Systematic review of penile glans necrosis.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Hygor Franca Buss, Fabio Thadeu Ferreira, Thiago Guedes Giles, Thiely Guedes Giles
{"title":"Systematic review of penile glans necrosis.","authors":"Hygor Franca Buss, Fabio Thadeu Ferreira, Thiago Guedes Giles, Thiely Guedes Giles","doi":"10.1093/jsxmed/qdaf251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Penile glans necrosis is a rare, debilitating condition with significant cosmetic and functional consequences. Despite its clinical importance, no standardized treatment protocol exists owing to a lack of robust evidence and variability in management practices.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review aims to evaluate therapeutic interventions for penile glans ischemia and necrosis, identify gaps in current knowledge, and propose a framework for future clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement, a systematic search of PubMed was performed from March 2024 to May 2025 using predefined search terms related to penile glans ischemia and necrosis. The inclusion criteria focused on cases of ischemia caused by reduced blood flow, excluding those linked to infections, calciphylaxis, priapism, or immediate surgical interventions. Outcomes were classified by lesion extent and type (grades I-III, A-B), and statistical analyses explored associations between treatment modalities and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed with the JBI and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 48 studies encompassing 79 patients were analyzed. Circumcision (n = 55) and prostatic artery embolization (n = 13) were the most common etiologies. Treatments varied widely, including hyperbaric oxygen therapy (44.94%), antibiotics (43.82%), surgical interventions (43.82%), and pentoxifylline (40.45%). While grade A ischemia was significantly associated with better outcomes (P < .001, odds ratio = 182.77), no single treatment modality demonstrated statistically superior efficacy when compared pairwise. Antibiotic therapy and surgical interventions were associated with worse outcomes, likely reflecting their use in more severe cases. Publication bias and heterogeneity in case descriptions posed challenges to definitive conclusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early recognition of ischemia significantly improves outcomes, highlighting the importance of prompt diagnosis and intervention, and the combination of pentoxifylline, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, anticoagulation, and topical agents may offer synergistic benefits. The findings of this review underscore the critical need for evidence-based protocols, standardized classification systems, consistent therapeutic strategies, and robust clinical trials; future research should focus on prospective studies with standardized methodologies to optimize care and improve functional and aesthetic outcomes for affected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sexual Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sexual Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdaf251","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Penile glans necrosis is a rare, debilitating condition with significant cosmetic and functional consequences. Despite its clinical importance, no standardized treatment protocol exists owing to a lack of robust evidence and variability in management practices.

Objectives: This systematic review aims to evaluate therapeutic interventions for penile glans ischemia and necrosis, identify gaps in current knowledge, and propose a framework for future clinical practice.

Methods: In accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement, a systematic search of PubMed was performed from March 2024 to May 2025 using predefined search terms related to penile glans ischemia and necrosis. The inclusion criteria focused on cases of ischemia caused by reduced blood flow, excluding those linked to infections, calciphylaxis, priapism, or immediate surgical interventions. Outcomes were classified by lesion extent and type (grades I-III, A-B), and statistical analyses explored associations between treatment modalities and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed with the JBI and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions tools.

Results: Data from 48 studies encompassing 79 patients were analyzed. Circumcision (n = 55) and prostatic artery embolization (n = 13) were the most common etiologies. Treatments varied widely, including hyperbaric oxygen therapy (44.94%), antibiotics (43.82%), surgical interventions (43.82%), and pentoxifylline (40.45%). While grade A ischemia was significantly associated with better outcomes (P < .001, odds ratio = 182.77), no single treatment modality demonstrated statistically superior efficacy when compared pairwise. Antibiotic therapy and surgical interventions were associated with worse outcomes, likely reflecting their use in more severe cases. Publication bias and heterogeneity in case descriptions posed challenges to definitive conclusions.

Conclusion: Early recognition of ischemia significantly improves outcomes, highlighting the importance of prompt diagnosis and intervention, and the combination of pentoxifylline, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, anticoagulation, and topical agents may offer synergistic benefits. The findings of this review underscore the critical need for evidence-based protocols, standardized classification systems, consistent therapeutic strategies, and robust clinical trials; future research should focus on prospective studies with standardized methodologies to optimize care and improve functional and aesthetic outcomes for affected patients.

阴茎龟头坏死的系统回顾。
简介:阴茎龟头坏死是一种罕见的,使人衰弱的疾病,具有显著的美容和功能后果。尽管它具有临床重要性,但由于缺乏强有力的证据和管理实践的可变性,没有标准化的治疗方案。目的:本系统综述旨在评估阴茎头缺血和坏死的治疗干预措施,确定当前知识的空白,并为未来的临床实践提出框架。方法:根据PRISMA 2020声明,从2024年3月至2025年5月,使用与阴茎龟头缺血和坏死相关的预定义搜索词对PubMed进行系统检索。纳入标准侧重于由血流量减少引起的缺血病例,排除与感染、钙化反应、阴茎勃起障碍或立即手术干预有关的病例。结果根据病变程度和类型(I-III级,A-B级)进行分类,统计分析探讨治疗方式和结果之间的关系。使用JBI和非随机研究干预工具评估偏倚风险。结果:我们分析了48项研究的数据,包括79名患者。包皮环切术(55例)和前列腺动脉栓塞(13例)是最常见的病因。治疗方法多种多样,包括高压氧治疗(44.94%)、抗生素(43.82%)、手术干预(43.82%)和己酮茶碱(40.45%)。结论:早期发现缺血可显著改善预后,突出了及时诊断和干预的重要性,并且自酮茶碱、高压氧治疗、抗凝和局部药物联合使用可能具有协同效应。本综述的发现强调了对循证方案、标准化分类系统、一致的治疗策略和健全的临床试验的迫切需要;未来的研究应侧重于采用标准化方法的前瞻性研究,以优化护理并改善患者的功能和美学结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sexual Medicine
Journal of Sexual Medicine 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
826
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sexual Medicine publishes multidisciplinary basic science and clinical research to define and understand the scientific basis of male, female, and couples sexual function and dysfunction. As an official journal of the International Society for Sexual Medicine and the International Society for the Study of Women''s Sexual Health, it provides healthcare professionals in sexual medicine with essential educational content and promotes the exchange of scientific information generated from experimental and clinical research. The Journal of Sexual Medicine includes basic science and clinical research studies in the psychologic and biologic aspects of male, female, and couples sexual function and dysfunction, and highlights new observations and research, results with innovative treatments and all other topics relevant to clinical sexual medicine. The objective of The Journal of Sexual Medicine is to serve as an interdisciplinary forum to integrate the exchange among disciplines concerned with the whole field of human sexuality. The journal accomplishes this objective by publishing original articles, as well as other scientific and educational documents that support the mission of the International Society for Sexual Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信