Normal range of femoral version for different measurement methods on CT or MRI-scoping review of normal femoral version.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-21 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1093/jhps/hnaf003
Till D Lerch, Thierry Leimbacher, Malin K Meier, Adam Boschung, Emanuel F Liechti, Moritz Tannast, Simon D Steppacher, Florian Schmaranzer
{"title":"Normal range of femoral version for different measurement methods on CT or MRI-scoping review of normal femoral version.","authors":"Till D Lerch, Thierry Leimbacher, Malin K Meier, Adam Boschung, Emanuel F Liechti, Moritz Tannast, Simon D Steppacher, Florian Schmaranzer","doi":"10.1093/jhps/hnaf003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Correct quantification of femoral version (FV) is crucial for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) patients for diagnosis and for surgical planning. However, different measurement methods for FV and different normal values are confusing. The study aimed to investigate differences in FV measurement methods and to review normal FV. This retrospective comparative study investigated a total of 84 hips for FV measurement: 48 hips (asymptomatic patients) and 36 hips (asymptomatic volunteers) without hip pain. The 48 patients underwent computed tomography (CT) for another reason (mean age 63 ± 11 years) and most (39 hips, 81%) were male patients. The 36 hips reported no hip pain at the time of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (mean age 27 ± 7 years, 20 female patients, 56%). FV was measured on CT or MRI included pelvis and knee) and with the Murphy method. Mean FV for 48 hips was 22° (range 5-34°), and for 36 hips, it was 24° (7-44°). No significant differences were found between the two groups. For 39 male patients with CT scans, the mean FV was 21° (6-34°) and was significantly (<i>P</i> = 0.041) decreased compared to female patients (FV of 26°). For the review, 18 studies were compared that evaluated normal FV (total of 2275 hips) in the literature. Increasing values for normal FV were found for measurement methods with a more distal definition of the femoral neck axis: Normal values were reported for the Lee method (most proximal definition; 8-11°), Reikeras method (9-20°), Oblique/Jarrett method (9-15°), Tomczak method (22-24°), and Murphy method (most distal: 18-23°). Reported normal range of FV differs between measurement methods. This is important for patients with FAI/hip dysplasia undergoing hip preservation surgery (hip arthroscopy/femoral derotation osteotomy).</p>","PeriodicalId":48583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","volume":"12 3","pages":"157-163"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461209/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnaf003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Correct quantification of femoral version (FV) is crucial for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) patients for diagnosis and for surgical planning. However, different measurement methods for FV and different normal values are confusing. The study aimed to investigate differences in FV measurement methods and to review normal FV. This retrospective comparative study investigated a total of 84 hips for FV measurement: 48 hips (asymptomatic patients) and 36 hips (asymptomatic volunteers) without hip pain. The 48 patients underwent computed tomography (CT) for another reason (mean age 63 ± 11 years) and most (39 hips, 81%) were male patients. The 36 hips reported no hip pain at the time of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (mean age 27 ± 7 years, 20 female patients, 56%). FV was measured on CT or MRI included pelvis and knee) and with the Murphy method. Mean FV for 48 hips was 22° (range 5-34°), and for 36 hips, it was 24° (7-44°). No significant differences were found between the two groups. For 39 male patients with CT scans, the mean FV was 21° (6-34°) and was significantly (P = 0.041) decreased compared to female patients (FV of 26°). For the review, 18 studies were compared that evaluated normal FV (total of 2275 hips) in the literature. Increasing values for normal FV were found for measurement methods with a more distal definition of the femoral neck axis: Normal values were reported for the Lee method (most proximal definition; 8-11°), Reikeras method (9-20°), Oblique/Jarrett method (9-15°), Tomczak method (22-24°), and Murphy method (most distal: 18-23°). Reported normal range of FV differs between measurement methods. This is important for patients with FAI/hip dysplasia undergoing hip preservation surgery (hip arthroscopy/femoral derotation osteotomy).

正常范围的股骨版本不同的测量方法在CT或mri范围内审查正常的股骨版本。
股骨内径(FV)的正确量化对于股骨髋臼撞击(FAI)患者的诊断和手术计划至关重要。然而,不同的FV测量方法和不同的正常值令人困惑。本研究旨在探讨FV测量方法的差异,并回顾正常FV。这项回顾性比较研究共调查了84个髋关节进行FV测量:48个髋关节(无症状患者)和36个髋关节(无症状志愿者)没有髋关节疼痛。48例患者因其他原因接受了计算机断层扫描(CT)(平均年龄63±11岁),大多数(39髋,81%)为男性患者。36例髋关节在磁共振成像(MRI)时无髋关节疼痛(平均年龄27±7岁,女性20例,56%)。通过CT或MRI(包括骨盆和膝关节)和Murphy法测量FV。48髋的平均FV为22°(范围5-34°),36髋的平均FV为24°(范围7-44°)。两组间无明显差异。39例男性患者CT扫描平均FV为21°(6-34°),与女性患者(FV为26°)相比显著(P = 0.041)降低。本综述比较了18项评估正常FV的研究(共2275髋)。股骨颈轴远端定义的测量方法的正常FV值增加:Lee法(最近端定义为8-11°)、Reikeras法(9-20°)、斜/贾勒特法(9-15°)、Tomczak法(22-24°)和Murphy法(最远端定义为18-23°)的FV值正常。不同测量方法报告的FV正常范围不同。这对于接受髋关节保留手术(髋关节镜检查/股骨去旋截骨术)的FAI/髋关节发育不良患者很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信