Supportive interactional algorithmic monitoring systems matter! Fostering affective commitment among highly flexible but insecure digital platform workforces.
{"title":"Supportive interactional algorithmic monitoring systems matter! Fostering affective commitment among highly flexible but insecure digital platform workforces.","authors":"Changyu Wang, Jianyu Chen","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2025.2566172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Broadly using algorithmic monitoring systems, digital gig platforms offer flexible work arrangements but simultaneously expose workers to various insecurities in non-standard employment, leading to high turnover rates and lower job performance. We address this underexplored question by exploring how and when to cultivate affective commitment among highly flexible but insecure platform workforces. Drawing on fairness heuristic theory and the mutual verification of 269 two-wave time-lagged surveys and 303 cross-sectional surveys from gig workers working on different digital platforms in China, we demonstrate that interactional justice fully mediates the positive effect of platform work flexibility and the negative effect of platform work insecurity on affective commitment to the platform. Interactional algorithmic monitoring mitigates the indirect negative effect of platform work insecurity on affective commitment. We offer key ergonomic implications for designing supportive interactional algorithmic monitoring systems enabling gig workers to improve performance-related outcomes by fostering their affective commitment to the platform.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2566172","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Broadly using algorithmic monitoring systems, digital gig platforms offer flexible work arrangements but simultaneously expose workers to various insecurities in non-standard employment, leading to high turnover rates and lower job performance. We address this underexplored question by exploring how and when to cultivate affective commitment among highly flexible but insecure platform workforces. Drawing on fairness heuristic theory and the mutual verification of 269 two-wave time-lagged surveys and 303 cross-sectional surveys from gig workers working on different digital platforms in China, we demonstrate that interactional justice fully mediates the positive effect of platform work flexibility and the negative effect of platform work insecurity on affective commitment to the platform. Interactional algorithmic monitoring mitigates the indirect negative effect of platform work insecurity on affective commitment. We offer key ergonomic implications for designing supportive interactional algorithmic monitoring systems enabling gig workers to improve performance-related outcomes by fostering their affective commitment to the platform.
期刊介绍:
Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives.
The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people.
All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.