Progression of lumbar disc degeneration: A 14-year follow-up study examining Pfirrmann grading and its individual disc components.

IF 1 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Acta radiologica open Pub Date : 2025-09-25 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1177/20584601251379482
Niko Murto, Teija Lund, Hannu Kautiainen, Katariina Luoma, Liisa Kerttula
{"title":"Progression of lumbar disc degeneration: A 14-year follow-up study examining Pfirrmann grading and its individual disc components.","authors":"Niko Murto, Teija Lund, Hannu Kautiainen, Katariina Luoma, Liisa Kerttula","doi":"10.1177/20584601251379482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lumbar disc degeneration (LDD) is frequently evaluated using the Pfirrmann classification. While this composite grading system provides an overview of degeneration severity, it may oversimplify LDD by overlooking variability in individual disc components, reducing its effectiveness in longitudinal studies and constraining its applicability in artificial intelligence-based image analysis.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the 14-year progression of LDD using the Pfirrmann classification and its individual components, and to evaluate the potential of component-based analysis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>LDD was assessed using MRI in 19 males (95 discs) at ages 37 and 51 by two radiologists. Evaluations included Pfirrmann grading, quantitative nucleus pulposus (NP) signal intensity, and visual grading of NP inhomogeneity, annulus fibrosus (AF) border distinction, and disc height (DH). Analyses included longitudinal changes in LDD variables and correlations between Pfirrmann grading and disc components. To assess overall LDD, a summary score was calculated by summing individual disc grades.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pfirrmann grading correlated strongly with AF border distinction, moderately with NP signal intensity, and weakly with NP inhomogeneity and DH. Pfirrmann summary score (range 5-25) increased by 3 points over time. Variability was observed in the progression of individual disc component degeneration. While mean NP signal intensity significantly decreased, some discs exhibited increase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This longitudinal study highlights complexity of LDD and variability in disc component changes. While Pfirrmann classification captures overall degeneration, its limitations in detecting subtle variations in disc components suggest a need for more detailed assessments to enhance diagnostic precision and support the development of automated analysis tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":72063,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica open","volume":"14 9","pages":"20584601251379482"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12475308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20584601251379482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lumbar disc degeneration (LDD) is frequently evaluated using the Pfirrmann classification. While this composite grading system provides an overview of degeneration severity, it may oversimplify LDD by overlooking variability in individual disc components, reducing its effectiveness in longitudinal studies and constraining its applicability in artificial intelligence-based image analysis.

Purpose: To examine the 14-year progression of LDD using the Pfirrmann classification and its individual components, and to evaluate the potential of component-based analysis.

Material and methods: LDD was assessed using MRI in 19 males (95 discs) at ages 37 and 51 by two radiologists. Evaluations included Pfirrmann grading, quantitative nucleus pulposus (NP) signal intensity, and visual grading of NP inhomogeneity, annulus fibrosus (AF) border distinction, and disc height (DH). Analyses included longitudinal changes in LDD variables and correlations between Pfirrmann grading and disc components. To assess overall LDD, a summary score was calculated by summing individual disc grades.

Results: Pfirrmann grading correlated strongly with AF border distinction, moderately with NP signal intensity, and weakly with NP inhomogeneity and DH. Pfirrmann summary score (range 5-25) increased by 3 points over time. Variability was observed in the progression of individual disc component degeneration. While mean NP signal intensity significantly decreased, some discs exhibited increase.

Conclusion: This longitudinal study highlights complexity of LDD and variability in disc component changes. While Pfirrmann classification captures overall degeneration, its limitations in detecting subtle variations in disc components suggest a need for more detailed assessments to enhance diagnostic precision and support the development of automated analysis tools.

腰椎间盘退变的进展:一项检查Pfirrmann分级及其单个椎间盘组成的14年随访研究。
背景:腰椎间盘退变(LDD)经常使用Pfirrmann分类进行评估。虽然这种复合分级系统提供了退化严重程度的概述,但由于忽略了单个椎间盘组件的可变性,它可能过度简化了LDD,降低了其在纵向研究中的有效性,并限制了其在基于人工智能的图像分析中的适用性。目的:使用Pfirrmann分类及其单个成分来检查LDD的14年进展,并评估基于成分的分析的潜力。材料和方法:两名放射科医生对19名37岁和51岁的男性(95个椎间盘)进行MRI评估。评估包括Pfirrmann分级、定量髓核(NP)信号强度、NP不均匀性、纤维环(AF)边界区分和椎间盘高度(DH)的视觉分级。分析包括LDD变量的纵向变化和Pfirrmann分级与椎间盘成分之间的相关性。为了评估整体LDD,通过将单个椎间盘评分相加来计算总结分数。结果:Pfirrmann分级与AF边界区分相关性强,与NP信号强度相关性中等,与NP不均匀性和DH相关性弱。Pfirrmann总结分数(范围5-25)随时间增加3分。在个别椎间盘退变的进展中观察到变异性。平均NP信号强度显著降低,部分盘部信号强度增加。结论:这项纵向研究突出了LDD的复杂性和椎间盘组成改变的可变性。虽然Pfirrmann分类捕获了整体退变,但其在检测椎间盘成分细微变化方面的局限性表明,需要更详细的评估来提高诊断精度,并支持自动化分析工具的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信