Long-term outcomes of accelerated partial breast irradiation with multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy versus whole breast irradiation: an 11-Year clinical practice follow-up study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Sara Garduño-Sánchez, María Isabel Villanego-Beltrán, Juan Gómez-Salgado, Javier Jaén-Olasolo
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of accelerated partial breast irradiation with multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy versus whole breast irradiation: an 11-Year clinical practice follow-up study.","authors":"Sara Garduño-Sánchez, María Isabel Villanego-Beltrán, Juan Gómez-Salgado, Javier Jaén-Olasolo","doi":"10.1007/s12094-025-04060-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the long-term outcomes of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy versus whole breast irradiation (WBI), in terms of late toxicity, cosmetic results, quality of life, and survival, in a real-world clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Updated analysis of two prospectively collected cohorts comprising 76 patients with stage I-II breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. Patients who underwent APBI met the GEC-ESTRO eligibility criteria. We assessed follow-up and additional analyses of late toxicity, quality of life (assessed using the validated QLQ-BR23 and S-BIS questionnaires), cosmetic outcomes (via Visual Analog Scale), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS), providing a more comprehensive evaluation of long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a median follow-up of 11 years, patient-reported quality of life remained significantly better in the APBI group, particularly in both physical and psychological domains, consistent with previous findings. No significant differences were observed in late clinical toxicity or cosmetic outcomes between groups. However, late mammographic findings showed a higher incidence of architectural distortion and tissue retraction in the APBI group, confirming earlier observations. The estimated 5- and 10-year OS rates were 94.7 and 81.1%, respectively. Corresponding DFS rates were 92.1% and 79.7%, with no statistically significant differences between treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With extended follow-up, our results reinforce that APBI using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy is a safe and effective alternative to WBI in selected patients, providing long-term tumor control and survival comparable to WBI, while offering improved quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-025-04060-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the long-term outcomes of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy versus whole breast irradiation (WBI), in terms of late toxicity, cosmetic results, quality of life, and survival, in a real-world clinical setting.

Methods: Updated analysis of two prospectively collected cohorts comprising 76 patients with stage I-II breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. Patients who underwent APBI met the GEC-ESTRO eligibility criteria. We assessed follow-up and additional analyses of late toxicity, quality of life (assessed using the validated QLQ-BR23 and S-BIS questionnaires), cosmetic outcomes (via Visual Analog Scale), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS), providing a more comprehensive evaluation of long-term outcomes.

Results: At a median follow-up of 11 years, patient-reported quality of life remained significantly better in the APBI group, particularly in both physical and psychological domains, consistent with previous findings. No significant differences were observed in late clinical toxicity or cosmetic outcomes between groups. However, late mammographic findings showed a higher incidence of architectural distortion and tissue retraction in the APBI group, confirming earlier observations. The estimated 5- and 10-year OS rates were 94.7 and 81.1%, respectively. Corresponding DFS rates were 92.1% and 79.7%, with no statistically significant differences between treatment groups.

Conclusion: With extended follow-up, our results reinforce that APBI using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy is a safe and effective alternative to WBI in selected patients, providing long-term tumor control and survival comparable to WBI, while offering improved quality of life.

多导管间质近距离加速部分乳房放疗与全乳房放疗的长期疗效:一项为期11年的临床实践随访研究
目的:在真实世界的临床环境中,比较多导管间质近距离加速部分乳房照射(APBI)与全乳房照射(WBI)在后期毒性、美容效果、生活质量和生存率方面的长期结果。方法:更新分析两个前瞻性收集的队列,包括76例I-II期乳腺癌患者,这些患者接受保乳手术和辅助放疗。接受APBI的患者符合GEC-ESTRO资格标准。我们评估了随访和后期毒性、生活质量(使用经过验证的QLQ-BR23和S-BIS问卷评估)、美容结果(通过视觉模拟量表评估)、总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)的附加分析,提供了更全面的长期预后评估。结果:在中位11年的随访中,APBI组患者报告的生活质量仍然明显更好,特别是在身体和心理领域,与先前的研究结果一致。两组之间的晚期临床毒性或美容结果无显著差异。然而,晚期乳房x线检查结果显示APBI组的建筑扭曲和组织内收的发生率更高,证实了早期的观察结果。估计5年和10年的OS率分别为94.7%和81.1%。相应的DFS率分别为92.1%和79.7%,两组间差异无统计学意义。结论:通过长期随访,我们的研究结果强化了多导管间质近距离放射治疗的APBI是一种安全有效的替代WBI的选择,在提供与WBI相当的长期肿瘤控制和生存,同时提供改善的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
240
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Oncology is an international journal devoted to fostering interaction between experimental and clinical oncology. It covers all aspects of research on cancer, from the more basic discoveries dealing with both cell and molecular biology of tumour cells, to the most advanced clinical assays of conventional and new drugs. In addition, the journal has a strong commitment to facilitating the transfer of knowledge from the basic laboratory to the clinical practice, with the publication of educational series devoted to closing the gap between molecular and clinical oncologists. Molecular biology of tumours, identification of new targets for cancer therapy, and new technologies for research and treatment of cancer are the major themes covered by the educational series. Full research articles on a broad spectrum of subjects, including the molecular and cellular bases of disease, aetiology, pathophysiology, pathology, epidemiology, clinical features, and the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer, will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信