Comparison of Outcomes Between Free Ileocolonic and Tube-Shaped ALT Fasciocutaneous Flaps in Total Hypopharyngeal Defect Reconstruction.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Jian-Xun Chen, Ta-I Wang, Shane D Morrison, Mei-Chen Lin, Pin-Keng Shih
{"title":"Comparison of Outcomes Between Free Ileocolonic and Tube-Shaped ALT Fasciocutaneous Flaps in Total Hypopharyngeal Defect Reconstruction.","authors":"Jian-Xun Chen, Ta-I Wang, Shane D Morrison, Mei-Chen Lin, Pin-Keng Shih","doi":"10.1002/hed.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compares the outcomes of free ileocolonic and tube-shaped anterolateral thigh (ALT) fasciocutaneous flaps in reconstructing total hypopharyngeal defects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 76 patients who underwent reconstruction with either an ileocolonic flap (n = 20) or a tube-shaped ALT flap (n = 56) between 2011 and 2021. Primary outcomes included dietary tolerance at 1 and 3 years, pharyngocutaneous fistula rates, and survival. Statistical analyses assessed group differences in complications and dietary restrictions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ileocolonic flap group demonstrated superior dietary outcomes at 1 and 3 years (90% vs. 62.5% and 90% vs. 51.4%, respectively) but had a higher fistula rate (25% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.048). No significant differences in survival were observed between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ileocolonic flap offers better long-term dietary outcomes despite higher early fistula rates. Further research is recommended to optimize flap selection for hypopharyngeal reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":55072,"journal":{"name":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.70051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study compares the outcomes of free ileocolonic and tube-shaped anterolateral thigh (ALT) fasciocutaneous flaps in reconstructing total hypopharyngeal defects.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 76 patients who underwent reconstruction with either an ileocolonic flap (n = 20) or a tube-shaped ALT flap (n = 56) between 2011 and 2021. Primary outcomes included dietary tolerance at 1 and 3 years, pharyngocutaneous fistula rates, and survival. Statistical analyses assessed group differences in complications and dietary restrictions.

Results: The ileocolonic flap group demonstrated superior dietary outcomes at 1 and 3 years (90% vs. 62.5% and 90% vs. 51.4%, respectively) but had a higher fistula rate (25% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.048). No significant differences in survival were observed between the groups.

Conclusion: The ileocolonic flap offers better long-term dietary outcomes despite higher early fistula rates. Further research is recommended to optimize flap selection for hypopharyngeal reconstruction.

游离回结肠与管状ALT筋膜皮瓣在全下咽缺损重建中的效果比较。
目的:比较游离回结肠和管状股前外侧筋膜皮瓣重建全下咽缺损的效果。方法:回顾性分析2011年至2021年间76例采用回肠结肠皮瓣(n = 20)或管状ALT皮瓣(n = 56)重建的患者。主要结局包括1年和3年的饮食耐受性、咽皮瘘发生率和生存率。统计分析评估了并发症和饮食限制的组间差异。结果:回肠结肠皮瓣组在1年和3年表现出更好的饮食结果(分别为90%比62.5%和90%比51.4%),但瘘率更高(25%比7.1%,p = 0.048)。两组间生存率无显著差异。结论:尽管早期瘘管发生率较高,但回肠结肠皮瓣提供了更好的长期饮食结果。建议进一步研究优化下咽重建皮瓣的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
278
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Head & Neck is an international multidisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck. This area involves the overlapping interests and expertise of several surgical and medical specialties, including general surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, oral surgery, dermatology, ophthalmology, pathology, radiotherapy, medical oncology, and the corresponding basic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信