patient-oriented cancer research and clinical care. Specifically, the journal''s scope is focused on reporting the results of well-designed cancer studies that influence/alter practice or identify new directions in clinical cancer research. These studies can include novel therapeutic approaches, new strategies for early diagnosis, cancer clinical trials, and supportive care, among others. Papers that focus solely on laboratory-based or basic science research are discouraged. The journal''s format also allows, on occasion, for a multi-faceted overview of a single topic via a curated selection of review articles, while also offering articles that present dynamic material that influences the oncology field.